Pontifications

"Humanae Vitae"--The Pill, pedophile priests, and the real story

Monday August 4, 2008

Categories: Bishops, Catholic, Church , Pope
An earlier post on the 40th anniversay of Pope Paul VI's encyclical on contraception and procreation, "Humanae Vitae," referred to various doom-and-gloom scenarios that champions of the teaching attributed to our wayward rejection of the encyclical's reasoning and conclusions. Among...
Advertisement
Comments
DG
August 4, 2008 12:03 PM

An interesting premise, "the widespread rejection of the pope's comprehensive ban on artificial contraception is that it is one of the causes of pedophilia in the priesthood and the sexual abuse scandal"

If we take that logic of that premise one step farther and remember that the pope rejected the the bishops objections against humanae vitae and issued it anyway, then we have to conclude that it was the pope's failure to heed the wisdom of his bishops, in other words, it was irresponsible action of the pope that became the principal cause of pedophilia in the priesthood and the subsequent scandal. If on the other hand, the pope had acted responsibly and heeded the advise of the bishops, then the we can conclude that the pedophila and subsequent scandal would not have occurred.

Of course, in order to reach either of these conclusions, or the conclusions presented in the article, we have to ignore the fact that pedophilia has been a problem in the priesthood long before humanae vitae was even conceived, but hey, lets not let insignificant things, such as evidence and facts get in the way.

edgleason
August 4, 2008 4:07 PM

This stupid 'it all began in the 60s' argument is 6 years old. It was the first bishop response to the 'scandal' The ignoring of HV loosened the priests' morality so that pedphilia became OK in their minds is re-heated garbage... can we now extend this stupid reasoning to the parish embezzlement scandals? Sounds like an aurgument made by Wall Street cons.'We're all crooks'
Maybe when in 1968 the 'Red'students disrupted Ratzingers classes and he 'freaked' out and became a conservative is an example of how we ended up with cowardly leaders.Afraid to lead..Afraid to change.

gmo2
August 4, 2008 4:52 PM

All of this would be laughable if it were not tragic. The sexual abuse scandal was obviously caused by the failure of the church's leadership to act properly against priests who were pedophiles. I wonder if that is what the Pope told the victims of sexual abuse when he met with them, "You know, all of this could have been prevented if you people had only followed HV." Somehow, I don't think he did.

In terms of what John Allen said, "The central point of 'Humanae Vitae' was that each and every act of sexual intercourse had to be free of any deliberate effort to prevent conception." Since natural family planning, the approved method of contraception, is a birth control methodology acts of intercourse using it are not free of any deliberate effort to prevent conception. They are planned to prevent conception. So if that was the central point of HV, then approving "natural" family planning defeated its central point.

Two major issues in the Church that have undermined its teachings are HV and the sexual scandal. Both can rightly be blamed on leadership in the church. The Bishop was correct when he said, "It's a pretty grim picture and it's going to be a long time before we recover from it." What he doesn't understand is that he is part of the cause.

Iris Alantiel
August 4, 2008 7:47 PM

If the sex abuse scandal didn't offend Catholics' sensibilities enough for the hierarchy's tastes, let's try this new method: "Hey there, laity, it's your fault our priests sinned! All those little kids whose futures have been complicated by sexual abuse - that's not because of us, it's because YOU were disobedient."

Also, I *really* hope somebody takes up gmo2's point about NFP being a deliberate effort to prevent conception. This was something I haven't quite been able to grasp about the distinction the Church is making between NFP and artificial birth control. I've been told that the difference is that NFP is still "open to life" even if you're trying to employ it in such a way as to prevent conception. But if God really wants me to be pregnant, is there any method of contraception He couldn't circumvent? As I'm understanding it, "open to life" (as applied to the use of NFP) seems like code for "this birth control is more likely than others to fail".

recovering ex-Pentecostal
August 5, 2008 4:22 PM

What a pious bunch of self-righteous blather this thread is.

Illogical, "re-heated garbage" that blames child-raping priests and their protectors on the birth control pill. Utter (and utterly unbelievable) nonsense.

Ann
August 8, 2008 12:15 AM

I'm with you, Iris. I assure you, we tried NFP. And tried and tried. But irregular cycles made all that fussing around with the calendar and the thermometer fruitless. And artificial in the extreme. And resulted in 4 (single) babies in 4 1/2 years. At that rate, it was extremely scary to think what the potential number might have been.

After the 4th , we tried the pill which was new enough then that even my doctor didn't know it would dry up my milk. Three in diapers and one who was VERY hungry. It was simpler just to get tubes tied. Only one visit to the confessional.

I wonder how many amateur AND professional theologians have EVER been in that situation, have any grasp of the stress that puts on marital and family relationships.

Oh yes, just have faith. Uhn-huh.

Pam
August 11, 2008 8:17 AM

HV basically turned the whole Catholic Church into a Protestant one. Most married Catholics use birth control and don't even confess it. They do not see it as a sin but as a matter for individuals to decide for themselves. This opened the door for more and more Catholics to pick and choose what they wanted to accept as Catholic doctrine for them. The pedophilia scandal furthered this kind of independent thinking as
Catholics would say to themselves, "If my priest is molesting little boys, why shouldn't I do the lesser sin of masturbating?" The horse is out of the barn and the barn is on fire. The church cannot bring back "the good old days" Any salvation lies in returning to the Gospel emphasis on love and forgiveness rather than doctrine and law.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About Pontifications

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Catholicism in our Catholic forums.

David Gibson is an award-winning religion writer who specializes in writing about the Catholic Church, which he joined as a convert at the age of 30. He is the author The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. He also wrote The Coming Catholic Church: How the Faithful are Shaping a New American Catholicism. He has written about Catholicism for leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, New York magazine, Boston magazine, Fortune, Commonweal, and America. Gibson worked in Rome for Vatican Radio for several years and traveled frequently with Pope John Paul II. He later covered religion for The Star-Ledger of New Jersey. He has co-written several recent documentaries on Christianity for CNN. For further information check out his website at dgibson.com.

Search This Blog

David's Books:

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_coming.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.