Pontifications

Jesus in a Cheeto: Miracle or substantiation "con"?

Tuesday May 19, 2009

Cheeto Jesus.jpgYes, another "Cheesus," and again in Texas. We had one here last July, though it was Christ on the Cross--more than blasphemous enough for me. (And what it means for Protestant theology on the Eucharist, God knows.) This week's version is a more pastoral Lord, or prayerful. The Preston Hollow paper reports:

Bell came across the strange snack a few weeks ago while she and her husband, Dan, were driving home from Houston. He bought her a bag of Cheetos in Jersey Village, she said, and everything was normal until she was about a third of the way through it.

"Then Jesus appeared," Bell said with a laugh.

Until she decides what to do with the Cheeto, Bell is keeping it safe, wrapped in tissue inside a box that once held a wristwatch.

"What I've been worried about is if I have it around my house, it'll get eaten," the retired teacher said. "If not by a person, then by an ant." ...

"God is probably wherever you want to find God," said the Rev. Diana Holbert, pastor of Grace United Methodist Church in Old East Dallas. "It seems like a little bit of a waste of time, but who am I to judge?"

Some friends have told Bell to put her Cheeto on eBay. Others told her to try to get it on Ellen DeGeneres' talk show. But Matthews offered no such advice.
 
"I just told her I'm glad she's found Jesus," she said.
Yuk yuk. Right. Look, these things are such a staple of the culture it's easy, and advisable, to dismiss them, or pass them around as funny emails. Last November it was Christ in a French toast. And earlier this month a coffee stain BVM (Blessed Virgin Mary for you newbies here) got the Onion treatment from Jonathan Tilove, who was understandably looking for divine help after rough going in the media industry.
 
But is there something more "substantial" at work? In a "Sightings" essay a while back, religion scholar Jeremy Biles made some connections of his own:
 

"Why are we fascinated with coincidences and unexpected resemblances? Why are they so often at the root of our narratives? Because chance resemblances and fortuitous convergences solicit interpretation. That is, they call out to be treated not merely as random occurrences, but rather as symbols -- and symbols, philosopher of religion Paul Ricoeur writes, "give rise to thought." But what precisely is religious about this fascination?

"Some believe that seeing the Holy Mother in a stain on the wall is an instance of wish fulfillment; it confirms faith. But I think that another level of wish fulfillment is at work. Humans partake of a desire for what astonishes -- the irruption of the heterogeneous into the monotonous, the transformation of the everyday into the extraordinary. Coincidences, resemblances, and repetitions respond to a wish for the paranormal, the supernatural. And this desire compels a religio-aesthetic interpretation of life that engages the imagination and invigorates the soul.

"So when Jesus appears on tortilla, it is not -- or not only -- the sacred figure that makes the artifact "religious," for the religious visage is a second-order representation; it simply makes more literal the seemingly supernatural quality of the fortuitous likeness. It is the resemblance itself that is miraculous.

"Coincidences and chance resemblances inject our lives with something beyond quotidian reality, making of everyday existence a metaphysical expedition, an ongoing adventure of interpretive engagement. And whether they are, in fact, signs written by a divine author or random occurrences, coincidences and resemblances become kernels of stories that enhance the meaning of our lives. They give rise to thought, they exercise our symbolic faculties, they arouse and focus our attention -- and attention, it has been said, is the natural prayer of the soul."

Then again, it could just be all about our neurons: as this NYT--with a great image gallery--story reports, it's all about the face-recognition "software" in our brains:
 

Dr. Tsao's investigation yielded a surprising related finding: areas of the brain she had identified as face-specific occasionally lighted up in response to objects that bore only a passing resemblance to faces.

"Nonface objects may have certain features that are weakly triggering these face cells," she said. "If you go above a certain threshold, the monkeys might think that they're seeing a face." In the same way, she said, objects like cinnamon buns, rocky outcroppings and cloud formations may set off face radar if they bear enough resemblance to actual faces.

 
Advertisement
Comments
jestrfyl
May 20, 2009 10:36 AM

That's not Jesus! It look more like one of the Magi or maybe Martha setting the table ("Ooh Where is that Mery now? She is always findig some reason to slack off. Wait until I tell Jesus!")

Not every Cheeto is divine, some are just minor players int he snack bowl of life.

Cindy
May 20, 2009 4:10 PM

Too cheesy for words.

:)

alforo
May 20, 2009 5:00 PM

In the entire history of the world there must have been 35 trillion knotholes that look like Harpo Marx and 78 quintillion chunks of coal that look like Warren Harding and 894 billion gold nuggets that look like King kong and maybe 8,90,465 burned tortillas that looked like Dun Scotus. So whats your point. That there a visual similarities among things? So what?

ann
May 21, 2009 8:03 AM

Manna from heaven, cheetos from frito lay, it really is all the same...

scott powell
May 22, 2009 3:48 PM

will this go on e-bay or not, thanks scott,

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About Pontifications

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Catholicism in our Catholic forums.

David Gibson is an award-winning religion writer who specializes in writing about the Catholic Church, which he joined as a convert at the age of 30. He is the author The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. He also wrote The Coming Catholic Church: How the Faithful are Shaping a New American Catholicism. He has written about Catholicism for leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, New York magazine, Boston magazine, Fortune, Commonweal, and America. Gibson worked in Rome for Vatican Radio for several years and traveled frequently with Pope John Paul II. He later covered religion for The Star-Ledger of New Jersey. He has co-written several recent documentaries on Christianity for CNN. For further information check out his website at dgibson.com.

Search This Blog

David's Books:

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_coming.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.