2010 Religion News Service (RNS) “Talk with as many people as you can.
Talk vertically, talk laterally.” That’s the advice of the Rev. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, for attendees of the US-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar.
Gaddy went to last year’s forum, which drew big names like former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus, and dozens of religious leaders, military officers, politicians, journalists, technology experts.
“It helped put a face and identity and personality on a people that we only see in media portrayals,” Gaddy said.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is among those expected to attend this year’s forum — the seventh annual — which is scheduled for Feb. 13-15 and sponsored by the Brookings Institution.
The summit comes at a sensitive time in U.S.-Muslim relations. Following the attempted Christmas Day airliner bombing and other recent terror-related arrests, many Americans are increasingly worried about terrorism, and critics are accusing President Obama of being soft on Muslim extremists.
In the Muslim world, many people are angry about the war in Afghanistan, U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, their own economic problems, and expect Obama to deliver remedies faster than his administration may be able to.
“All of us know that the standing that the United States has with young people in the Muslim world is quite negative,” said Episcopal Bishop John Chane of Washington D.C., who has attended two previous forums.
“The U.S. has such a checkered past in international relations.” The sensitive state of U.S.-Islamic relations requires increased religious involvement in American diplomacy, argued Chane and other U.S. religious figures going to this year’s conference.
“When you have 1.5 billion Muslims, 2 billion Christians, and 13 million Jews, from an Abrahamic perspective, you have a lot of influence,” said Chane.
“Twentieth-century diplomacy has failed so far, and we have to recognize that you need religion in the mix.” Pastor Joel Hunter of Northland Church in Florida, who is going to his third forum this year, agreed.
“In the Muslim world, that’s not the way they do things. Their faith is a very integral part of their foreign policy. They want to hear secular and religious ideas,” he said.
Despite current tensions, observers say U.S.-Islamic relations under Obama are much improved from the Bush administration.
“A lot of the Islamic world is more anxious to engage because we have a president who wants to restart relations with Muslims,” said Hunter.
“We’ve gone from a defensive mode to a development and diplomatic mode.” Al-Husein Madhany, a Muslim-American scholar and technology activist who will be convening a conference workshop on how to use new media to build grassroots organizations and civic institutions, agreed.
“We have a moment in history where there’s been a promise made by the leader of the free world for a new beginning,” he said.
“There’s an excitement in people’s voices about America that I didn’t hear during the previous administration.” But after six forums, there are some skeptics who wonder whether such conferences can achieve anything substantive.
“During the Bush administration, they were eye-openers because the Bush administration had a narrow view of the Muslim world.
But the new administration is open to a more complex view of the Muslim world.
I don’t know what these people can do at this point,” said Muqtedar Khan, director of the Islamic studies program at the University of Delaware.
“There have been many conferences, but nothing came out in terms of security,” added Khan, who has attended earlier Doha forums, but is not going this year.
Copyright 2010 Religion News Service.
All rights reserved.
No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted February 11, 2010 at 1:35 am
At least we do have a President who has a clue, for a change.
And those “critics [who] are accusing President Obama of being soft on Muslim extremists” are the typical Republican accusers who won’t say anything good about President Obama no matter what he does. They just want him, and America, to fail. They said so at the start of his term and they’ve done everything they can to make it happen.
In the past there has often been a loyal opposition but rarely if ever has there been such a disloyal (as in traitorous) opposition as the modern Republican party.
This sounds like an interesting event; I wasn’t aware of the earlier ones. But the people who say we need more religion in our foreign policy, I hope, mean we need more understanding of peoples’ religions and their impact on their actions. Religion itself is explosive enough without being part of our foreign policy.
posted February 14, 2010 at 1:55 am
nnmns quote, “Religion itself is explosive enough without being part of our foreign policy”
What do you think a US Islam Summit is?
posted February 14, 2010 at 3:57 pm
What do you think a US Islam Summit is Ck? The Islam countries are run on their religion and government in their country is run on their religion. Our U.S.A. is not and never will be, no matter how hard the Christian fundamentalists will try to make it a theocracy. This is what PS is trying to explain to you. The pastor from FL said we need to talk religion and secularism with the Islamic leaders for more understanding of what all of us is about. They need a crash course in secularism, in my opinion, because that is completely foreign to them.
posted February 14, 2010 at 6:44 pm
H22, thanks for the crash course gibberish, by the way your opinion really matters the Islamic nations I’m sure.
posted February 18, 2010 at 11:03 am
As Muslims are permitted to move to the West bringing Islam and Sharia with them, to remain an Islam history ignoramus is unwise. Go to school online free with the Historyscoper and master all the key facts of Islam and its 1400-year history and learn how to use the Internet to learn as much more as you want. To get started, click http://go.to/islamhistory