And that was back in 1973! Another fascinating bit of transcription from recently-released tapes of conversations between Nixon and Billy Graham, this time focusing on Nixon's take on Catholics of the day. At America magazine's blog, Jim Martin has the goods. The set-up is Graham and Nixon discussing prospects for a worldwide church body to counter the left World Council of Churches. The two men see leading bishops in the GOP camp, and the Jesuits as "all-out, barn-burning radicals." Plus ca change!
President Nixon: Now what about the Catholics?
Rev. Graham: We don't know. They're going to come in great numbers as observers.
Nixon: Yeah.
Graham: So far, they would not be able to participate, and uh, you know the Southern Baptist and other groups wouldn't um...
Nixon: Yeah...the trouble is...
Graham: They couldn't anyway.
Nixon: Yeah. The difficulty too is that the Catholics aren't [in better shape] with that too. They're going be losing their stroke, because...
Graham: They're...they're...that is the problem.
Nixon: They're split right down the middle. They sure are. You've got the good guys like [John Cardinal] Krol of Philadelphia, and [Terence Cardinal] Cooke in New York. And then there's this bad wing, the Jesuits, who used to be the conservatives, and have become now become the all-out, barn-burning radicals.
Graham: I think quite a bit, by the way, of that fellow you've got working with you--McLaughlin.
Nixon: Oh yeah [laughter] the priest, yeah. You know, he's good, and he's sort of a convert to our side. He came in a total, all-out peacenik and then went to Vietnam and changed his mind.
Graham: I never met him, until I was over at a prayer breakfast over at the White House about a month ago. He invited me up to his office, and I went over and spent about an hour with him.
Nixon: He's a very capable fellow, bright as a tack.
Yes, that would be John McLaughlin, a former Jesuit priest who, unlike the liberal Robert Drinan, defied his superiors and left the order to become a conservative commentator and political insider.
Here is a link to Tape 43, Conversation 161.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
So, let me understand this...the Jesuits are a bunch of Pinko's? I did not see that coming.
Perhaps the Jesuits predominately in those days were taking Pinko on a global scale, kind of like a caliphate in Islam.
In all fairness the Pope's prayer intentions last month did include (as I remember) relief for the crippling debt of developing third world countries; yet it does fall short of liberation theology.
Which is worse in your opinion, David: defying your superiors or defying your Pope when your superiors are in conflict with him? Personally, I prefer not to defy the vicar of Christ, though I don't plan on joining the Jesuits any time soon.
PS Happy Feast Day of St's Peter and Paul :-)
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.