Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

For ‘Values Voters,’ Health Care Reform Holds Little Value

posted by mconsoli | 4:53pm Monday September 21, 2009

WASHINGTON — Health care reform may be Priority No. 1 in Congress and at the White House, but for the 1,825 religious conservatives who gathered here for the annual Values Voter Summit over the weekend, the subject was barely on their radar screen.
“To me, there are so many more important issues than health care right now,” said John Leaman, a retired yacht builder from Lancaster, Pa. Added his wife Linda, a waitress: “I don’t think it’s as urgent as Obama’s making it out to be.” The real problem, she said, is illegal immigrants “cluttering up our emergency rooms.”
Indeed, among the dozen issues that attendees cited in casting their votes in a straw poll for possible 2012 Republican presidential candidates, health care never made the list. The top three issues were abortion, protecting religious liberty and opposing same-sex marriage.
Across dozens of interviews, conservative activists insisted they do care about health care — several people said they’ve helped pay neighbors’ medical bills — but they get red-faced at the idea of any government role in reforming the system.
“It’s up to us to help each other; it’s not the government’s job to take care of us,” said Karen Marsalis, a retired teacher from Deadwood, Texas, whose shirt, like her husband’s, featured stars and stripes and images of the Statue of Liberty.
Just days before the summit got underway, a report by the University of Akron and the liberal-leaning group Public Religion Research found that conservative and progressive activists don’t just disagree on hot-button issues on the public agenda, they can’t agree on the agenda itself.
Conservative activists — typified by the “values voters” who rallied in Washington — picked abortion (83 percent) and same-sex marriage (65 percent) as their top two issues; just 6 percent cited health care. Progressives, meanwhile, cited poverty (74 percent) and health care (67 percent).
The only organized attention that health care received at the two-day summit was a panel discussion on “ObamaCare: Rationing Your Life Away.” Judging from the voices of the “values voters,” the two sides also can’t seem to agree on basic facts, much less solutions.
Take, for example, the number of insured Americans. President Obama, and most surveys, put the number of Americans without health insurance at between 30 and 45 million. That’s nonsense, said Dr. Rick Elimon, a general-practice surgeon from North Little Rock, Ark.
“It’s totally blown out of proportion,” he said. If you subtract illegal immigrants and those who intentionally choose not to buy health insurance, the number is closer to 10 million. “You’re always going to have people who are not going to have insurance because they don’t want it,” he said.
They’re people like Elimon’s healthy (and employed) 28-year-old son, who his father said wants to spend money on other things, and Jan DeLand of Anchorage, Alaska, who said she gets along fine without insurance, and chafes at a government-imposed mandate to purchase insurance.
“That’s not been my priority,” she said. “I don’t want to be forced into a system that I didn’t choose.”
Underlying the resistance to health care reform is a deep and abiding distrust of government. Delegates booed at any mention of “Obamacare,” and cheered Texas Gov. Rick Perry when he decried a government that “has its hands too far in our pockets and its nose too deep in our business.”
“We just need to go back to what Mr. Reagan said,” said Marsalis’ husband, William, a retired government engineer. “Government is the problem, not the solution.”
Many attendees drew a distinction between access to health care and health care reform. Anyone who needs treatment, they said, can get the care they need. How they pay for it is their problem, no one else’s.
“Personal responsibility is not something people want to do anymore,” said Debbie Michael of Mount Airy, Md. “We expect the government to do it all.”
Mandi Campbell, a 24-year-old graduate of Liberty University Law School who now works with the conservative legal firm Liberty Counsel, cited an uninsured friend who was injured in a skiing accident. The $10,000 MRI was eventually written off by the hospital, she said, when her friend couldn’t afford to pay.
“So if someone truly needs care and emergency attention,” she said, “there are options.”
Still, some attendees said there is room for improvement. Lorie Watson, a nurse from Simpsonville, S.C., works for an insurance company administrating third-party claims and worries about the high costs of drugs and tests. She said Washington could have “a limited role in reform, but not in providing health care.”
Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council and FRC Action, which hosted the summit, said if you take a “government take-over” of health care and federal funding for abortion off the table, there is room to discuss making insurance more “accessible and affordable,” starting with protecting doctors from malpractice suits and making insurance “portable” across state lines and jobs.
“That’s a conversation we need to have,” he said.
But for many conservatives, it’s not a conversation that should involve any government agency.
“I don’t want the same people who are running the DMV,” said Howard University law student Mike Blackmon, “to be running my health care.”
By KEVIN ECKSTROM
c. 2009 Religion News Service
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Previous Posts

Did Obama mean to pick a fight with America’s two largest denominations?
In an election year of all times, why would President Barack Obama choose to infuriate both America’s Catholics and Southern Baptists? “It seems that Obama, in a classic act of hubris, has created the means of his own destruction,” writes conservative commentator J.R. Dunn in the American T

posted 4:42:46pm Feb. 13, 2012 | read full post »

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(31)
post a comment
Your Name

posted September 21, 2009 at 8:52 pm


Were there any real “facts” in this “news” article? Where’s the journalistic rigor? If the number of uninsured Americans is called into question, why is it not the journalist’s job to do the research and give a real number?
What exactly did this “news” article illuminate? That lots of people don’t research the issues they care about?
Jesus, what a waste of good code.



report abuse
 

My Name

posted September 21, 2009 at 9:16 pm


So basically what does a value constitute for the ‘Value Voters’? So some retired guy who made toys for the rich (yachts) does not think fixing the world’s most expensive yet least effective health care system of any industrialized nation is a priority BUT dealing with those darn Mexicans and making sure we don’t let homosexuals have secular rights and equal access to benefits are?? Wow, I’m ashamed to be a registered Republican. What happened to the true conservative notions of small government and even smaller government interference in our lives and commerce?? Keep your nose out of my life and hands off my wallet. Libertarian party here I come!!! (Because democrats suck too.)



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 21, 2009 at 10:11 pm


I, too was a registered Republican but back in the day it was more defensible. It’s a very different, rotted party now. Get out. These people are living in a fantasy world.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted September 21, 2009 at 10:13 pm


I’m a registered Independent…I refuse to belong to any political party.



report abuse
 

Kauko

posted September 21, 2009 at 11:08 pm


My voter resistration card just says unafiliated :)



report abuse
 

Heretic_for_Christ

posted September 22, 2009 at 9:09 am


All the political labels are meaningless. No one is a conservative in the sense of wanting to conserve (that is, maintain) the status quo. The only meaningful labels would be “progressive” (a desire to move forward and try something new and different and hopefully better) and “reactionary” (a desire to return to a supposedly better past era).



report abuse
 

methodistsearching

posted September 22, 2009 at 12:27 pm


So exactly what kind of values are expressed by a woman who refers to sick human beings as “cluttering up our emergency rooms”?



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 22, 2009 at 12:56 pm


I suspect most people pick parties because of certain people that have represented the party and most people have no idea of how the politicians of all parties consider them as things they can and must manipulate.
I suspect that Obama is trying to rush this legislation through knowing it is flawed with the idea that once he has forced the change through his people can work out the bugs. there are huge concerns with this type of tactic in that the clean up and fallout may outweigh the good in the project long after Obama is gone.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted September 22, 2009 at 1:13 pm


Sort of like Bush did?



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 22, 2009 at 2:20 pm


yes H22 exactly



report abuse
 

No More

posted September 22, 2009 at 2:33 pm


I don’t know why these folks won’t acknowledge that the health insurance companies are way out of control and need to be brought under control; the only way this will happen is if the government does get involved.
10 years ago, I had “good” health coverage (Kaiser Permanente), and their death panel almost killed me. One night, in so much abdominal pain that I was literally writhing (I could not stop moving or the pain completely overwhelmed me), I was taken into their emergency clinic. They gave me a “gastric cocktail” which contained lidocaine; they said if it was anything to do with my stomach, that would stop the pain right away. It didn’t. The doctor told me I would have to return in the morning for an ultrasound, gave me an injection of Demerol and Phenargan, and sent me home. The next morning I had the ultrasound done; the doctor looked at it, told me it was acid reflux, and gave me more Demerol. We returned 3 more times with the same result before, on the third day, I saw a nurse practitioner. She took one look at my ultrasound and sent me to a surgeon; she said my gallbladder was very inflamed, and I would need to have it removed. I saw the surgeon right away, and he looked at the ultrasound and told me that he needed me on the table “yesterday.” He sent me over to the hospital and operated that afternoon. Apparently my gallbladder was packed with stones, badly inflamed, and in danger of rupturing. So…why didn’t the doctor send me over to the surgeon in the first place? I later learned that Kaiser paid their doctors incentives to NOT send patients to specialists.
Now I have BC/BS Anthem, and am floored by the things that they deny payment for. According to them, any kind of cold therapy following major joint surgery is “not medically necessary.” They will pay any amount of money for pain medication, though.
I could go on all day. So what I want to know is do these people have health coverage? And if so, do they like it? I have nothing good to say about any provider that I have had over the last 20 years.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 22, 2009 at 3:57 pm


Thank you NM for some truth about “death panels”.
There seems to be a concerted effort to not seriously consider the best solution, which is to extend Medicare to everyone thereby putting us all into an effecient system and also getting rid of the majority of overpaid executives in the insurance industry. If someone wanted additional coverage they should be able to buy it for themselves.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 22, 2009 at 5:29 pm


NM it matters little what coverage you have doctors still will make mistakes and having the government take over will do little to improve that. As a matter of fact taking a look at our government I can’t see it doing any better but maybe worst.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 22, 2009 at 8:55 pm


Well as it is thousands of people don’t have insurance and because of that many get poor health care and many die unnecessarily. And insurance executives get paid ridiculous salaries and our insurance payments fund the people whose job it is to deny our claims. And as you can see private insurance does have what amounts to “death panels”.
I feel confident the government can’t do worse and is almost certain to do better. Remember, the government is answerable to us if we get really upset.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 22, 2009 at 11:20 pm


nnmns quote, “the government is answerable to us if we get really upset.”
HA, oh great and mighty nnmns take the govnment to task your kung fu is great.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm


I didn’t say “me”, I said “us”. I think where our medical care was at stake we’d do a good job of keeping them on their toes.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted September 23, 2009 at 1:12 pm


The government wouldn’t be taking over at all, they will be straightening out what has been broken for the people who want a Health Insurance they can afford, for some the first time in their lives. The naysayers and Obama attackers would rather cut off the ends of their noses than to admit Obama is right. For the people who are satisfied with what they have it will keep the Insurance Companies from raising their premiums higher, and giving them less coverage all the time. What I find amazing is the people in this article who think that they don’t need Insurance and Health Care changed think nothing of giving huge amounts of money to organizations to feed the poor, and people who are having a down period in their economic lives. Then say that it isn’t important for these same people to be able to be covered by health insurance in some way that only the magnitude of our Government of the U.S. could give them. They truly lack common sense and charity.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 23, 2009 at 8:01 pm


Get some facts H22 I have never seen anyone denied medical needs if they take the right approach and as for the government fixing anything that is a laugh some of the worst hospitals are government run like V.A. hospitals where patients are neglected and over medicated. Government take taxes they don’t fix and they get the coverage that is breaking our tax paying backs.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 23, 2009 at 8:04 pm


Our government is borrowing money from China for failed management.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 23, 2009 at 10:57 pm


Actually cknuck a lot of people are denied treatment and a lot never get treatment. You are way, way out of that loop.
Our government has been borrowing money from China for a long time. That comes from, just for instance, invading Iraq without raising taxes to pay for it.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted September 23, 2009 at 11:11 pm


More dark gloom, and old tales of woe, Cknuck?
I don’t think people should have to have a dire emergency and have to go to ER for health problems. They should have doctors they know, and offices to go to before they have a death dealing problem. You simplify to win your own argument. Prevention is the future of medicine all over the world ck. Our government is not a laugh, never was and never will be. If you don’t like your country why don’t you move to another one? Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is run by the govenment, and helped all of us for many years. We have friends who are retired Military and they have never had problems with the VA Hospitals. You shouldn’t jump on an occasional bad experience and paint everything bad because of them. The old cry of taxes is just that, the same old cry everytime something needs to be changed.



report abuse
 

Confessoressa

posted September 24, 2009 at 8:39 am


Cknuck,
If you have never seen any one denied medical needs then you live in a very small world indeed. Your “right approach” just doesn’t cover everyone I think. I know your “Jesus complex” makes you think you’re the be-all end-all to anyone in need but step out of that delusion for a moment and realize that people are actually suffering every day because there is NO WAY for them to get the medical care they need.



report abuse
 

Heretic_for_Christ

posted September 24, 2009 at 9:24 am


Fact: No one is suggesting that the government run medical care (as in, decide how doctors should practice medicine); a completely government-run reimbursement system would be socialized insurance, not socialized medicine.
Fact: We spend an inconceivable amount of money on paperwork for countless insurance providers; individual medical practices and hospitals have to employ people full-time to do nothing but handle insurance paperwork.
Fact: Relying on the emergency room is the most expensive and least efficient way to provide medical care for uninsured people; ER services are extraordinarily expensive, because they are set up to handle true life-threatening emergencies, not routine medical care.
Fact: The VA hospital system usually works pretty well. Certainly, there are exceptional cases of neglect, waste, incompetence–just as occurs in private hospitals.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 24, 2009 at 12:54 pm


Yesterday I heard a discussion of the VA as it relates to the health care debate. It was pointed out the VA had been a real mess but it was cleaned up, largely during the Clinton administration. Now it’s apparently considered the best medical system in the country by several measures. And it is socialized medicine.
cknuck I understand you were in the military. Do you go to VA for anything? If so, how do you justify taking socialized medicine but wanting to deny efficient, available medical care to large numbers of people? On the other hand, as a professed Christian how do you justify taking socialized medicine but wanting to deny efficient, available medical care to large numbers of people?



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 24, 2009 at 11:04 pm


no nnmns I do not use VA hospital services how do you justify making assumptions concerning my life although it is kind of flattering that you think of me so much.
H4C do you really think a government take over will eliminate paper work?



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 25, 2009 at 12:11 am


cknuck what part of “if” don’t you understand?



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 25, 2009 at 1:10 am


nnmns the part of “if” I don’t understand is why, why “if” when “if” is illogical and the only reason for “if” would be incitement.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted September 25, 2009 at 3:42 pm


One reason it would eliminate paperwork is that it would be put into a computer for each patient with all their tests and be available to whatever medical office that needs them, stat. This will enable the patient to have treatment started right away and will have a chance to have a good conclusion for their problem.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted September 25, 2009 at 5:40 pm


H22 you are optimistic, I have no recall of any bureaucratic dealing that run so smooth especially with the government. Never the less I do believe the system can be improved and our government should as it already does have sanctioning but I also believe that Obama’s way is not thoroughly thought out and the glitches will hurt more than they will improve. All of the loopholes are just to hard to cover and will be expensive. Not to mention the fact I believe he lies about the abortion.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted September 26, 2009 at 12:11 am


I think it’s a bad idea to require a lot of people to buy insurance who don’t think they need it. It’s a far better idea to just provide that insurance for everyone (or everyone who’s here legally or under, say, 18.



report abuse
 

GodsCountry

posted October 9, 2009 at 12:06 am


When you think about it, cars are nearly as essential to a healthy life because the vast majority of American workers would not be able to get to their workplaces without a car.
No job is bad for anyone’s health.
How ’bout a nice, reliable car, my big-government friend?
The audacity of redistribution.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.