Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival

DNC’s platform and Abortion – A Pro-Choice point of View

posted by Kathleen Kennedy Townsend | 12:21pm Tuesday August 19, 2008

As a pro-choice Dem,  I am pleased by the DNC’s plank on abortion. It reaffirms Roe…AND it also show party’s  respect for pro-life Dems.  Most smartlly, it challenges the Republican party to connect its rhetoric to results.  For years, Rs have simply condemned Roe, criticized women, and curried favor with Catholic hierarchy…which is all male.  But they made little effort to actually support women in their choice to have a child. They did not commit to funding. Now, thanks to Doug Kmiec, Tony Campolo and others, our party has specifically acknowledged the need to make sure that pregnant women receive pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support and caring adoption programs.

 

The platform underscores the fact that a  woman’s  decision  to have a child is not make in isolation but is connected to questions about many aspects of her life.  By specifying that a women should have access to  services  during pregnancy and after, the language reflects a significant part of the Catholic moral tradition of the common good…and the truth that the relationship that we have with one another can help us make good choices. 

 

For years, Dems have pointed out that  Democratic party policies in fact help to reduce the number of abortions.  Abortions were reduced under Bill Clinton and rose under George Bush. This new language by explicitly  connecting the support  for women  to the issue of abortion helps to make show why that could be so. 



Previous Posts

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.&nb

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on websites either directly or more subtly (e.g., Sarah Palin

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like most other progressive activists, I understood that a pres

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Values or Partisanship? TV Ad calls out Graham for caving on climate
by Keely Brewster It was disappointing that Lindsey Graham changed his mind, values, and opinions surrounding climate legislation. Lindsey Graham was right when he discussed the need to decrease our dependence on foreign oil for reasons of national security, economic security, and job loss. Lindsey

posted 2:32:58pm Jun. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Rob

posted August 20, 2008 at 12:30 am


While I share and support your point of view, I think there’s probably a more winsome way to present it than “reducing the number of abortions.” Rigid anti-abortionists will not accept reduction of the number of abortions as an acceptable goal, while they are not likely to argue against supporting pregnant women and providing health care “for the unborn child.”



report abuse
 

Donna Schaper

posted August 20, 2008 at 7:24 am


Thank you Kathleen for articulating such a wise point of view on the “revived” conversation re abortion and the election. Evangelicals, like me, who are also progressives, like me, understand completely how a person can vote for a candidate who is pro choice. Our problem would be voting for someone who was against choice. Often such candidates limit the action of God in history, in such a way as to be nearly idolatrous.
Never place a period where God has put a comma, and that includes the interpretation of scripture, which doesn’t prohibit abortion in the first place. How the punishmentalists have managed to get away with rank distortion of scripture is beyond me. You’d think they never heard of the golden rule. The disrespect of scripture and the arrogance with which it is done — joined to the absence of compassion for women, with potentially accidental milk in their breasts — keeps me away from any candidate who doesn’t support the right to choose an abortion.
We need a Rick Warren for progressive, not closed, evangelicals.



report abuse
 

Reaganite in NYC

posted August 20, 2008 at 2:24 pm


Kathleen Kennedy Townsend writes: “Democratic party policies in fact help to reduce the number of abortions. Abortions were reduced under Bill Clinton and rose under George Bush.”
Sorry, but this is an urban myth based on flawed research. Kennedy is wrong. The whole notion has been debunked by Dr. Randall O’Bannon, director of research for National Right to Life. You can check out for yourself O’Bannon’s analysis of this lie here at: http://www.nrlc.org/news/2005/NRL02/AbortionIncreaseMyth.html
As the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan was fond of saying, you’re entitled to your opinion, but you’re not entitled to make up your own “facts.”



report abuse
 

Anne Danielson

posted September 2, 2008 at 8:24 pm


The Catholic Church is not nor will it ever be pro-choice. A pro-choice Catholic is an oxymoron.
“When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the infant leaped in her womb.”
Pray to Mary, she will show you the Truth.



report abuse
 

Roman Catholic

posted November 17, 2008 at 10:33 am


A pro-choice Catholic is an apostate.
Don’t be surprised by this woman’s individualistic views which very often are outside the teachings of the church. When she was young, when her mother didn’t like the homily, they were simply ushered out of the church by her. And they called themselves ‘good catholics.’
A good cafeteria catholic at best.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.