Jon Stewart on Sarah Palin: All you need to know!

Too bad I don't watch more of Jon Stewart - he's on too late for me. I really need to get that DVR!

Sooooooooooo funny.....

Dunno. John Edwards isn't running for anything this time around. So, not sure how that matters. Though I would say (adultery aside, but we really do NOT want to be bringing up marital matters, now do we?), John Edwards DOES have a legal career that spans back to 1981 (you do know he's older than he looks, right? The man was, even at the time of his Veep run, 51 years old. Some kinda 'Dorian Gray' deal, or Dick Clark genes. Dunno.

But, he owned his own law firm since 1993, also. In a town that, itself, has half the population of the entire state of Alaska.

Politically, 5 years in the Federal Senate (at the time of his veep candidacy in 2004). Sorry, no beauty pageants.

So, for a Veep, not the most unusual level of experience out there.

Not that he's running for VP this time around anyway, so not sure why anyone was asking.

And I will note, the 'experience' issue is less about Democrats asking, as much as a hypocrisy one. If I went around saying that a person needed to be tall to do a job, then I picked an assistant who was barely five feet tall, someone in the same job, even if they are shorter than that person, has the right to bring it up. Because I made such a big deal about it.

What kind of "Catholic journalist" are you, anyhow?

The other day you post a tasteless commentary about Gustav demonstrating a kind of karmic justice against the Republicans (thinking echoed by former Democratic Party Chairman Don Fowler as well as the notorious documentary film maker Michael Moore.) Boy, that certainly places you in great company.

Now you run this sexist diatribe by that smarmy smart-aleck on Comedy Central!

Perhaps your gig here on beliefnet is just an audition for getting a permanent assignment on The Daily Kos as their token "Catholic" commentator. That's obviously where you belong.

DCO: "I am tired of MSM deciding for me what I should see and not see."

Fine, but don't think you're going to get a contrarian or independent view from Jon Stewart and his "show" on Comedy Central. He's nothing more than the Court Jester for the MSM -- and merely validates what comes out of the MSM.

Of course, for the intellectually lazy who prefer the "conventional wisdom" to be spoonfed to them with heavy doses of yuck-yucks, Jon Stewart is obviously their guy.

As for the Governor of Montana, he looked like Michael Moore in a bolo tie sans glasses. Or, perhaps, an aging college cheerleader who's eaten a few too many buffalo burgers over the years. But, of course, I agree that he was indeed one of the highlights of the Dem. Nat'l Convention ... which tells you everything you need to know about the Denver gathering.

Emelie,
Those who look to Jon Stewart for their news are really no more "intellectually lazy" than Rush Limbaugh's "Dittoheads" who look to Rush for their news, and there are plenty of them (in spite of the fact that Rush himself tells them he's not a journalist).

And the "MSM" as you call it doesn't really report news anymore. The news media must now make money, unlike the days when the networks and affiliates lived with the fact that the news department lost money, because reporting news was considered a civic duty. Nowadays, we get Anna Nicole and Brittney and Caylee and God-knows-what-else that isn't really news.

I agree, though, with you calling Jon Stewart a court jester. That's a good thing, IMO because, going back to medieval times, the court jester was the only one in the court who was allowed to tell the king the unvarnished truth.