Pontifications

Year of St. Paul ends with revelations...

Monday June 29, 2009

Saint Paul mosaic.jpgFirst, Benedict XVI confirms that tests done on bone fragments from a tomb venerated as that of the Apostle--but often considered more legend than fact--belonged to a man who lived between the first and second century.

"This seems to confirm the unanimous and uncontested tradition that they are the mortal remains of the Apostle Paul," the pope said during an evening prayer service June 28 at Rome's Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, according to the CNS report.

The basilica has long been held to be the burial site of St. Paul, but because of the destruction and rebuilding of the basilica, the exact location of the tomb was unknown for centuries. Vatican officials announced in December 2006 that several feet below the basilica's main altar and behind a smaller altar, they had found a roughly cut marble sarcophagus beneath an inscription that reads: "Paul Apostle Martyr."

Because part of the sarcophagus is buried beneath building material, Vatican officials determined they could not dig it out to open and examine the contents. Initially they tried to X-ray it to see what was inside, but the marble was too thick.

Pope Benedict said a "very tiny perforation" was drilled into the marble so that a small probe could be inserted in order to withdraw fragments of what was inside.In addition to traces of purple linen, a blue fabric with linen threads and grains of red incense, he said they found bone fragments.

The bone fragments "underwent a carbon-14 analysis carried out by experts who did not know their place of origin," the pope said, adding that the results "indicate they belong to a person who lived between the first and second century."

Just as remarkable is the news that Vatican archaeologists have found what is likely the oldest known portrait of St Paul--a fourth-century mosaic (shown above, from the London Times story) that shows the Apostle to the Gentiles much as he has been portrayed down through the centuries.

L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, which devoted two pages to the discovery, said that the oval portrait, dated to the 4th century, had been found in the catacombs of St Thecla, not far from the Basilica of St Paul's Outside the Walls, where the apostle is buried. The find was "an extraordinary event", said Monsignor Gianfranco Ravasi, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture.

Barbara Mazzei, a restorer, said that centuries of grime had been removed with a laser. Fabrizio Bisconti, Professor of Christian Iconography at Rome University and a member of the team that made the discovery, said that it appeared to have decorated the tomb of a nobleman or high church official.

 

Advertisement
Comments
Your Name
June 30, 2009 7:16 PM

JF I have to agree with your comments. I am not Roman Catholic, but let's set the record straight. The Vatican exists today in part because of the conversion of Constantine and the making of Christianinty to be the legitimate religion in Rome. (Sorry Pagansister, but the pagans lost out at this time and I am sure you good folks were not treated well). However, the fact remains that there was a concerted effort on the part of Constantine and his Queen (wife), to find legitimate holy sites and artifacts to substantiate the claims of this new religion. It is reasonable to believe that the early christians who were being persecuted knew the site where Paul was buried after he was executed and would have passed that knowledge on to others. Later, when Constantine came on to the scene, the church would have built it's dedication and removed the bones from the gravesite and placed them in a sarcophagus. At this point in time, the church had no reason to hide or give out misinformation, and it always amazes me that people start from the position that anytime the RCC opens it's mouth, they must be lying! No, it is the other way around people! There were and are many good priests and nuns who were devoted to protecting what was true and not interested in perjuring themselves before God at this early a date in the history of Christianity.

Frank Clyburn
June 30, 2009 7:30 PM

I think the find is wonderful and I have no reason to doubt it. If it wasn't for St. Paul, many would not have been saved through Christ. Wonderful news!!

pagansister
July 1, 2009 2:59 PM

I agree, Dave Miller. There is no proof that JC did marry and have kids. However to me there really is no proof that he did what the Bible claims either. It was written to promote Christianity, and after 2000 years the stories are even less accurate than they were originally. They were written many, many years after JC was supposed to have been hung up. (oh, and brought back to life).

Yes, Your Name, Pagans were not treated well, however as one can see, not extinct.

A
July 1, 2009 9:43 PM

Dear Pagansister,
Seriously, I am curious as to why you invest so much time and creative energy to this blog when you think that the Christian faith and specifically the RC religion is just nonsense...
I hope that you find what you are searching for.
Respectfully,
A
BTW, You don't have to like or agree with the pope... but when you consistantly refer to him as "Benny" ... it lowers the conversation level.

pagansister
July 3, 2009 8:06 PM

"A":
Seriously, why shouldn't I write on this blog? And I found what I was looking for a long time ago. Thanks for the concern.

Benny hasn't, IMO earned the title given him by whoever does those things.(college of Cardinals?). thus "Benny". Calling him Pope requires respect for him. He and our fortunately former President, "W" are/were on the same level. Respect for the position of Pope (sometimes) and always respect for the office of President, but in both cases,not for the person in that position.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About Pontifications

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Catholicism in our Catholic forums.

David Gibson is an award-winning religion writer who specializes in writing about the Catholic Church, which he joined as a convert at the age of 30. He is the author The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. He also wrote The Coming Catholic Church: How the Faithful are Shaping a New American Catholicism. He has written about Catholicism for leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, New York magazine, Boston magazine, Fortune, Commonweal, and America. Gibson worked in Rome for Vatican Radio for several years and traveled frequently with Pope John Paul II. He later covered religion for The Star-Ledger of New Jersey. He has co-written several recent documentaries on Christianity for CNN. For further information check out his website at dgibson.com.

Search This Blog

David's Books:

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_coming.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.