CLEVELAND (RNS) A Catholic bishop, acting on what he believes to be good for his entire diocese, can close any parish, even if the parish is financially stable and has vibrant membership, the Vatican’s highest court has ruled.
The decision does not bode well for a string of Cleveland churches that have already been closed by Bishop Richard Lennon, but have appeals pending in a Vatican court.
“This is very significant,” said Peter Borre, a Catholic activist in Boston who represents 10 churches in that city in their appeals to Rome.
“The message is: `No parish is safe.”‘
Robert Tayek, a spokesman for the Cleveland Diocese, declined to comment, saying church officials had not seen the Vatican ruling.
The ruling, made public late last week when it was translated from the original Latin, came on the heels of the Vatican denying the appeals of all 10 Boston churches, which began that process six years ago.
Meanwhile, at least five Cleveland area parishes that closed this year received letters from a Vatican judicial panel saying it needed more time to consider their appeals and extended the hearing deadlines to Nov. 30.
Even with the denial of the appeals in Boston, some here are keeping their fingers crossed.
“I hope the Vatican seriously starts to question what these bishops are doing,” said Patricia Schulte-Singleton, head of a group called Endangered Catholics, which has been battling the local closings.
“Otherwise, it’s going to get out of control and people will start walking away from the Catholic Church.”
Lennon, who closed churches in Boston as an auxiliary bishop before coming to Cleveland four years ago, recently completed a downsizing of the eight-county diocese by closing 50 churches, mostly in inner-city neighborhoods.
He has said the closings were necessary because of shrinking congregations, decreases in collection basket cash and a shortage of priests.
Borre, an expert on church law and an adviser to some Cleveland churches fighting the closings, said the diocese cannot sell the church properties and distribute their assets while they are under appeal.
Borre, who had already battled Lennon in Boston, acknowledged that the Vatican’s ruling dealt a major blow to his effort to keep churches open, but he vowed to keep fighting.
“We’ll challenge Lennon every step of the way,” he said. “If you want to call it economic warfare, you’re close.”
– Michael O’Malley / The Plain Dealer
Copyright 2010 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted July 20, 2010 at 7:29 pm
Why belong to a Parish if it can be closed with no questions asked? Would the congregants allow the church’s Bishop to do as he pleases in order to please him for fear their church could be closed if he isn’t happy? How does this have anything to do with God?
posted July 20, 2010 at 8:48 pm
It’s the Vatican and the RC hierarchy, Henrietta22. Why would you assume it has anything to do with God? Now if we are talking money, power, and an inordinate love of operatic pomp and splendour, that they know about. Haven’t you figured out that they only care about the money North America brings in to the Vatican?
As long as there are sufficient “John and Mary” Catholics blindly putting money in the plate or signing pledges, coupled with big money conservative donors writing checks, nothing will change. Besides Ratzinger and the curial boys have basically written off college educated westerners (though their money is still welcomed!). The future is seen as the global south where there are strongly patriarchal social systems. There you don’t argue with the tribal or village elder or chief. Those folks are socially acclimated to pray, pay and obey.
posted July 20, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Roma locuta est, causa finata est!
posted July 20, 2010 at 10:17 pm
Let me see if I got this straight. Catholic Bishops told US Courts that even though the archdiocese is a Corporation Sole (ie the Bishop is the head of a local parish subcorporation) the individual parish assets cannot be sold to pay the Bishops legal bills because the parishes are owned by the parishioners. Now the Bishops tell the Vatican they can close parishes they don’t like because the Bishop owns the real estate and assets as his personal property…and the parishioners have no say.
Sunthin’ ain’t right! The Bishops seem to want to bend law whenever it serves their interests. Orwellian Doublespeak!
posted July 21, 2010 at 5:29 pm
MNS – it’s called a “locutio contra mentem cum intentionem fallendi” otherwise know as . . . surprise! . . . a lie! Get it?