Progressive Revival

The System

Saturday July 26, 2008

There are clearly major problems to be considered at this time in US electoral history. the economy, foreign policy, and the blurring of lines between combatants and non-combatants, for instance. But it's just possible that there are obstacles in the system itself that make those issues difficult to deal with.

For instance: When did party politics begin to supercede personal conscience? In this particular electoral season, for instance, the cry of the parties was for 'party unity' long before the voters had registered their final choices in either party. The Democrats began to din 'superdelegates' in March to fall in line behind one candidate despite the fact that there were weeks, even months, to go before the convention that is meant to choose candidates.  

Question: What happens to a democracy in which "the party line" supercedes personal conscience? Are we electing the party or the person who, we can now guarantee will vote with the party at all times. Have we built gridlock into the system?

And while we're talking about conscience: What happens to other voices in the country as an increasingly stronger two-party system crowds them out of the electoral arena. In some countries proportional voting brings all the voices to the table at once. If the Greens get three percent of the popular vote, they get three percent of the seats at issue. But where in our system do other voices go? And is that slowing this country's consciousness of emerging issues like greening, trafficking and immigration. Among others.  

Maybe we should be discussing  political issues like these before democracy becomes more a rallying cry in the American imagination than the real thing and personal conscience becomes a thing of the past. 


Advertisement
Comments
Citizen of the Cosmos
July 28, 2008 5:49 PM

Sister,

The reason superdelegates were being pushed to fall in line is that by then, Obama had mathematically guaranteed that he would have a majority of the delegates at issue, and it was also mathematically guaranteed that neither candidate would have enough pledged delegates to gain the nomination. If the superdelegates had held out until the convention, that would have been an expression of political cowardice, not conscience.

Third parties become more popular when the line between the two major parties blurs. Such a blurring takes place when individuals in a party are all over the map, rather than "voting the party line". When you have two parties that draw clear contrasts, two large coalitions is apparently good enough.

What we should really be having a national conversation about is why Democrats were too weak or frightened to impeach Bush and Cheney, or doing anything beyond issuing impotent subpoenas in response to the large number of crimes committed by this administration and a popular outcry for upholding the constitution, why Republicans have been willing to go down with Mr. 28%'s ship, why the media has been such an enabling machine for Republican and corporate interests (but I repeat myself).

Ask those questions, and we'll find the real weaknesses in our system of government.

Noodle Beach
July 28, 2008 9:38 PM

Sister Joan makes an excellent point. John Adams knew that political parties would cause divisiveness and severe damage to the democracy. He wrote about this threat often. He believed it would lead to governing decisions good for the party but not for the country. Hillary said in her campaign it was time a Democrat won the White House. Why? Because a 3rd party candidate could not possibly be good for the country? Party first, country second. Not good.

PAUL SHIRAS
July 29, 2008 12:15 PM

While we have a ineffective two party system, there has not been a viable third party to arise. The reason for this is that the "others" who would like to to the leader of the band are to radical, unstable and just plain nuts. We will not ever have an effective third party until the moderates and progressives get together and decide that the Left/Right battle is passe'.

Meanwhile, we have to make our choices based on who we think is less a fool and will do the least harm. Last time we got it wrong, this time we may have better choices.

Mary A. O'Donnell
August 4, 2008 3:25 PM

Citizen of the Cosmos has this absolutely right and there isn't anything else to say, except, we had better all stay awake and alert. We need to pay attention and be loud in our response to our government, also our church, which has the opinion that most of us are very stupid.

sharon
August 4, 2008 5:17 PM

I applaud the thoughts and agree with sister. If we continue to focus on party politics then the issues which we seemingly voice a belief with our furvor are dealt with second class passion. Another way of dealing with the two party system would be to have a democrat as president, a republican as vice president and then after two years they would be required to switch roles. Now just think about the problem solving that would have to happen. Its like putting two enemies in the same room and shutting the door. The two entities would be forced to get along. What a concept. Maybe they actually would help America. Wow.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.