NEWTON, Mass. (RNS) When Newton, Mass. artist Paula Rendino needed fresh inspiration last year (2008), she sought her muse in an unlikely place: seminary.
Art school would have been “too boring,” Rendino explained. She yearned to bring fresh depth to her work by pondering spiritual themes.
Now she does exactly that alongside dozens of ministers-in-training at Andover Newton Theological School.
“In seminary, you’re looking at philosophy, ethics or poetry and taking the time to really think about something,” Rendino said. “That’s so important because we live in a time where everything is fast, people write in short sentences. (They) don’t take the time to think about things.”
As theological schools cope with intense financial stress, they’re getting a much-needed boost from unconventional students such as Rendino. Enrollments are rising in several corners of theological education as people with no interest in pulpit ministry come to regard the training as a powerful career enhancer.
Schools of varied stripes are noting increases:
– After 20 years without a net increase, enrollment at 118 Bible colleges climbed 1 percent in 2008 and 3 percent in 2009, according to Ralph Enlow, president of the Association for Biblical Higher Education.
– Iliff School of Theology, a United Methodist school in Denver, enrolled 102 new students this year. That’s up from 77 last year and almost twice as many as in an average year (53).
– The Episcopal Seminary of the Southwest in Austin, Texas enrolled 60 new students in 2009. That’s up more than 100 percent from 27 in 2008.
– At the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry, new student enrollment is up 23 percent — from 125 in 2008 to 154 in 2009 — as classes add more Catholic laywomen and laymen with no plans for ordination.
Several factors help account for enrollment increases. The tough job market, admissions officers say, has inspired some to pursue their long-held interests in theology and related subjects. Programs such as the Fund for Theological Education’s Undergraduate Fellowship is encouraging more undergraduates to pursue advanced theological training.
And seminaries have ramped up their recruitment efforts to draw from a non-traditional base of potential applicants.
“Our big push is recruiting folks who want to be social entrepreneurs and advocate for social change,” said Iliff Director of Admissions David Worley in an e-mail.
Perhaps most significant has been a growing interest in what theological education has to offer. In the San Francisco Bay Area, for example, declining interest in the traditional Master of Divinity degree has been offset by a 20 percent increase over the past year in students pursuing other degrees at the Graduate Theological Union’s nine schools.
“More people see this as an entrepreneurial venture,” said GTU Dean Arthur Holder. “They’re saying, `I want to start something. I want to start a new kind of church, a virtual religious community that meets online, or an urban retreat center…’ They’re not expecting the denomination or church organization to do this for them. They want to get the training, the skills and the knowledge (so that) they can create it as they go along.”
Tammie Denyse of Sacramento, Calif., ranks among those giving theological schools hope for the future. She’s founding director of Carrie’s Touch, an advocacy and support organization for women affected by breast cancer. Because cancer-related conversations often turn spiritual, she feels a need to deepen her theological understanding in order to be as effective as possible.
“Now that I know more, I’m able to reach people who say they haven’t talked to God in 20 years,” Denyse said. “They’ve been diagnosed with this cancer, and they need something more than momma’s love to get them through this difficult time.”
National enrollment data aren’t yet available from the Association of Theological Schools, but officials are hopeful that a new trend has begun. Total enrollments at ATS schools dropped 4 percent between 2006 and 2008, marking the first consecutive-year decline in more than 20 years.
If enrollments turn out to be climbing nationwide, such a development would represent good news on what has been a bleak landscape. A fall 2008 ATS report found “financial stress” at 39 percent of its 175 schools that have no university affiliation. Among contributing factors were shrinking endowments and declining enrollments prior to 2009.
For schools that rely on tuition as their primary source of revenue, rising enrollments provide important tool for covering costs. But hard-hit schools will need more than enrollment increases in order to overcome their financial challenges, according to Anthony Ruger, senior research fellow at the Center for the Study of Theological Education at Auburn Theological Seminary.
“Usually when a school is struggling financially, enrollment is only part of the answer,” Ruger said. “They need gifts and careful management of their endowments, as well as expenditure reductions.”
By G. Jeffrey MacDonald
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted December 24, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Silent Night – Holy Night
We celebrate the coming of Christ’s pure light
Set aside your differences and open up your heart
No matter your persuasion it’s time for a new start.
Merry Christmas Everyone
Peace and Goodwill
jestrfyl
posted December 24, 2009 at 11:08 pm
“More people see this as an entrepreneurial venture,”
yeah that’s what Jesus was shooting for, yuck.
Many professional churchmen with fancy degrees are so far away from Jesus stood for these days.
posted December 25, 2009 at 12:56 pm
52ws6u
posted December 25, 2009 at 12:57 pm
What I meant to say was:
I guess you mean like harassing the homosexuals and denying women and families the abortions they need. Funny he’s not recorded as having used either the word “abortion” or the word “homosexual”.
But then those professional churchmen can’t get inside your head, where they’d have to go to see what your Jesus stood for.
I feel really strange defending “professional churchmen”.
posted December 26, 2009 at 2:54 am
Too much nog nnmns? Yeah Jesus was all for abortion. Are you sick or what? Jesus may have never mentioned homosexuality or abortion but only an atheist or a fool would think that He was for either, neither glorifies God the creator because neither creates, neither is productive just waste of time.
posted December 26, 2009 at 4:22 pm
I’d say Jesus surely didn’t care about abortion or homosexuality or he’d have put something about them in the record.
Some of you have this thing about “glorifying God” which seems really strange since a being as powerful as your god could take care of that all by itself. I’d have to call it sucking up instead.
posted December 26, 2009 at 6:06 pm
nnmns some times I wonder what do you want from God. First as you may or may not know there were no practicing abortionist other than what some called the abortion god Molech which the bible strongly speaks against. As for homosexuality, you like wikipedia read it, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_topics_and_Judaism
I won’t even comment on your “sucking up” statement and the bitterness that projects.
posted December 26, 2009 at 6:46 pm
ck, I’m not sure what you’re trying to accomplish by providing evidence that Judaism, though significantly older than Christianity, is far more open-minded about certain issues. Not even the most Orthodox of Jews want to kill us anymore, which is more than can be said for certain groups of Christians (and Muslims, so you can’t accuse me of singling you guys out).
posted December 26, 2009 at 11:19 pm
You just don’t get it do you cknuck! There is no god so why would I want anything from him, her, it or them?
Oh, and the Bible speaks strongly against all competing gods. It is, after all, a recruitment and retention publication for Judaism (the OT; the NT is of course doing the same for Christianity).
Now let’s examine an earlier post of yours:
“Jesus may have never mentioned homosexuality or abortion but only an atheist or a fool would think that He was for either, neither glorifies God the creator because neither creates, neither is productive just waste of time.”
In other words Jesus never mentioned abortion or homosexuality but no Jesus I’d approve of would be for abortion or homosexuality so he was against them
You’ve created your Jesus in your image just as you’ve created your god in your image. They exist in your head and nowhere else. I know you can’t see it but some others can.
posted December 28, 2009 at 12:01 am
nnmns you continue to prove my quote yo used as you try to have it both ways, it is important to you to try to prove Jesus would have approved of your murderous position on abortion while hedging you bet with the whole there is no God backup. I am content with where you are at but even more content with where I am.
posted December 28, 2009 at 2:00 am
Talking to you is like talking to a rock. It’s not the least important to me what Jesus might have thought; he may never have existed and if he did, he’s dead. And I’m not interested in him except as his fables affect other people, who make him into what they want him to have been. Like you, like many others here.
But I have to point out, again, that your Jesus is inferior to a lot of the Jesuses of other folks here. Like your god.
posted December 28, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Nnmns: “Jesuses” should read “Jezi”
PS You two deserve each other!
posted December 28, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Thanks, Tom I wondered about that plural. I presume that’s the official RCC plural of “Jesus”, right?
posted December 28, 2009 at 5:39 pm
nnmns Jesus seems to hold your interest and continues to be a major part of your conversations, so your claims are not supported by your passion.
posted December 28, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Nothing official as of yet, but I’ll keep my ear to the ground. It’s kind of a spin-off on Magi, and I’m still waiting on the imprimatur ;)
posted December 29, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Good luck on the imprimatur thing.