Advertisement
Welcome to One City. You've lived here your whole life, whether you know it or not. One City blog is an outgrowth of The Interdependence Project, a Buddhist-inspired nonprofit organization led by Ethan Nichtern, dedicated to teaching the insights of Buddhism, meditation, mindfulness, and interconnectedness in the 21st century world.
If you're interested in how your mind works, are interested in meditation (but don't want to pretend you live in ancient Asia), care about the world, are into media, love contemporary culture, and above all, really dig the truth of interdependence-that nothing happens in a vacuum--then this blog is for you.
You write,
"I think we need to reassess our understanding of what meditation is and how it is helpful."
I strongly suggest you also reassess your understanding of what clinical depression is. Mitsunen Roshi's issues were not clinical depression, and the word "depression" did not appear in Chip Brown's article. Clinical depression is a significant mood disorder that requires a very different treatment from psychoanalysis.
There's a common but harmful conceit amont many western Buddhists that meditation is all you need to combat clincical depression. Buddhist meditation can be a significant help for people recovering from depression, but profound depression requires medical treatment. Meditation can't "cure" it any more than it can cure a broken leg.
Chip Brown himself obviously is not a practitioner, and his misunderstandings of Buddhist teachings on emptiness and several other things mar the article. I think you have to look through Brown's misunderstandings to the more interesting question, which is how Mitsunen Roshi's understanding of himself confounded his practice, and how a transmitted teacher was still struggling with what might seem to be beginner-level issues.
Sorry, I did not say it was about clinical depression. My reference to depression was tangential to that article and more in regards to discussions on the One City Blog. Perhaps I should have made that more clear. My main point is that meditation as suppression or avoidance is not a Buddhist teaching
I thought the article was a good work of journalism, well-written and compelling. As the story unfolded, it became clear that a man who needed to work through issues had been *using* Buddhist theories of emptiness to justify his avoidance. This seems to me as possible as a person using therapy to futher indulge in thier own neurosis, using religion to justify self-righteousness, using altruism to justify treating those closest to them poorly and so forth. I will admit that I think the article leaned (really only leaned) in the direction of accusing Buddhism of imperfection, but what came at me way more from that article is how easily pursuits, however noble or beneficial they may seem (like meditation)can be used to mask what is going on.
Point being, all media articles have to make some lame point about "the Way We Are" because that's what editors want. But the piece was better as a character study.
And besides, depression is a huge, leaf covered trap in Buddhism that you can fall into without even realizing it. It's useful to have articles about it.
That's me above. CAPTCHA TEXT IS MY ENEMY.
Absolutely: meditation is not about suppression or avoidance. But it appears to be a common misunderstanding or misapplication of practice, even by experienced practitioners. I have to believe we have all done it and will do it, but we have to be able to notice it. Or we need teachers who can notice it in us and point it out.
I was recently reading Pema Chodron's No Time to Lose and she noted how surprised she was to realize, when she first started practicing lojong (Tibetan mind training)how much she was still holding onto "good" and trying to avoid "bad" feelings.
My fave lojong slogan on this is "Don't Make Gods Into Demons" (along with "Abandon Poisonous Food") Pema notes:
--------------
"Abandon poisonous food" and "Don't make gods into demons" are warnings that only you know whether what you are doing is good practice ("gods" or "good food"). Anything could be used to build yourself up and smooth things over and calm things down or to keep everything under control. Good food becomes poisonous food and gods become demons when you use them to keep yourself in that room with the doors and windows closed.
From Start Where You Are: A Guide to Compassionate Living by Pema Chodron, (c)1994, Shambhala Publications.
Julia, I totally agree. We humans can and will use ANYTHING to avoid facing what is going on. Even buddhist practice.
But hopefully, buddhist practice includes that awareness and helps us cut thru that baseline confusion we have. Cuz somewhere in there in everyone is the awareness that we all really know this is going on, anyway.
At one point in college I thought Buddhism and meditation was about finding this kind of mental blank "white space" and staying there 24 hours a day. I was going to activist nonviolence trainings at the same time, and misunderstanding those too. and the result was a kind of aggressively passive, in-denial-of-feelings, Sarah. Not surprisingly, I was depressed during that time.
Luckily, books like Epstein's "Open To Desire" and many others (and the um, Book of Life), helped me understand that Buddhism --whether on or off the cushion-- is not about pushing away feeling (or desire), and I think I'm finally getting better at finding productive ways to experience emotion without being run over by it OR running it over with control. Good luck to everyone.
I have no problem with Chip Brown's article - I don't think he distorts anything, particularly. For the most part he lets Nordstrom express his understanding of the Zen training he received in his own words. Nordstrom reports on Zen teacher told him in 1987, “What you need to do, Lou, is put aside all human feelings.” Maybe Nordstrom had unhelpful teachers, maybe he misunderstood instructions, who knows, but that's not Chip Brown's fault.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.