Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Court Rejects Challenge to ‘In God We Trust’

posted by Jennifer E. Jones

WASHINGTON (RNS) Atheist Michael Newdow plans to continue his fight to get “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency after the Supreme Court denied a hearing in his case on Monday (March 7).
“I plan on bringing the lawsuit again on behalf of other Americans who believe they are injured when the government lends its power to one side of the controversy over whether or not God exists,” he said Tuesday.
Newdow, a doctor in Sacramento, Calif., has filed numerous First Amendment suits concerning government endorsement of religion. He filed the challenge to the national motto in 2005.
A year ago, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him, citing a 1970 decision that said the use of the motto on U.S. coins and bills is “of a patriotic or ceremonial character and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious exercise.”
Newdow sought a rehearing of the case last April, but was denied in October. Two months after he asked the Supreme Court to review the decision, the case was dismissed without comment.
The Obama administration and the Pacific Justice Institute, a Sacramento-based legal defense organization, argued against Newdow, saying court precedent called for the case to be dismissed.
- ADELLE M. BANKS, Religion News Service



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

Confessions of a Preacher’s Daughter
She’s the star of “This Is Our Time.” She played Kirk Cameron’s wife in the surprise blockbuster “Fireproof.” But she grew up as the pastor’s kid at a megachurch. Was Erin Bethea the stereotypical fast-driving, hard-drinking, boy-teasing, cigar-smoking preacher’s daughter? After all,

posted 12:04:02pm Apr. 23, 2013 | read full post »

Focus on the Family’s President Says It’s Time to “Refocus”
 It’s tough out there in the culture wars and Jim Daly has the battle scars to prove it. But does the top executive of Focus on the Family believe he can ever successfully declare

posted 10:24:18am Mar. 14, 2013 | read full post »

5-week Bible special a labor of love for famous TV producer and 'Touched by an Angel' wife
It’s a passion project. The new 10-hour mini-series The Bible is “a story of enduring love,” says Mark Burnett, producer of TV mega-hits Survivor (CBS), The Voice (NBC), The Celebrity Apprentice (NBC), and Shark Tank (ABC). “It’s many, many stories that have endured over thousands of ye

posted 4:47:19am Feb. 21, 2013 | read full post »

Who should be allowed to pray for Obama?
It seems preposterous, but there’s a major debate over who is worthy to invoke the presence and blessing of the Almighty on the leaders of this land we love! So, who is qu

posted 1:59:32pm Jan. 15, 2013 | read full post »

Do parents have a say in what schools teach?
Should a Hindu foundation be allowed to finance yoga instruction in California grade schools – despite vehement parental objections? Should a student production featuring cross-dressing and gender confusion go ahead in Utah despite protests from furious parents? [caption id="attachment_12003" a

posted 4:11:31pm Jan. 07, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(24)
post a comment
cknuck

posted March 8, 2011 at 6:51 pm


This guy is just amazingly bitter, what injury? If he is that delicate he should live in a cave on an island.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted March 8, 2011 at 6:59 pm


This atheist is sticking to “In God We Trust”, like a tick on a dog without Frontline, Plus.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted March 8, 2011 at 9:54 pm


I don’t see bitterness. I see a dedicated guy trying to do a valuable job that’s Politically Incorrect. He doesn’t stand a chance and that’s a shame.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted March 8, 2011 at 11:08 pm


“E Pluribus Unum” is a better motto anyway.



report abuse
 

Anton Batey

posted March 9, 2011 at 6:11 am


Michael Newdow is awesome. I wish him luck and hope that is successful.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted March 9, 2011 at 9:38 am


Theologically speaking, I have some issue with mixing God and politics on currency. It seems to cheapen God and it calls into question the viability of the seperation of Church and State. At the same time, I think the same phrase spoils the poetry of the Pledge of Allegiance. It sounds more like it was spliced in, which it was, than if it was intended.
These interjectins of public piety fly in the face of Jesus’ teachings – see Matthew 6, the verses preceding him planting the seed that blossoms into the Lord’s Prayer. Could these interjections simply be one more way to appease people who have such short attention spans that they forget God’s continual presence? Otherwise they are violating Jesus’ lesson against vain PDAs (public displays of affiliation).



report abuse
 

Carl Hoffman

posted March 9, 2011 at 10:48 am


the only reason this issue is considered “controversial” instead of obviously unconstitutional is that we Americans are immersed in a virtual Christian dictatorship like fish in water who also take their environment for granted.
nonreligious Americans have tolerated the smug self-satisfied attitude and privileges of believers for far too long. unlike churchgoers, i will get a ticket if i arrogantly double-park and block the street.
the fact that the courts are just as caught up in all this as everyone else is a very dangerous situation. as a result, they are not doing their jobs but instead rule in favor of established tradition and according to their own prejudices rather than upholding the Constitution.



report abuse
 

Jyl

posted March 9, 2011 at 1:17 pm


It could say in “in gods we trust” or “in Gd we trust” or “in money we trust”…
I don’t care what is says, I don’t mind either way.
It is only money, it can’t force an Atheist to worship G-d.
But then again I don’t think I would like it to say “in jesus we trust.” huh?
Well, the government can put what it wants on its own currency. I am not going to complain.
Wonder what would happen if they wrote “in Satan we trust?”



report abuse
 

Valerie

posted March 9, 2011 at 3:44 pm


If people have to have “God” on money to remember their beliefs, there’s a serious problem there. Government and God don’t work well together, that’s obvious. Keep them separate.



report abuse
 

RAY WATSON

posted March 9, 2011 at 4:25 pm


IF I WERE GOD, I WOULD STRIKE DEAD ANYONE WHO BROUGHT SUCH A SUIT OR SUPPORTED THE BRINGING OF SUCH A SUIT, IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT WOULD BE OBVIOUS GOD HAD STRUCK THEM DEAD ON THE SPOT. MAKYBE SOME THEN WOULD UNDERSTAND GOD IS.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted March 9, 2011 at 5:34 pm


Ray, “God” isn’t. Sorry about that. As you correctly point out a real god could convince a lot of people, presumably something it wants. But none does. Conclusion: none is.
As far as the motto, it’s just a bad motto. It’s divisive – it doesn’t apply to a large number of us. Many of us don’t think there is a god and of those who do think there’s one many don’t trust it.
It’s a bad motto.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted March 9, 2011 at 7:20 pm


Sorry Ray—guess god didn’t understand she was supposed to do what you wanted—nor did she appoint you to take her place. (which is great).
There has never been a reason to have the word god either in our Pledge or on our money. I never state the “under God” when saying the Pledge as I have never agreed with it—old enough to have learned it without the ridiculious words added–but I can’t remove it from our currency. But since I only spend it and not read it everytime, guess I and others will unfortunately have to continue to live with. It doesn’t represent who I believe in—but it implys that everyone in this country does believe in a god and trust her/him.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted March 9, 2011 at 9:47 pm


JEST YOU TEACH THE BIBLE SIDEWAYS, JESUS MADE THE ULTIMATE PUBLIC DISPLAY OF AFFILIATION ON THE CROSS. I SEE YOU STILL ARE THE ATHEIST’S BEST RESOURCE.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted March 9, 2011 at 10:03 pm


cknuck—Isn’t there something about stone tossing in your reference book when judging others?



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted March 10, 2011 at 6:15 am


Could be he overlooked the “not”.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted March 10, 2011 at 12:11 pm


Dietrich Bonhoeffer calls it cheap grace:
Cheap grace is the grace we bestow on ourselves . . . the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, communion without confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship
pagan in your defense this may go over your head but jest will know that’s why he does not get a pass. nnmns you nurture a hatred for God



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted March 10, 2011 at 1:40 pm


Such arrogance to shout at Jestrfyl, but you do have freedom of speech, very much like Westboro Church does, only on beliefnet.



report abuse
 

PamFromNY

posted March 10, 2011 at 1:42 pm


God would probably prefer his name be removed from our money since America does not represent Him anymore. Just my opinion. Preserving “In God We Trust” by no means will save this nation.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted March 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm


Pam from NY, God loves us all, money is of no importance to Him. Only to man if you want to eat, sleep with a roof over your head, cover your body, stay well, and all those insignificant things. How’s the weather today in N.Y.?



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted March 10, 2011 at 3:09 pm


cknuck you are incapable of learning. I don’t hate your god any more than I hate the Easter Bunny.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted March 11, 2011 at 1:12 am


H, really? “All though insignificant things?” God clearly talks about giving (money) it is the only thing He said to test Him on. People worship with their money so it is important to God. So much misinformation.
nnmns you are a amazingly transparent liar, you don’t spend time putting down the Easter bunny, but you do spend an enormous amount of time and energy trying to put down God. Good luck with the bunny bull.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted March 11, 2011 at 12:05 pm


Hard to remember the Easter Bunny or hate her when it isn’t even Easter yet! Gracious.



report abuse
 

Tray

posted March 11, 2011 at 10:46 pm


It all comes down to the fact that it just doesn’t belong on currency in the first place. There is no denying that it fundamentally conflicts with a separation of church and state. As an atheist myself, it really doesn’t hurt me any that it’s on there it’s just silly. Why doesn’t it just say “We like hamburgers.” Sure, it would offend the vegetarians, but would probably reflect roughly the same majority of Americans. Not to mention, it is a statement that would have just as much of a reason to be on the currency.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted March 14, 2011 at 12:43 am


God has never conflicted with separation of church and state, it was never the intent to athelize the state against God. (I know I invented a word but it is true) It was never the intention of the founders to kick God out of government. The church has always served this country from the revolution till now.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.