Progressive Revival

Common Good Revival

Tuesday July 29, 2008

There is a new faith movement afoot in the public square, and this new blog is certainly one indicator.  This movement seeks wisdom from the idea of the common good - central to in my Catholic tradition, and many...
Advertisement
Comments
Paul Shiras, Evangelical Wholeness
July 30, 2008 12:33 AM

Considering that both candidates may have Roman Catholic running mates, it looks as if Common Good may be on the agenda this time around.

It sure has been a fact that the Religious Right have no compassion for anybody except themselves. I am looking forward to a Catholic V.P. and the return to the Social Gospel of the sixties.

I also welcome this blog site and have added it to my daily readings. To be Whole in Christ is to live Holy and Blameless in Christ. To live HOly in Christ is to keep both Great Commandments in your heart at all times.

recovering ex-Pentecostal
July 30, 2008 2:04 PM

Could someone explain how "a historic gathering of Catholics" is supposed to be representative of "the 'new' rising religious left"?

Mel
July 30, 2008 5:12 PM

The Convention for the Common Good represents the past ... not the future for the politically-motivated religiously-active in this country.

Not to rain on your parade, Alexia, but I'll guess you were among the youngest persons among the throng of grayhairs.

Here's a report on the Convention by Deal Hudson. It was posted 7/15/08 and can be found at insidecatholic.com:

"The audience of about 700 was largely older. Almost everyone was over 60; out of 700 only about 30 were any younger. When one of the organizers was asked about the lack of young adults, the reply was: 'It's quality, not quantity.

"Another organizer said that most of the participants were nuns, recruited for the conference by Network -- they were referred to as the 'low-hanging fruit.' In looking over the registration list, 25% or more of the attendees were sisters. If many of the older women there were religious, you would not have known it by their dress."

Alexia, is this best you can offer us on this blog?

Aaron
July 30, 2008 10:22 PM

Compare this crowd of leftovers to an FSSP Chartres pilgrimage or an Opus Dei conference. A gaggle of be-sandaled sisters born during the Coolidge administration vs. teeming hordes of young men and women who can chant the Gloria in Latin. The revolution is over Alexia. Young Catholics want Truth, not the DNC platform.

Alexia Kelley
July 31, 2008 7:39 AM

Mel and Aaron, I'm happy to dialogue about the Catholic social tradition, the common good here on this blog. You seem to want to focus on appearances, ages (tho I appreciate your making me young in the range there) and associating Catholic social doctrine with “the revolution." Not sure what revolution you are talking aboNut however. Let’s talk substance! What do you think about Catholic social doctrine? How about the principle of the common good consistent throughout the encyclicals?

However, on the Deal account you actually posted above, I’m saddened to have Deal’s blog referenced here on these pages and I have to address it. I’m surprised Mel that you’d take Deal Hudson’s account of the Convention for the Common Good seriously. He did not attend. He is not a credible voice on issues of public or personal morality. (If he was a priest, he would have been removed from ministry) . And, his blog contains repeated factual errors, including the account of the Convention.

To those who attended the Convention and for actual reporters who were there, it was clear that there were plenty of young people, middle-age people, folks of all ages present. Sadly or not for me, I was far from the youngest there. There was an excellent, substantive and free children's program with full child care, for kids of all ages who came with their parents. The children gave a moving presentation to the entire plenary at the closing ceremony.

But clearly Deal Hudson’s representative missed the children’s program and presentation. It seems they were too busy noticing the terrible news: the presence of so many nuns! I'm flabbergasted that anyone would seek to make a strength of any gathering, and a historical and current strength of our Church –women religious- into a weakness. Turning the tables and a strength into a weakness: a familiar tactic from the Karl Rove campaign playbook, but certainly not a Catholic move.

Mel
July 31, 2008 9:36 AM

Alexia Kelley: "Let’s talk substance! What do you think about Catholic social doctrine? How about the principle of the common good consistent throughout the encyclicals?"

Oh, sure, let's talk substance, all right. Unfortunately, you did very little of that with your post at 7:39 AM.

You devoted a good portion of that to ridiculing the personal life of Deal Hudson. Then you brought up Karl Rove (was he at this convention?) and made some snarky comment about Mr. Rove's "campaign playbook."

I am tempted to answer your thoughtful question and review some of the pertinent encyclicals (e.g., Rerum Novarum and Centessimus Annus) but I'm turned off by the tone of your 7:39 AM post. Is partisan rancor and the "politics of personal destruction" part of your understanding of Catholic social doctrine? One would think so judging by your post.

James
July 31, 2008 9:46 AM

I was at the convention and was encouraged by all the enthusiasm. I'm discouraged by those who want to tear down rather than build up. Wouldn't it be nice if there was more mutual respect in this world?

Mel
July 31, 2008 11:34 AM

Alexia, I'm puzzled as to why you're dissing Deal Hudson.

If he's as bad as you say he is, then why was he "warmly" invited to attend the Convention which you organized?.

The invitation was publicly extended back in April by Marie Dennis of the Maryknoll Office of Global Concerns.

Ms. Dennis wrote: "Along with Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and NETWORK (A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby), Maryknoll warmly invites Mr. Deal Hudson to attend the Convention for the Common Good in Philadelphia, July 11-13, and join hundreds of Catholics as we discuss pressing moral and political issues facing our nation."

This was all over the Catholic blogosphere. For example, you can see the story at Catholic Online, dated April 10, at this link: http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=27526

Mr. Hudson was unable to attend your Convention. Is it out of anger at Hudson's absence that you're so quick to dig up embarrassing personal details about the man. How is the "Common Good" which you talk about advanced by that tactic?

Aaron
July 31, 2008 7:30 PM

When it comes to "social tradition," the only substance I am interested in is the Magesterium of the Catholic Church. Abortion, contraception and the homosexual act are grave, mortal sins . . . objectively. The saints, the Popes, and Christ Himself make this clear. See e.g. the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I take it you disagree. I'm not sure what there is to discuss. You are a Catholic. Be a Catholic. Love the Holy Father. Live the living traditions of the Church. Obey the living Word of God as it is proclaimed by Mother Church.

James
August 1, 2008 10:38 AM

McCain resists calls to remove embattled Catholic aide
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2008/07/31/20080731mccaincatholics0731.html

For weeks, Sen. John McCain's campaign has quietly resisted calls to dump one of his leading religious representatives who critics say is an inappropriate surrogate because of links to allegations of sexual impropriety.

At least three religious groups have asked the McCain campaign to remove Deal W. Hudson from its national Catholic-outreach group. The groups say Hudson, who quit President Bush's political team in 2004 amid similar calls, lacks the moral authority to represent the campaign on religious issues.

Hudson left a tenured professorship at Fordham University in New York after a 1994 incident in which he was accused of having sex with a freshman. He was never charged with a crime.

The controversy could hamper McCain's efforts to win over religious voters, who are wary of his candidacy.

The campaign declined to discuss the matter Wednesday and repeated an earlier statement.

"He's a name on a list, a volunteer. When are we going to start talking about gas prices, jobs and the issues facing Americans? The McCain campaign is all done with the 'gotcha' games," said Tucker Bounds, a McCain spokesman.

But those who are troubled by Hudson's background say he is more than a volunteer. Earlier this month, he was identified on a Catholic radio show as a McCain surrogate, and he also hosted a conference call with the deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee discussing the campaign with Catholic media.

"He just shouldn't be representing Catholics for the campaign. It's offensive," said a member of McCain's steering committee who did not want his name used. Catholics "reject him as a moral arbiter."

For McCain, it is the second time his supporters have upset at least some Catholics, a key voting group. In May, McCain rejected the support of the Rev. John Hagee, a Texas-based tel- evangelist who has made several anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish comments.

Hudson, a self-styled "theocon" who now lives in Fairfax, Va., left Fordham after one of his former students sued him, claiming he plied her with drinks and had sex with her when she was 18 years old. The case was later settled.

Hudson, who was a philosophy professor, declined to comment through a spokesman. In an earlier statement, Hudson said: "My past continues to be a source of shame to me and, unfortunately, my family. I'm not blaming anyone for this. It was my own fault. And while the revelation of my failing was deeply humiliating, it was also an important wake-up call for me. Over the past four years, I've tried to make amends with family, friends and supporters."

In 2000, Hudson served as a leading figure for Bush's efforts in courting Catholic voters. In August 2004, he quit Bush's re-election campaign after the National Catholic Reporter outlined the Fordham incident.

In March, Hudson found a home with the McCain campaign, when he was among a list of about 100 "prominent Catholics" supporting the presumptive Republican nominee.

Hudson is director of Inside Catholic.com, a Web site for faith, culture and politics. He has used that outlet to praise McCain for his opposition to abortion rights and gay marriage and attack Sen. Barack Obama for his support of abortion rights.

"There is no doubt that the dramatic progress made in reducing abortions over the last 30 years - now at their lowest number since 1974 - will be rapidly reversed under a President Obama," Hudson wrote this month. This week, he described Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine, who is widely regarded as a potential Obama running mate, as a "pro-abortion Catholic."

Kaine, who is Catholic and spent a year in a Jesuit mission, has said he is personally opposed to abortion but would not restrict a woman's reproductive rights.

Religion has been a recurring issue in this year's presidential election for other candidates, as well.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, faced questions during his run for the Republican nomination about the role his faith would play. So, too, did former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who tried to allay concerns about his Mormon faith during his bid.

For more than a month, Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, faced heavy criticism for his initial unwillingness to distance himself from his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., who made remarks seen as racially divisive from his Chicago pulpit. In April, Obama created another stir when he said small-town Americans cling to guns and religion out of bitterness in a deteriorating economy.

And throughout the campaign, Obama has faced untrue suggestions that he is a Muslim.

The same day McCain rejected Hagee, he also rejected the support of the Rev. Rod Parsley, an Ohio preacher who gave an anti-Muslim sermon.

James
August 1, 2008 10:41 AM

McCain resists calls to remove embattled Catholic aide

For weeks, Sen. John McCain's campaign has quietly resisted calls to dump one of his leading religious representatives who critics say is an inappropriate surrogate because of links to allegations of sexual impropriety.

At least three religious groups have asked the McCain campaign to remove Deal W. Hudson from its national Catholic-outreach group. The groups say Hudson, who quit President Bush's political team in 2004 amid similar calls, lacks the moral authority to represent the campaign on religious issues.

Hudson left a tenured professorship at Fordham University in New York after a 1994 incident in which he was accused of having sex with a freshman. He was never charged with a crime.

The controversy could hamper McCain's efforts to win over religious voters, who are wary of his candidacy.

The campaign declined to discuss the matter Wednesday and repeated an earlier statement.

"He's a name on a list, a volunteer. When are we going to start talking about gas prices, jobs and the issues facing Americans? The McCain campaign is all done with the 'gotcha' games," said Tucker Bounds, a McCain spokesman.

But those who are troubled by Hudson's background say he is more than a volunteer. Earlier this month, he was identified on a Catholic radio show as a McCain surrogate, and he also hosted a conference call with the deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee discussing the campaign with Catholic media.

"He just shouldn't be representing Catholics for the campaign. It's offensive," said a member of McCain's steering committee who did not want his name used. Catholics "reject him as a moral arbiter."

For McCain, it is the second time his supporters have upset at least some Catholics, a key voting group. In May, McCain rejected the support of the Rev. John Hagee, a Texas-based tel- evangelist who has made several anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish comments.

Hudson, a self-styled "theocon" who now lives in Fairfax, Va., left Fordham after one of his former students sued him, claiming he plied her with drinks and had sex with her when she was 18 years old. The case was later settled.

Hudson, who was a philosophy professor, declined to comment through a spokesman. In an earlier statement, Hudson said: "My past continues to be a source of shame to me and, unfortunately, my family. I'm not blaming anyone for this. It was my own fault. And while the revelation of my failing was deeply humiliating, it was also an important wake-up call for me. Over the past four years, I've tried to make amends with family, friends and supporters."

In 2000, Hudson served as a leading figure for Bush's efforts in courting Catholic voters. In August 2004, he quit Bush's re-election campaign after the National Catholic Reporter outlined the Fordham incident.

In March, Hudson found a home with the McCain campaign, when he was among a list of about 100 "prominent Catholics" supporting the presumptive Republican nominee.

Hudson is director of Inside Catholic.com, a Web site for faith, culture and politics. He has used that outlet to praise McCain for his opposition to abortion rights and gay marriage and attack Sen. Barack Obama for his support of abortion rights.

"There is no doubt that the dramatic progress made in reducing abortions over the last 30 years - now at their lowest number since 1974 - will be rapidly reversed under a President Obama," Hudson wrote this month. This week, he described Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine, who is widely regarded as a potential Obama running mate, as a "pro-abortion Catholic."

Kaine, who is Catholic and spent a year in a Jesuit mission, has said he is personally opposed to abortion but would not restrict a woman's reproductive rights.

Religion has been a recurring issue in this year's presidential election for other candidates, as well.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, faced questions during his run for the Republican nomination about the role his faith would play. So, too, did former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who tried to allay concerns about his Mormon faith during his bid.

For more than a month, Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, faced heavy criticism for his initial unwillingness to distance himself from his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., who made remarks seen as racially divisive from his Chicago pulpit. In April, Obama created another stir when he said small-town Americans cling to guns and religion out of bitterness in a deteriorating economy.

And throughout the campaign, Obama has faced untrue suggestions that he is a Muslim.

The same day McCain rejected Hagee, he also rejected the support of the Rev. Rod Parsley, an Ohio preacher who gave an anti-Muslim sermon.

Joe
August 1, 2008 10:54 AM

I was at the convention. It was neither liberal nor conservative; neither democrat nor republican. It was Catholic. Those who try to dismiss this historic gathering as anything else are attempting to divide Catholicism along party lines, and are doing a grave disservice to American Catholics.

The convention directly tackled issues such as immigration, war, the economy, the environment, and health care – and building a consistent culture of life. By no means are these the only issues with which we dealt, but I’m sure these the ones to which you are referring when you infer that the platform that of the DNC. (All three politicians who attended and spoke were pro-life and talked about building up a consistent culture of life). I have read a number of response posts, both on this blog and Deal Hudson’s blog, which label the convention as the ‘Catholic left.’ I have posted on Hudson’s blog, as well. The issues I have listed, the issues which make up the common good platform, are the issues of the Magisterium.

Health Care: The Catechism says that “Concern for the health of its citizens requires that society help in the attainment of living-conditions that allow them to grow and reach maturity: food and clothing, housing, health care, basic education, employment, and social assistance” (2288).

Immigration: Pope Benedict XVI, when speaking on immigration from Latin America during his visit to the United States, said, “Above all the United States must help countries develop themselves. Doing so is in the interests of everyone, not just this country but the whole world, including the United States. In the short term, it’s very important above all to help the families. This is the primary objective, to ensure that families are protected, not destroyed.”

War and Peace: “In this age which boasts of its atomic power, it no longer makes sense to maintain that war is a fit instrument with which to repair the violation of justice” (Pope John XXIII, Pacem in Terris, 127).

Environment: "The wonder of God's creation reminds us of the need to protect the environment and to exercise responsible stewardship of the goods of the earth” (Pope Benedict XVI’s opening address to this year’s World Youth Day).

Economy: “All forms of economic enterprise must be governed by the principles of social justice and charity” (Pope John XXIII, Mater et Magistra).

What makes everyone want to divide our church by dismissing this convention as liberal propaganda? What is there on the platform that would be condemned by the Catholic Magisterium? Why come on this blog simply to bash the convention and, worse, to bash Ms. Kelley? The convention attempted, and I dare to say succeeded, to promote the fullness of the Catholic faith within the American political life.

Chris
August 1, 2008 1:25 PM

I also attended the convention, and can state without reservation that Deal Hudson's second-hand report was way off base. Plenty of young adults were there - myself included. Contrary to his claims that no "conservative" groups were represented, the Pro-Life Union of Southeastern Pennsylvania staffed a table all weekend and handed out stickers and literature. Furthermore, his account of the partial birth abortion discussion is a woeful misrepresentation of the facts. No public policy amendments of any kind were accepted, in favor of ratifying the values principles contained in the Platform for the Common Good.

I'm also mystified as to why Mr. Hudson would attack the convention over a report that "many [of its speakers] didn't think a Just War was even possible." This same sentiment was echoed by Cardinal Ratzinger in 2003:

"There were not sufficient reasons to unleash a war against Iraq. To say nothing of the fact that, given the new weapons that make possible destructions that go beyond the combatant groups, today we should be asking ourselves if it is still licit to admit the very existence of a 'just war'."

It often seems that Deal Hudson thinks of himself as more Catholic than the pope! Perhaps this is why Deal attacked our Holy Father last year for initiating a Vatican campaign against climate change.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.