I had just finished ordering our annual sheaf of seasonally tacky and nicely inexpensive Christmas cards–my three-year-old on a carousel in various stages of glee, below her a wish for joy to the world and peace in 2009 and all that stuff–when I received a link to Father Jim Martin’s annual Scrooge-fest on NPR. Titled “More Virgin Mary, Less Virgin Islands” (it came out on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception), Jim grumbles (well, in his very congenial way) about Christmas cards from even pious friends that have no Christmas scene but rather “a photo of a family on some beach in the Caribbean. Or a picture of somebody’s house. Or someone’s dog wearing reindeer horns.” He continues:
Look, I love family photos during the holidays. Plus, I actually read those annual holiday letters, all of which start with “What a busy year it’s been!” Seeing photos of my friends and their families and even enjoying a few sunny beach scenes when it’s cold and dark outside is a highlight of December.
But I enjoy the photos more when they’re inside the card, not the card itself. Because more and more, even devout Christians have been replacing Jesus, Mary and Joseph with themselves. Doesn’t it strike you as weird to set aside the Holy Family in favor of your family? Does a photo of Cabo San Lucas trump the story told by the original San Lucas? Is Christmas really about you?
I guess we all have our pet peeves. I tend (well, it’s more like an iron-clad reaction) to roll my eyes at those family newsletters that recount how wonderful the past year has been for them, and all the great places they went and things they bought. Our family used to sit around the dinner table coming up with our sad-sack tales (all too true) that we’d write up and send out the next Christmas. We never did, but it was fun to contemplate. And I must say, receiving the occassional card from justifiably proud new parents but with the phrase, “For unto us a child is born…” on the top makes me wince more than a bit.
Still, I think the good Jesuit is being a bit Jansenist. (And he is younger than I am. Barely.) Christmas has always been as much about family and secular festivities as it has been a strictly solemn, religious feast. I’ll admit that it wasn’t until I lived in Rome that I finally realized, during a holiday largely shorn of Santa-mania, that I came to truly appreciate Easter and place it in a proper context with Christmas. And as a single fellow with access to the Vatican Tipografia I could get their really awesome Christmas cards–high-quality, with boffo art from the in-house collection, and cheap.
But now life is different, and I like sending out a holiday card with my kid on it. In fact, I just sent one to Jim Martin, just to spite him. But I did use one of those lovely Botticelli Madonna and Child stamps (with John the Baptist this year).



posted December 16, 2008 at 11:18 am
Talk about wasting your breath. Those who harp on putting Christ back in Christmas are doing just that. We are who we are, and we do what we do. Each of us makes his or her own choice about such things. I’ve never seen the “putting Christ back into Christmas” thing make much of a difference.
I suspect the best way to put Christ back into Christmas is to do that in your own life and then to hope others are watching.
posted December 16, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Since our pilgrimage to Israel ten years ago, we’ve used a photo of some Holy Land site as our Christmas card, with snapshots of the kids tucked inside along with a pertinent, prophetic Scripture. The highlight year was a photoshopped Mount Zion. I wish I could find it now.
Anyway, this year, my husband finally got sick of it. We ran out of original ideas, so I bought mildly religious cards at a Hallmark. And always use the religious stamps.
posted December 19, 2008 at 8:45 pm
I enjoy all the Christmas cards I get for friends and relatives. If they are family pictures, Baby Jesus pictures, Holy Land pictures or landscapes of snow and beautiful trees. I still feel the love of God in all of them and I thank God for them.
I celebrate the conception of Jesus Christ at Christmas. Why? Because that is the time of year he was conceived by the Holy Spirit and His birth was in September. Study a little deeper in the book of Luke and with some knowledge of the Hebrew months and the things that took place during the time it was you could find the timeline of His conception and birth.
The religious people in the Bible were the ones that gave Jesus the trouble. I am not religious, I am a Christian. I love Our Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Thank God for Jesus Christ the Only Begotten Son.