TEXARKANA, Ark. – A woman whose parents and grandparents followed evangelist Tony Alamo testified at his sex-crime trial Wednesday that “Papa Tony” segregated children by gender to prevent “hanky-panky” and controlled everything at his religious compound.
The woman, now 30, said children in the compound were not allowed to attend public schools and instead took classes that Alamo himself approved. She also said the pastor’s consent was needed if a follower wanted to obtain food or clothing, or borrow a car from the motor pool.
“He had control over everything,” the woman said.
Alamo, 74, is accused of taking five girls across state lines for sex between 1994 and 2005. The woman did not testify about any specific allegations before the judge ordered a recess so workers could fix a broken computer monitor at the defense table.
The woman said her first memory of Alamo was from age 3, when his ministry was based along Georgia Ridge in far western Arkansas. Her family moved to New York briefly in 1991 after federal marshals seized the land amid Alamo’s disputes with the IRS and Labor Department.
In the fifth grade, she said, Alamo ordered boys and girls into separate classrooms.
“He said he didn’t want, as he put it, any hanky-panky between boys and girl,” the woman said.
In 1992, the girl was a young teen and had returned to western Arkansas. She and other girls worked as baby-sitters and also had to help in the church office or wrap candy at one of Alamo’s business ventures. Her mother, she said, purchased groceries to feed the flock.
Prosecutors alleged in their opening statement Tuesday that Alamo took a girl as young as age 8 as a bride and repeatedly sexually assaulted her and that at least four other girls were raped or assaulted as well. Defense lawyers say the girls traveled the country for outreach and to support the business interests of a “bona fide religious group.”
Jurors were expected to hear from Alamo’s alleged victims early in the trial. While the woman who testified Wednesday did not discuss specific sex crimes, it is expected that she will. The Associated Press generally does not identify alleged victims of sex crimes.
In questioning Wednesday, a woman in a photograph shown to the witness was identified as “one of Tony Alamo’s wives” – drawing a sharp objection from Alamo’s lawyers. U.S. District Judge Harry F. Barnes has said references to Alamo’s alleged polygamy is off limits.
After a few minutes of discussion at the bench, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyra Jenner referred to women in the photos as “residents” of Tony Alamo’s home.
During the bench conference, Alamo grabbed a book of photos from the defense table and looked at the pictures from a distance of about 2 inches. The woman on the stand smiled occasionally while looking around the courtroom. During a glance at Alamo she wiped away a tear.
Defense lawyers say the government targeted the ministry for prosecution and Alamo says the trial is part of a Vatican-led conspiracy against him.
“This investigation, this prosecution was fueled by prejudice the government and law enforcement have against Tony Alamo’s church because of its practices,” said Don Ervin, who is leading Alamo’s defense team.
Alamo, whose ministry grew into a multimillion industry on the backs of his followers, was convicted of tax evasion charges in 1994. He served four years in prison after the IRS said he owed the government $7.9 million.
In 1991, Alamo was acquitted of threatening a federal judge – a case that fueled an extraordinary increase in security efforts for Alamo’s current trial.
State and federal agents raided Alamo’s compound in far southwestern Arkansas last September. Alamo was later named in a 10-count indictment.
If convicted, Alamo faces 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count. He is being held without bond until the end of his trial.
Associated Press – July 15, 2009
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



posted July 15, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Assuming he is guilty, which sounds quite likely, I hope he spends the rest of his life doing hard time among cons who know what he did to those girls.
Now as to the adults who submitted to that life, they are terminally stupid but that’s allowed. But as to parents who kept their children in that life, they share in Alamo’s guilt and I’d really like to see them pay appropriately. I’m not sure how to do that without making the children wards of the state but I don’t think any of them are fit parents so that may well be the best alternative.
And I think no group should be allowed to live in that much secrecy since it’s become clear significant numbers of people are stupid enough to succumb to things like that; it’s happened over and over. States owe it to their weakest citizens to poke into the dark, stinky parts of their society with some regularity.
posted July 15, 2009 at 7:57 pm
From an AP story on this:
And this from a woman who had left but couldn’t face the outside world and came back:
posted July 15, 2009 at 7:59 pm
“Don’t question what the Lord told me to do.”
and
“If you leave you’ll burn in hell.”
Sound like any churches you know? Any people who sometimes post on here?
posted July 15, 2009 at 9:33 pm
This is the danger of fundamentalist fanaticism. People who are otherwise rational can subject themselves and even their children to any pervert who shouts “Lord! Lord!” Such willful rejection of one’s own rationality represents not only criminal irresponsibility but also, to me, a desecration of their own spiritual dignity and consciousness. This time, it took the form of cult-like devotion to a pervert; in another setting, it could take the form of a suicide bomber… a murderer… all because they were told that their souls depended on rejecting their own rationality and responsibility.
posted July 16, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Or….If you’re following R. Maddows reporting about the Fundamentalist, “The Family”. Book by Jeff Sharlett. These Political men, the two senators that have had girlfriends recently in the news. They and the rest of group think that God has put them in leadership in U.S. and they alone have the right to do pretty much as they please, as they work with each other praying to Jesus for help. This is scary they are in the workings of our government.
posted July 16, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Very scary, Henrietta!