Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Proposed fed rules would disqualify Jesus, Good Samaritan, says cardinal

Good Samaritan

New federal guidelines are so narrow that Jesus himself would not qualify for the Department of Health and Human Services “religious employer exemption,” says Cardinal Daniel DiNardo. Neither would the Good Samaritan.

The HHS rules has so many rules that “it protects almost no one, said DiNarto, chair of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities. Both would be disqualified because they had a record of “helping people who did not share their view of God,” notes Jeremy Kryn of LifeSiteNews, a Christian advocacy website.

DiNardo was citing the HHS requirement that goes  into effect in 2012 requiring all insurance programs nationwide to cover all forms of contraception — including aborion-inducing drugs and sterilization as “preventive services for women.”

Under the mandate only faith-based institutions that serve members of the same faith would be able to claim an exemption, thereby excluding any religious organizations that offer their services to the general public regardly of their religious affilication — or lack thereof.

The cardinal accused the HHS of “a distorted view of sexuality and a disdain for the role of religion,” during the USCCB’s 40th annual “Respect Life Month” observed during October, noted Kryn:

“The decision [by HHS] is wrong on many levels,” the cardinal said. “Preventive services are aimed at preventing diseases (e.g., by vaccinations) or detecting them early to aid prompt treatment (e.g., screening for diabetes or cancer). But pregnancy is not a disease…. Mandating such coverage shows neither respect for women’s health or freedom, nor respect for the consciences of those who do not want to take part in such problematic initiatives,” he said.

The cardinal blasted the Obama administration for their “misguided efforts to foster false values among our youth, to silence the voice of moral truth in the public domain, and to deprive believers of their constitutionally-protected right to live according to their religious convictions.”

Comments

Powered by Facebook Comments



Previous Posts

After years of terror, corruption, cancer-stricken Chavez cries out to Jesus on state TV
After years of criticizing the church, kicking out Christian missionaries, assisting terrorists and praising atheists, Venezuela’s mercurial strongman, Hugo Chavez, came home from a botched cancer treatment in Cuba, then took to Venezuela’s airwaves to call out to Christ for help. “Giv

posted 3:30:35pm May. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Understanding Christian Political Engagement
Guest Blogger: Bethany Blankley Pastor Charles Worley of Maiden, North Carolina created a firestorm among Christians and non-Christians when he suggested that homosexuals be rounded up and put inside electrical fences, left to die. Obviously, this is not the Christian message of loving our neighb

posted 10:10:12am May. 24, 2012 | read full post »

Why would "anti-bullying" youth convention speaker mock the Bible, Christian teens?
The report is difficult to believe: A paid “anti-bullying” expert is caught on video ranting at a national convention of high schoolers and is recorded bullying the Christian kids who were offended by his obscenities. They quietly follow his advice to homosexual youth in his “It Gets Better Pr

posted 10:54:19am May. 18, 2012 | read full post »

Are Americans finding God in cyberspace?
Will the church of the future be on line? We seem to be heading that way, says think-tank president Ron Sellers who points to recent findings that among American adults who use the Internet, 44 percent use it for religious purposes.  "This is particularly common among younger Americans," say

posted 1:14:32pm May. 17, 2012 | read full post »

Are "unacceptable religions" fatal for U.S. presidential candidates?
Is there an unwritten religious litmus test for the U.S. presidency? Do voters require candidates to be "not just religious, but acceptably religious"? Yes, say Northwest Nazarene University professors Steve Shaw and Darrin Grinder. [caption id="attachment_11319" align="alignleft" width="480" cap

posted 12:56:17pm May. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
jestrfyl

posted September 30, 2011 at 4:56 pm


The whole point to the parable is that even the Good Samaritan would not qualify. That is why the story stung! It was not a gentle, soothing word of advice – it was a condemnation of exclusion and the sense of privilege that came with being the dominant religion. This is a lesson we NEED to learn in America today!



report abuse
 

Cate

posted October 2, 2011 at 7:47 am


Of course allah is religious. Nothing like promoting killing, hatred, jihad, and that heaven is a (w….) house with 72 virgins waiting for this trash. This is religion??



report abuse
 

Cate

posted October 2, 2011 at 7:57 am


Need to mention about those 72 virgins…. they are really 72 little Catholic nuns with big baseball bats. Hurry up, jihadists!



report abuse
 

Patsy Davis

posted October 2, 2011 at 8:05 am


I feel sorry for the Dept. of Health if they discredit Jesus for His way of curing health problems. THEY ARE DEAD WRONG!!!!!!!!!! Maybe they are non-believers! I know for a fact that if it had not been for Jesus’ healing, I wouldn’t be able to live through each day. I am disabled and cannot work and I depend upon Jesus just to get me through each day. The government agencies should do the same.



report abuse
 

Adeleke

posted October 2, 2011 at 12:01 pm


I think there are members of the senate to review bills proposed by the presidency. If any individual has any issue with a proposed bill, the people concerned should have made their opinions known in advance.
Besides, the whole argument is not clear, a religious organization is bound to offer protection to all that come to it, that was the essence of Jesus’ teachings in the Bible.
As an advanced democracy and economy, the people tend to shy from their responsibilities of contributing to the robustness of any bill sent to the senate or other legislative arm in the US!



report abuse
 

timby

posted October 2, 2011 at 1:38 pm


This is another example of PC. Our elected officials don’t want to be stamped as racists. Neither do they want to labeled as having any stand on any important issue. This might offend the wrong folks so as to not get their votes. I believe the Bible states what is to happen to folks that are ashamed of the Lord.



report abuse
 

Jeannemarie Simon

posted October 4, 2011 at 12:00 pm


I don’t think Jesus would worry about not being “religious enough.” The bishops may not be aware that Americans of other persuasions (or even Catholics) don’t think bishops infallible but disagree with them in good conscience.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.