By choosing the longtime Senate insider and foreign policy expert, Joe Biden, as his running mate, Barack Obama is also gambling that having a Catholic on the ticket will draw in some of the fence-sitting Catholics whose votes will be key to success in November. Peeling away a few evangelical votes, or hoping for a low turnout by the Christian right, is a prayer. As I wrote here, the white, suburban evangelicals who are the bedrock of the GOP election strategy may respect Obama, at best. But he's not a member of the tribe, despite his thoroughgoing Christian bona fides, and it seems nothing will convince them otherwise.
Biden, however, is a strong bet in that he could--and should--play well with many Catholics. From abortion to his working-class background, he represents a viewpoint and a culture that resonate with the broad middle of Catholic opinion that finds the assertions of authoritative political opinion from right and left in the church highly dubious.
Consider Biden's abortion record, as set out here and here. Biden supports Roe v. Wade but backed a federal ban on late-term abortions and opposes public funding of abortion. His record is mixed, which was enough to earn him a NARAL rating (currently at 60 percent) as low as 39 percent in recent years--and NARAL pointedly has not endorsed Biden.
Moreover, Biden's compelling personal history--from his hardscrabble upbringing in a Catholic family (he breifly considered becoming a priest, as many Catholic boys of that era did) to the tragedy that claimed his wife and daughter, as well as his own near-death experience--have given him a broad perspective on life and a passionate commitment to fighting injustice. Much of his views, in fact, are grounded in Catholic social justice principles, which Obama seems to share intuitively. But Biden can speak to them much more cogently--and perhaps make up for his penchant for shooting from the lip.
A primary source would be this 2007 Christian Science Monitor profile, "A Frank and Abiding Faith," as well as this Pew biography and David Brooks' column from this week, "Hoping it's Biden."
Will the choice convince any of the knee-jerkers in the McCain camp? Of course not. For too many--on both aides--ideology and party loyalty trump deliberation and introspection, especially at this point in the campaign. You can already see the silly ads and dumb commentary all over the Web. Will the selection tip the "average voter"? Not so much. A Washington Post poll shows that three-quarters of voters said picking Biden would not sway their votes one way or the other. And about as many said they would be more apt to support Obama with Biden on the ticket as said the choice would make them less likely to vote Democratic on Election Day (13 to 10 percent).
But Biden's Catholic, working-class roots, especially in a key region like Scranton in a "keystone" state like Pennsylvania could play well not just there, but in other similar regions in other battleground states, as well as with Catholics as a whole--the true swing vote.
The risky part of Obama's gamble on Biden is that by picking a Catholic--and it wouldn't matter who--he risks reigniting the "wafer wars" (an unfortunately commonplace phrase which--this is an update of a previous version--I'll refrain from promoting further on advice of good counsel) that divide the faithful even more than they are. Given Biden's background and record, however, the Wafer Warriors will have to go some ways to dirty up Biden on the faith issue. As the Pew bio has it:
When the Diocese of Wilmington's bishop, Michael Saltarelli, came under pressure in 2004 and 2005 to deny communion to Biden and other Catholic politicians who support abortion rights, the bishop refused, saying through a diocesan spokesman that he "prefers prayer and active engagement" with politicians who take positions contrary to church doctrine; Biden refused to comment on the issue. Once again running for president, Biden said in April 2007 that his party must demonstrate it is "not afraid to deal with the faith issue."
On the other hand, Saltarelli's replacement, Bishop W. Francis Malooly, takes office on Sept 8, and his approach to Biden is unknown. Would he want to start his own term by courting such controversy? Most bishops--and Malooly is considered a deliberate fellow--would want to get to know one of their flock before making any drastic public moves, and that may be tough given Biden's coming campaign agenda.
Still, it'll be telling to see what blasts come at Biden from the usual Catholic suspects--and whether they will backfire in a way that would earn Obama-Biden more support than the ticket would have otherwise.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon

OBAMA CHAMPIONS “CULTURE OF DEATH”
February 27, 2008
In last night’s debate between Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton, MSNBC moderator Tim Russert asked both presidential candidates whether there was “any word or vote that you’d like to take back” in your “careers in public service.” Senator Obama cited his role in a unanimous decision by the U.S. Senate regarding the Terri Schiavo case. He said it was “a mistake” for the Congress “to interject itself into that decision-making process of the families” to settle her fate.
Catholic League president Bill Donohue addressed this issue today:
“So now we know that Obama thinks it was a mistake—the biggest mistake he’s ever made in public life—to allow Schiavo’s parents the right to petition a federal court over the withdrawal of food and medical services necessary to save her life. Never mind that the vote was merely procedural: it simply allowed the patient’s parents the right to ask for federal review, never guaranteeing a particular outcome. Moreover, the bill was case specific—it had no bearing on any case other than Schiavo’s, and it explicitly said that ‘nothing in this Act shall constitute a precedent with respect to future legislation.’ Yet Obama now says his vote ‘was not something I was comfortable with, but it was not something that I stood on the floor and stopped.’ How revealing.
“Just as important as what Obama said is what he didn’t say: He could have taken the opportunity to say that the biggest blunder of his career in public life was his vote to kill a bill in the Illinois legislature that would have provided medical care for infants who survive abortions. In 2003, while chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee of the Illinois Senate, he led the fight to oppose a bill that would have mandated health care for a baby who survived an abortion, and he did so even though the bill explicitly said it would not imperil Roe v. Wade.
“In conclusion, Senator Obama thinks it is none of the federal government’s business to allow doctors to intentionally starve a person to death, nor is it the law’s business to require doctors to attend to the health care of a fully born baby who has survived an abortion. All this from the Minister of Hope.”
They say that Christians should not get into politics but, when it infringes on faith and morals, it is up to Christians to speak up and defend the sanctity of God's laws.
Biden is a continuing number of people who call themsevles Catholic and then violate the most basic of Christian beliefs about abortion. If life is not the core issue---what is. Joe is against life. And remember his boss Obama said that if his daughter ever got pregnant---they would be an immediate abortion. They cleverly talk about abortion being rare and then go to NARAL and collect money from them. Which is it Joe, Obama, rare abortions or NARAL. Both Mrs. Clinton and Obama's wife attended a recent NARAL meeting to learn how to use language and other subterfuge that might persuade others they are serious about "life."
Maybe their own but not the babies of this world.
Obama and Biden believe in a woman's right to choose... a right that shouldn't be controlled by ANY church...the RCC or others, nor should it be controlled by the government. Both men are not mixing religion and politics, separation of church and state is being upheld by them. The decision is personal and no one elses business except the woman and those she wishes to include, if anyone. IMO,Biden isn't breaking any RCC rules. The right to terminate safely and privately should always exist. To deny that to any woman is a "sin." No one is forced to have an abortion, but in some cases... rape, incest and medical reasons, are just some that might have to be considered in deciding whether to continue a unplanned pregnancy.
I would never vote for Obama and Biden. I don't care what they call themselves, but anyone who believes in the killing of children who are not born yet is not a "God fearing man" in my book. The fact they they go under the pretense of Christianity only makes it worse. Plus as one of my friends said: "Obama is going to get elected, he'll pull us out of Iraq, the terrorists will see their chance and we're all going to die."
I wish we had more Bishop's like Michael Saltarelli.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.