Pontifications

The soul of "The Dark Knight"

Tuesday July 22, 2008

Categories: Pop Culture

Batman and Joker.jpg It is a dark soul indeed, and that is what makes the movie--which I saw last (k)night--so powerful.

I can't qualify as a comic-book or action-hero or sci-fi geek (though my geekiness is evident in other areas), and I am completely insensate as far as the whole LOTR phenomenon and its ilk go. (I love using "LOTR" as it took me so long to figure out what it meant.) But for whatever reason I do invest a great deal of anticipation into these summer comic blockbusters, if only the first Spider-Man movie really paid off for me. Perhaps it is the appeal of religious themes that are veiled enough to seem literary yet obvious enough so that I don't have to try too hard to discern them, and thus can feel smart as I exit the theater parsing its various ideas and metaphors.

Several threads emerge brightly from The Dark Knight, not least of which is my own (surely it's been noted elesewhere in all the blogosphere blather) clear sense of the wartime warnings of how easily we can be corrupted by fear, and thus enlisted in the project of evil. Besides DC Comics, a good companion reader to the film would be Jane Mayer's disturbing new book, "The Dark Side," about the moral and legal corruption of the Bush White House and the "war on terror."

It is a corruption we all share, however, and which the movie suggests we can all choose to defeat, as well.

The principal drama though, is about how that corruption tempts those most involved in the fight of good and evil, as we all should be, and the moral ambiguity is as dense as some of the action sequences. "You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain," as Alfred tells Bruce.

Speaking of action, there are some of the usual missteps, for me, like video-game action sequences you can't follow without a rewind button (granted, I'm middle-aged) and key bits of dialogue rendered inaudible by the heaving soundtrack. The sonar-cellphone technology was weird and way too confusing to watch; don't know how Bruce Wayne figured out what was happening inside that fishbowl or a mask. And lots of terrible wounds that never hurt. But some funny moments and lines...Such as when The Joker tells Batman, "You complete me." Take that, Katie Holmes, via Tom Cruise.

Heath Ledger--The Joker.jpgThat mutual embrace of good and evil, however, is at the heart of the film, and what makes it so good--and so disturbing. A friend of mine, a pseudo-geek but by no means a prude, wondered if the movie should be rated R.

Over at the Dallas Morning News, the omnivorous Jeff Weiss has several posts which get at the dark heart of the matter, including a parsing of the classic "Trolley Question" which provides the drama of the finale (and is the favored plot device for so many shows these days, like "24," that some poor social scientist should be getting royalties.) But Jeff also gets at the darker side of merchandising such violence to kids. Jeff writes:

"Dark Knight" is a staggeringly violent and disturbing film. Thought-provoking for adults, but potentially terrifying for children. Yeah, yeah, marketers can say they're just playing off the longstanding Batman "brand." But these products will make kids beg to see the movie -- and will dupe less-attentive parents into thinking it's a safe "comic book" flick. The PG-13 rating should offer some warning, yes. But this film dances just south of an R in my book.

Jeff also points to a very Christian take on the film by a Halifax, Va., pastor, Mike Parnell, who writes at EthicsDaily.com, who calls it the best movie of 2008 so far, and notes its Clockwork Orange references. Over at First Things, Thomas Hibbs has a longer reflection (it is First Things, after all) on director Christopher Nolan's "achievement," which is a comprehensive wrap.

Of course the presence Heath Ledger, who died from a drug overdose after the movie wrapped, and whose almost steals the show with his protryal of the Joker, makes all of this moralizing both more dangerous--it's a movie, after all, and he was a real person who suffered a real tragedy. But Ledger's real story also makes it more poignant, pointing toward the dark night that awaits.

Advertisement
Comments
Florence H.
July 23, 2008 12:39 AM

We desperately need priests who are in a teaching capacity to see this movie...soon...so they can explain to parents the need to BE parents and not to get talked into letting their children see this morally and psychologically harmful movie. Some parents just don't care. They say they do and priests say they do, too, but is anyone investing the time in finding out about these kinds of movies? There is at least one priest I know who does care, and God bless him.

Jurgen Adams
July 23, 2008 4:34 AM

Dark knight is a poisonous movie, bad for the soul. See more at

www.moviesintofilm.com/dark_knight.htm

New Age Cowboy
July 23, 2008 5:36 AM

Florence H. & Jurgen Adams:
I'm not completely sure about your trick; but, just in case, there's better ways to spend our time than condemning movies.
I grew up in the 80s and my parents did prevent me from seeing "Temple of Doom" and "Gremlins", the much hyped and violent movies of '84. *Actually, "Temple of Doom" was a big part of the reason for PG-13 and should serve as a hint for what passes for PG-13.*
I don't think it's that hard for parents to prevent there young kids from going to the multi-plex. Kids under 13 should be accompanied by an adult.
To boot, there's also several other more family friendly versions of BATMAN... like 4 other BATMAN movies since Michael Keaton donned the costume and countless direct to video BATMAN cartoons.
If you find something offensive, we live in a free country - simply ignore it or shut it off.
Example: After enough BS and lies with the Iraq war, I simply stopped watching our lousy president on the television. If he came on, I simply changed the channel.

Qiana M Davis
July 23, 2008 11:46 PM

The live long enough to see yourself become the villain quote was said by Harvey Dent to Bruce not Alfred and Katie Holmes is not in the Dark Knight.Maggie Gylenhal took over her role. Other than that good article. I thoroughly enjoyed Dark Knight for its duality and exploration of humanity. While its too violent for real young kids,its no more "poisonous"for teens than some schools,neighborhoods,and people their exposed to on a daily basis. Parents and society need to stop trying to put ALL the blame on movies and other media. Step up and accept responsibility for what your child learns! It starts in the homes!

Greg
July 27, 2008 1:47 PM

Parents definitely should step up as the last person suggests. But I agree with the second that parents need some guidance, from priests or otherwise. Because many kids will not understand why they can see other PG-13 movies but not see the biggest blockbuster (potentially of them all, financially-speaking) with an equal rating. But this movie is too sophisticated, morally ambivalent, and violent to be appropriate for most children. But how will parents know that it is a far-cry from the also PG-13 The Mummy Returns for example. As far as villains go, most kids are not ready to understand the Joker. For that matter, as an adult, I'm not sure I'm ready to understand the joker. So, please, priests and other public figures, help parents out.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About Pontifications

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Catholicism in our Catholic forums.

David Gibson is an award-winning religion writer who specializes in writing about the Catholic Church, which he joined as a convert at the age of 30. He is the author The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. He also wrote The Coming Catholic Church: How the Faithful are Shaping a New American Catholicism. He has written about Catholicism for leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, New York magazine, Boston magazine, Fortune, Commonweal, and America. Gibson worked in Rome for Vatican Radio for several years and traveled frequently with Pope John Paul II. He later covered religion for The Star-Ledger of New Jersey. He has co-written several recent documentaries on Christianity for CNN. For further information check out his website at dgibson.com.

Search This Blog

David's Books:

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_coming.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.