Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Church of England to allow gay bishops — sort of

By AL WEBB
c. 2011 Religion News Service

LONDON (RNS) The Church of England has issued a set of “legal guidelines” that pave the way for openly gay clergy to become bishops — so long as they are and promise to remain celibate.

Details of the internal report, entitled “Choosing Bishops,” were carried by Christian Today, an independent London-based publication, on its website on Monday (June 20).

The new guidelines aim to bring church policy in line with Britain’s Equality Act, passed in 2010, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

The guidance says “openly gay clergy can become bishops so long as they are celibate,” according to the Christian Today report. The Equality Act would not allow gay clergy to be prohibited solely because they are gay.

“A person’s sexual orientation is, in itself, irrelevant to their suitability for episcopal office,” the guidelines said, and “it would be wrong if account were taken of the fact that a candidate had identified himself as of gay sexual orientation.”

The document continues that while the earlier guidelines “make it clear that someone in a sexually active relationship outside marriage is not eligible” to become bishop, that does not necessarily apply to a celibate relationship.

The church makes a strong distinction between “sexually active” and “celibate.” As one observer put it, the new guidelines demand that gay clergy are being asked to “make a promise that they are and will remain celibate.”

The legal advice in “Choosing Bishops” is expected to go before the church’s General Synod when it convenes in York, England, in July.



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

Confessions of a Preacher’s Daughter
She’s the star of “This Is Our Time.” She played Kirk Cameron’s wife in the surprise blockbuster “Fireproof.” But she grew up as the pastor’s kid at a megachurch. Was Erin Bethea the stereotypical fast-driving, hard-drinking, boy-teasing, cigar-smoking preacher’s daughter? After all,

posted 12:04:02pm Apr. 23, 2013 | read full post »

Focus on the Family’s President Says It’s Time to “Refocus”
 It’s tough out there in the culture wars and Jim Daly has the battle scars to prove it. But does the top executive of Focus on the Family believe he can ever successfully declare

posted 10:24:18am Mar. 14, 2013 | read full post »

5-week Bible special a labor of love for famous TV producer and 'Touched by an Angel' wife
It’s a passion project. The new 10-hour mini-series The Bible is “a story of enduring love,” says Mark Burnett, producer of TV mega-hits Survivor (CBS), The Voice (NBC), The Celebrity Apprentice (NBC), and Shark Tank (ABC). “It’s many, many stories that have endured over thousands of ye

posted 4:47:19am Feb. 21, 2013 | read full post »

Who should be allowed to pray for Obama?
It seems preposterous, but there’s a major debate over who is worthy to invoke the presence and blessing of the Almighty on the leaders of this land we love! So, who is qu

posted 1:59:32pm Jan. 15, 2013 | read full post »

Do parents have a say in what schools teach?
Should a Hindu foundation be allowed to finance yoga instruction in California grade schools – despite vehement parental objections? Should a student production featuring cross-dressing and gender confusion go ahead in Utah despite protests from furious parents? [caption id="attachment_12003" a

posted 4:11:31pm Jan. 07, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(13)
post a comment
cknuck

posted June 20, 2011 at 6:46 pm


didn’t work for the RCC and it won’t work here homosexuality cannot be holy it is a malady that is beyond understanding that is one among many diversions from normal sexuality. Normal sexuality is a challenge to beg holy homosexuality is even more because it starts out sinful in nature a sin of the body (temple).



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted June 20, 2011 at 8:25 pm


Is someone going to follow them around to make sure they are “behaving” themselves? If you are going to “allow” them to be bishops, they should not put restrictions on them, IMO.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted June 20, 2011 at 10:48 pm


Are straight bishops required to remain celibate as well?



report abuse
 

Salcia

posted June 21, 2011 at 7:12 am


@ Mordred – To the best of my knowledge, Anglican bishops who have married women have not been required to remain celibate in the past. I guess anybody unmarried is expected to stay celibate in most brands of Christianity . . . but the difference for gay people is that they don’t have the option of a religious (or sometimes even secular) marriage to the person they love. So this is hardly a progressive step, imho.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted June 21, 2011 at 1:09 pm


So do the heterosexual clergy have to identify themselves and make the same pledge? Do they get different badges or stripes on their ecclesiastical gowns? Are they singled out and separated for different treatment?

No? The why create a separate tier of clergy? This is simple foolishness designed to pander to the fears of some people who cannot to relate, let alone accept anyone who is slightly different. The Table of CHrist is wide and long, the gates to God’s house are open and the light of Christ is lit for all ALL people or it is not on at all. I hink the lights are out and the door is locked at C of E



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 21, 2011 at 6:12 pm


jest, what a trouble maker you know that the celibate clause is for all single clergy don’t be such a worldly trouble maker you know that is sinful.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted June 22, 2011 at 12:03 am


ck
All the Good guys in the Bible were trouble makers. None of them toed the line or were satisfied with the status quo. This ain’t sin, brother – this is doing God’s work! Jesting just makes it jolly.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 22, 2011 at 12:55 am


jest the good guys worked for God not Satan, nor did they jest about what is holy, the other guys did that.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted June 22, 2011 at 10:52 am


ck
They most assuredly jested about what some folks thought was holy. Jesus and other redefined “holy” as that which awakens people to God’s UNconditional love. All the other rules and reg’s were commentary at best and obstacles for most (check with Paul for this one).



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted June 22, 2011 at 9:05 pm


Non-conservative Christians (and non-Christians for that matter) don’t work for the devil, ck. That you think that shows how detached from reality you are.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 22, 2011 at 10:11 pm


define reality mordred, anyway you cut it your view is limited



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 23, 2011 at 11:50 pm


jest Paul is one of the biggest supporters of one man one woman and he had nothing good to say about homosexuality how can you twist the gospel to suit your perverted whims. Quote Paul saying any thing about continued sin.



report abuse
 

Lauren

posted August 31, 2011 at 6:50 pm


What does Gods word have to say about this?????????????????????????????????
Thats ALL that matters. Not what any MAN thinks!!!! What is the word of God for if we are not going to obey it? Hate the sin LOVE the sinner. :)



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.