Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Religious Groups Fight for Tax Deductions

posted by editor

By RICHARD YEAKLEY
c. 2011 Religion News Service
(RNS) For the third time in three years President Obama’s proposed budget will attempt to reduce tax deductions for high-end charitable donors, and for the third time nonprofits and religious organizations are pushing back.
Many religious nonprofits, which supplement their budgets heavily with donations from wealthy donors, are concerned that reducing the tax write-offs for charitable donations will cause a decrease in giving, said Diana Aviv, the president and CEO of Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofit organizations.
“The question is, ‘Do tax incentives work, do they stimulate more money than they cost?”‘ Aviv said, “Experts estimate that this proposal could reduce charitable giving by $7 billion dollars.”
Obama’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2012 includes a 30 percent reduction in itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers. Individual donors making more than $200,000 or families earning more than $250,000 would be able to claim 28 percent of any donation as a tax deduction rather than the current 35 percent.
That would mean that a wealthy taxpayer who donates $10,000 to a charity would be able to only claim a $2,800 deduction on his taxes, rather than $3,500.
Obama has defended this reduction several times, most recently at a White House press conference on Feb. 15.
“When it comes to over the long term, maintaining tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, when that will mean additional deficits of a trillion dollars, if you’re serious about deficit reduction, you don’t do that,” Obama said.
As in years past, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America is again a vocal opponent of Obama’s plan.
“The proposal to reduce the rate of tax deductibility for contributions is a recipe for disastrous displacements and cuts in much-needed nonprofit sector institutions and services,” Nathan Diament, the union’s director of public policy, said in a statement.
Several studies have researched the potential outcome of similar proposals and all concluded there would be a decline in donations, although the significance of the decline varied.
A similar reduction to the one proposed occurred between 2002 and 2003, when the top income tax deduction giving was lowered from 38.6 percent to its current 35 percent. After that reduction, individual charitable contributions actually increased, according the Obama administration.



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

Confessions of a Preacher’s Daughter
She’s the star of “This Is Our Time.” She played Kirk Cameron’s wife in the surprise blockbuster “Fireproof.” But she grew up as the pastor’s kid at a megachurch. Was Erin Bethea the stereotypical fast-driving, hard-drinking, boy-teasing, cigar-smoking preacher’s daughter? After all,

posted 12:04:02pm Apr. 23, 2013 | read full post »

Focus on the Family’s President Says It’s Time to “Refocus”
 It’s tough out there in the culture wars and Jim Daly has the battle scars to prove it. But does the top executive of Focus on the Family believe he can ever successfully declare

posted 10:24:18am Mar. 14, 2013 | read full post »

5-week Bible special a labor of love for famous TV producer and 'Touched by an Angel' wife
It’s a passion project. The new 10-hour mini-series The Bible is “a story of enduring love,” says Mark Burnett, producer of TV mega-hits Survivor (CBS), The Voice (NBC), The Celebrity Apprentice (NBC), and Shark Tank (ABC). “It’s many, many stories that have endured over thousands of ye

posted 4:47:19am Feb. 21, 2013 | read full post »

Who should be allowed to pray for Obama?
It seems preposterous, but there’s a major debate over who is worthy to invoke the presence and blessing of the Almighty on the leaders of this land we love! So, who is qu

posted 1:59:32pm Jan. 15, 2013 | read full post »

Do parents have a say in what schools teach?
Should a Hindu foundation be allowed to finance yoga instruction in California grade schools – despite vehement parental objections? Should a student production featuring cross-dressing and gender confusion go ahead in Utah despite protests from furious parents? [caption id="attachment_12003" a

posted 4:11:31pm Jan. 07, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Henrietta22

posted February 22, 2011 at 7:31 pm


If you’re a wealthy person why would this stop you from doing good? You’ll be twice-good, helping your charities and helping your country’s people. Sounds like a winning blessing to me. And since you happen to live in this country, at least part of the time, you’re helping yourselves, too.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted February 23, 2011 at 7:26 am


You mean those wealthy people who donate and get acclaim for their giving are doing that on our backs too!
If you’ve got all that money and think a thing needs to be done why indeed wouldn’t you just do it? What we are hearing is well-to-do administrators of those charities squealing because they’re afraid their cushy jobs won’t be so cushy.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted February 23, 2011 at 10:40 am


I am surely in the minority on this, certainly with my colleagues, but — tax deductions for religous groups make me itch. I am a firm believer in the separation of Church and State. Getting a tax break on property used for services of worship and other specifically religious activities slips past that divide. If I don;t think the line should be voided in one direction, then it ought not be voided in another. Facilities for religious gatherings require a fai amount of infrastructure and it seems only right that the groups getting the advantage pay for its cost. I understand there is a benefit from having organization like churches, synagogues, and mosques in a community. But that benefit should not break the community tax base. There ought to be a better way to manage all of this without violating one of the tenets of our national identity. I know my Board of Finance would not appreciate this philosophy, and we certainly take advantage of whatever tax breaks we can get, but I have this rash of hypocracy that will not go away.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted February 23, 2011 at 12:25 pm


I like your comment on this Jestrfyl. It’s not only the Churches that slip by without some sort of tax it’s also all the property, and investments that they own as well. They should look on this as paying their fair share and helping the country’s economy and the people who are their members as well as others that they don’t know. Everyone else is being told by someone in politics right now, “We all have to do differently”. How about the Churches?



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted February 24, 2011 at 1:25 am


I’m hoping this one come back to bite Obama in the butt and I see the last of him.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.