Pontifications

Pontifications

Bernardin and Obama and “Common Ground” (UPDATE)

posted by David Gibson | 11:48am Thursday July 2, 2009

Obama and Catholic Journos.jpgThe current president has cited the late cardinal before, most recently in his speech at Notre Dame: ”He was a kind and good and wise man,” Barack Obama said then of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. “A saintly man.”

And the “Common Ground” approach of Chicago’s Bernardin and Chicago’s Obama have great resonances.

At a meeting this morning with [mainly] Catholic journalists ahead of his meeting next week with Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican, Obama invoked Bernardin again–and, as the WaPost’s Jackie Salmon writes, he “promised a ‘robust’ federal policy protecting health-care workers who have moral objections to performing some procedures.” (I think that’s the sound of another anti-Obama talking point falling.)

Tim Drake at the National Catholic Register (the other NCR was also there, represented by editor Joe Feuerherd) has a write-up based on a conversation with his publisher, Father Owen Kearns, who attended:

“The most noteworthy thing during the meeting was his dispelling of what you might call the expectation of the worst regarding conscience clauses,” said Father Kearns. “He said that the confusion regarding the issue was due to the timing of everything rather than what he was going to do. His administration saw the previous administration’s 11th-hour change as problematic, and so they undid that. He said that in Illinois he was a supporter of a robust conscience clause, something he reiterated in his Notre Dame speech. He added that the government has received hundreds of thousands of public comments and he promised that there would be a robust conscious clause protection in place, and that it would not be weaker than President Bush’s 11th hour change. Still, he added, it won’t please everybody.”

In addition, Father Kearns noted the president’s analysis of the divide in Catholicism.

“The president said he had fond memories of Cardinal Bernardin and that when he started his neighborhood project, they were funded by the Catholic Campaign for Human Development,” he said. “After the first question, from the National Catholic Reporter‘s Joe Feuerherd, the president jokingly asked, ‘Was there really [a controversy at Notre Dame]?’”

“The president spoke about how during Cardinal Bernardin’s time the U.S. bishops spoke about the nuclear freeze, the sanctuary movement, immigration, and the poor, but that later a decided change took place,” added Father Kearns. “He said that the responses to his administration mirror the tensions in the Church overall, but that Cardinal Bernardin was pro-life and never hesitated to make his views known, but he had a consistent ‘seamless garment’ approach that emphasized the other issues as well. The president said that that part of the Catholic tradition continues to inspire him. Those issues, he said, seemed to have gotten buried by the abortion debate.”

Joe Feuerherd also has these bits just in:

Asked whether he sometimes felt he has been “dragged into a largely intra-Catholic family fight” on issues that divide liberal and conservative Catholics, Obama again recalled Bernardin’s example, particularly as it relates to the “seamless garment” of life issues the late cardinal saw as integral to Catholic teaching.

“Cardinal Bernardin was strongly pro-life, never shrank away from talking about that issue, but was very consistent in talking about a seamless garment and a range of issues that were part and parcel of what he considered to be pro-life, that meant that he was concerned about poverty, he was concerned about how children were treated, he was concerned about the death penalty, he was concerned about foreign policy.

“And that part of the Catholic tradition is something that continues to inspire me. And I think that there have been times over the last decade or two where that more holistic tradition feels like it’s gotten buried under the abortion debate.”

The president continued, “Now, as a non-Catholic, it’s not up to me to try to resolve those tensions. As I said, all I can do is to affirm how that other tradition has made me, a non-Catholic, I think reflect on how I can be a better person and has had a powerful influence on my life. And that tells me that it might be a powerful way to move a broader set of values forward in American life generally.”

Pat Zapor at CNS was also there and reports in:

Obama said his encounters with the cardinal continue to influence him, particularly his “seamless garment” approach to a multitude of social justice issues. He also told the group of eight reporters to expect a conscience clause protection for health care workers currently under review by the administration that will be no less protective than what existed previously.

In addition to Catholic News Service, the round table included reporters and editors from other Catholic publications: National Catholic Reporter, America magazine, Catholic Digest, National Catholic Register, Commonweal magazine and Vatican Radio. The religion writer from The Washington Post also participated.

SNIP

Obama said in some ways he sees his first meeting with the pope as the same as any contact with a head of state, “but obviously this is more than just that. The Catholic Church has such a profound influence worldwide and in our country, and the Holy Father is a thought leader and opinion leader on so many wide-ranging issues. His religious influence is one that extends beyond the Catholic Church.”

He said he considers it a great honor to be meeting with the pope and that he hopes the session will lead to further cooperation between the Vatican and the United States in addressing Middle East peace, worldwide poverty, climate change, immigration and a whole host of other issues.

Several of the questions addressed the sometimes contentious relations between the Obama administration and some U.S. bishops, notably surrounding the president’s commencement address at the University of Notre Dame in May. The university’s decision to invite Obama and present him with an honorary degree led to a wave of protests at the university and a flurry of criticism by more than 70 bishops who said his support for legal abortion made him an inappropriate choice by the university.

Statements by the U.S. bishops also have chastised Obama for administrative actions such as the reversal of the Mexico City policy, which had prohibited the use of federal family planning funds by organizations that provide abortions or counsel women to have abortions.

But Obama said he’s not going to be deterred from continuing to work with the U.S. Catholic hierarchy, in part “because I’m president of all Americans, not just Americans who happen to agree with me.”

“The American bishops have profound influence in their communities, in the church and beyond,” Obama said. “What I would say is that although there have been criticisms leveled at me from some of the bishops, there have been a number of bishops who have been extremely generous and supportive even if they don’t agree with me on every issue.”

He said part of why he wants to establish a good working relationship with the bishops is because he has fond memories of working with Cardinal Bernardin when Obama was a community organizer, working with Catholic parishes on the South Side of Chicago.

“And so I know the potential that the bishops have to speak out forcefully on issues of social justice,” Obama said.

It’s interesting that if Bernardin was something of a prophet without honor in his own country–his common ground initiative met sharp resistance from his fellow cardinals–his ideas and spirit live on elsewhere. Salt of the earth, as Joseph Ratzinger (and someone before him) once put it.  

Will Obama’s Bernardinesque approach work for America, or American Catholics?

(Above is White House photo via NCRegister)



Previous Posts

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »

Signs of the times: Obama's eye
Yes, this photo of Obama ostensibly eyeing a young woman (apparently a 17-year-old delegate from Brazil--where are her parents?!) at the G-8 Summit is the hottest Google search item. And of course the question of what Obama was thinking is a leading Fox News story. So it goes, even as the

posted 12:26:05pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
ed

posted July 2, 2009 at 2:06 pm


And let us all remember it was Cardinal”cover-up’ Law the un-official US primate who led the charge on Cardinal Bernardin..



report abuse
 

David - midwest

posted July 2, 2009 at 4:02 pm


Ed – (& David?)
Check out Carol Marin’s recent column for further background on this ‘question’. It’s titled:
Let Bernardin’s spirit guide Obama, pope
at http://www.suntimes.com
(url: http://www.suntimes.com/news/marin/1642023,CST-EDT-carol28.article)
Be aware that the charge that Stephen Cook never really recanted still surfaces here in the midwest ‘catholic’ blogosphere. The complicated tensions in that charge lie just below the surface – and pop up whenever an effort is made to talk common ground.



report abuse
 

C3

posted July 2, 2009 at 4:16 pm


It seems Common Ground is code for slight of hand. While being all for finding shared goals and beliefs it shouldn’t be to the exclusion of addressing issues and finding compromise on things that each side oppose.
I wonder how many miles of this “Common Ground” will be placed in between the Pope and Obama in light of our President’s easing of restrictions making it possible for federal tax dollars to go toward abortions?
Now as I’ve stated here in the past, personally I’m opposed to abortion but I do believe in a secular society that the legality should be decided on a county by county basis. Making federal taxes available means simply by paying these taxes I’m financially supporting a procedure I am vehemently opposed to.
Is this what Obama’s idea of Common Ground is?
And sing all the praises of Bernadin now, but I don’t remember so much as a single note being played for the man back in the day by the press. It seems the Press of today holds common ground with the Press of the past. Hypocrisy



report abuse
 

JF

posted July 3, 2009 at 9:43 am


You know, before we allow people to take on the mantle of Cardingal Bernardin, let’s look at what he had to say about his “seamless garment” approach. He doesn’t even think that those who subscribe to the philosophy can vote for a pro-choice politician:
“I don’t see how you can subscribe to the consistent ethic and then vote for someone who feels that abortion is a ‘basic right’ of the individual.” He went on to say, “I know that some people on the left, if I may use that label, have used the consistent ethic to give the impression that the abortion issue is not all that important anymore, that you should be against abortion in a general way but that there are more important issues, so don’t hold anybody’s feet to the fire just on abortion. That’s a misuse of the consistent ethic, and I deplore it.”
Bernardin’s seamless garment, or “constant ethic” approach that President Obama is now touting as his guide is a useful tool for us to keep in mind that there are many issues that require our attention. However, when the unborn are being killed en masse, that is an overriding problem. It seems Cardinal Bernardin would agree.



report abuse
 

RJohnson

posted July 3, 2009 at 5:03 pm


C3: “Making federal taxes available means simply by paying these taxes I’m financially supporting a procedure I am vehemently opposed to.”
Welcome to the United States, C3. Where have you been? Many of us have been paying taxes for programs that we vehemently oppose for years (Iraq war, subsidies to profitable corporations, the list is endless). When we raise an objection to it we are told to either leave or shut up by the guardians of liberty, the Christian Republican party.



report abuse
 

JF

posted July 4, 2009 at 8:28 am


Of those things paid for by the government, only one amounts to the termination of the lives of the most vulnerable members of society. And, just because some objectionable things are paid for by the government, it is not justifiable to then open the flood gates for all manner of immoral funding.



report abuse
 

C3

posted July 5, 2009 at 3:52 pm


RJ,
Thank you for the most priggish of salutations. No kidding, we pay for things we are opposed to? I suppose the proper thing is to shut up when told and keep paying, right? Not by any means create a scuff, we wouldn’t want to leave the comforts of our recently devalued homes and I don’t know, maybe, uh, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?!?!
I don’t know where you’re from but where I come from if you get told to shut up and like it, you raise the rhetoric, volume, and get right up close and personal to make sure that everyone knows exactly who you are talking to.
The hopeless feeling of defeat and consequential concessions you are encouraging is the exact reason we are in this mess in the first place.
Last I checked it was the secular Democratic party that is hitting the mute button on this but I’ll give you credit for one helluva good attempt at the old slight of hand, demonizing one group of people when it is the other that is doing the shhh’ing…



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted July 7, 2009 at 9:05 am


What I want to know is how do you part out the Catholic faith? It sounds like Obama feels that the abortion issue gets in the way of the “real issues”. Unfortunately for him, the sanctity of life which includes abortion, is an integral teaching of the Catholic and many evangelical churches. Funny how people always want to throw out those integral, foundational teachings in the name of “common ground”.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.