When the news of Darwish's passing came out, it was front-page news on Al-jazeera. The Telegraph covered his passing, as did admirers from Malaysia to Ramallah in Palestine. Meanwhile, American sites like CNN featured crucial news like the passing away of Bernie Mac and John Edwards' infidelity. Today, while Al-Jazeera continues to honor Mahmud Darwish with an extensive video tribute, CNN features on their front page: Family dog chases 200-lb bear up a tree. It is not just that the Palestinians' humanity takes a backseat to that of Israelis, it is also buried underneath "
Darwish, like all great postcolonials, spoke out against multiple injustices, both the injustice of one's own community and the oppression forced on one. He spoke against the infighting between Hamas and Fatah, calling it a "a public attempt at suicide in the streets" and again spoke against Hamas' takeover of
And yet, not all injustices are equal. Darwish always remembered the greater injustice, the larger context: the 60 year occupation of
This loss was personal for Darwish: he was born in the
It was Darwish who in 1988 wrote the Palestinians' Declaration of Independence. Darwish's writings were one of the best ways of giving voice to this dispossession, this loss of land, life, identity, yet refused to give in to hopelessness and despair:
But we have an incurable malady: hope.
Hope in liberation and independence.
Hope in a normal life where we are neither heroes nor victims.
Hope that our children will go safely to their schools.
Hope that a pregnant woman will give birth to a living baby,
at the hospital, and not a dead child in front of a military checkpoint;
hope that our poets will see the beauty of the color red in roses
rather than in blood;
hope that this land will take up its original name:
the land of love and peace.
Thank you for carrying with us the burden of this hope.
Perhaps the greatest way of honoring this poet, this visionary, is to carry on this hope. For many progressives worldwide, the Palestinian/Israeli tragedy remains an open wound, a symbol of the ongoing injustice that entails not only Palestinian suffering but also the very sullying of the Jewish hope for sovereignty, coming at the expense of another people.
Moral outrage and righteous anger are easy, and not lacking in our age. The question is: can they be wed to a love for all, where love and justice go hand in hand, and we continue the "incurable malady of hope" that Darwish so tenderly wrote about. In looking at the malady of the Palestinians, going on for three generations now, it would be easy to give into hate and despair. Yet Darwish said to the Israeli paper Haaretz: "I do not despair. I am patient and am waiting for a profound revolution in the consciousness of the Israelis. The Arabs are ready to accept a strong Israel with nuclear arms - all it has to do is open the gates of its fortress and make peace."
One of the most tender poems of Darwish wove together his memories of childhood and his mother, in that lovely way in which the political and the personal illuminate each other:
Childhood memories grow up in me
Worthy of the tears of my mother.
Whether this mother was his own mother, or the motherland of
Darwish's words have often been censored. In 2000, the Israeli government shot down a plan to include some poetry from this national poet of
As I write these words, there is an ongoing debate about whether the Israelis will allow the body of Darwish to be buried in his beloved homeland. For a people who have lived in exile and dispossession for 60 years, it is a bitter reminder that exile and dispossession continue even after death. Yet here is a final reminder: Jews, Muslims, and Christians, are all part of a shared legacy where God speaks to humanity in words, through words. Words carry the message of God, words to rebuke, words to remind, and words to remind. The age of revelation may have come to an end, but the age of inspired words carry on. The forces of injustice may exile people in their life and death, but here is hoping that inspired words, like those of Darwish, continue to bring humanity together, and come up with a just solution to this acute moral and political crisis of our times.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I grew up in America being taught that Israel was virtuous, and the Arabs were unruly terrorists who liked to hijack planes. Now, I read more,and I think that the Western support of Israel is due to some guilt about the Holocaust. If anti-Semitism had not existed in Europe and America, I doubt if Israel would have been created. Zionism would have remained a controversial topic between Jewish people. But the reality is that England supported the Zionist cause. Europe wanted to get rid of the Jews. Hitler was only the most fanatical and cruel Western leader of many anti-Semites in Europe and America. I believe that all the bloody pogroms enacted against the Jews in Europe and Russia led to Hitler's "Final Solution". Now do you think all the victims of Hitler wanted to leave their homeland, and move to Israel? Did The survivors have a real choice whether they wanted to stay in Germany, Poland,etc.? Or were they encouraged (and outraged enough) to go form the state of Israel by the victors of WWII? The Zionists seemed to learn the worst practices of their enemies,and the Palestinians have borne the brunt of their violence and anger. I don't think that many Holocaust survivors are still alive in Israel, and so now it just seems like a corrupt regime with constant bickering and in-fighting among their leading parties. America and Germany give a lot of aid to Israel in terms of investment and weapons. They seem to hate the Arabs (or Muslims) worse than the Jews. I hope some poet can enlighten me about what these wars and turbulence in the Middle East is leading up to. It isn't peace. What other country is allowed to menace and terrorize their neighbors about whether or not they have nuclear weapons like Israel does? And people wonder in the States why the Palestinians are so militant and unhinged with their suicide bombing. Some people can never get used to exclusion and desperation.
Omid,
I appreciate your care and concern for the way your people are being treated by the news media but I would like you to be just as considerate of the needs of other people groups as you want others to be considerate of your needs as a people. Your comments about Bernie Mac were in poor taste. You said "...Meanwhile, American sites like CNN featured crucial news like the passing away of Bernie Mac and John Edwards' infidelity...". It was a snide and thoughtless comment. So, in your opinion, Bernie Mac's death was unimportant?
Don't belittle his memory because someone you care about did not get the recognition you feel he deserved, please! On the whole, the news media did not give Bernie Mac the recognition he should have received either. Death is still final and many people feel the pain of it, whether the media acknowledges it or not. Please don't discount the death of one person while trying to promote the life of another.
Palestinians might attain the hope of a state IF they crack down on their fellows form shooting missiles and rockets willy nilly into Israeli neighborhoods from territory (Gaza) Israel traded in the hopes of achieving peace.
dear Joyce,
your point about Bernie Mac is well-taken. In fact, I went back and tried to edit the phrase out, realizing that it was written more out of frustration than love.
Still, I do find it ironic, sad, disappointing, whatever we want to call it, that one of the leading Palestinian spokespersons passes with hardly a notice.
omid
Dear Bruce Ramsey,
Your argument would have some merit if it weren't for the simple historical fact that the Palestinians lost 80% of their historical homeland before they engaged in the kind of violence you describe. And you fail to account for the violence that Israel inflicted and continues to inflict on Palestinians.
I don't condone the violence of inflicting terror on civilians, regardless of whether it is done by Palestinians or Israelis. Yet I think simplistic frameworks like blaming palestinians for terror while crediting Israel with hope for peace overlooks the multiple atrocities of the past and present: 1917, 1948, 1967.... it goes on and on. these are important historical realities, and they are open and lingering wounds for people in this region.
we cannot account for the complexity of the situation unless we are willing to stare our shared history face on, and then move to a better tomorrow.
omid
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.