Progressive Revival

A Jewish Perspective on Palin

Thursday September 4, 2008

Categories: Election '08, Jews
"A grand slam home run," the commentators agreed.  More like a foul -- a
very foul -- ball to me.

The subject is, of course, Sarah Palin, whose not-yet week-old candidacy
for Vice President of the United States has sucked up so much oxygen
these last days.  The reflections that follow were composed on day two
of that candidacy -- before we learned of the truncated vetting process,
before we learned of the daughter's non-abstinence, before we learned,
as we did in her maiden speech last night, just how sloganeeringly
mean-spirited she can be, this pit bull with lipstick.  The wonder -- of
Palin and Guliani and Huckabee and Romney -- is two-fold.  A whole
evening, and not only no word, not a single word, re Bush/Cheney, but a
failure to note that for the last eight years, it has been their White
House, for six of  those eight years, their House of Representatives,
for five of those eight years, their Senate.  How can you run against
Washington when it's been your town?

Here;'s how: These people -- and Palin in particular -- are running
against the sustaining myths of the cultural right.  They are running
against pornography and promiscuity and crime, against "European ideas,"
against community organizing, against welfare, against the left-wing
media, against the elites, against "cosmpolitanism."  They present
themselves as the embattled minority, sounding thereby more like Nixon
and Reagan than like either Bush, much less Cheney.  And the reason they
see themselves as the embattled minority is that that is in fact who and
what they are.  Time is not on their side.  They feel themselves
beleaguered, and that is because they are. Truth is, they've not been
treated well, neither by history nor by the cultural elites.  But that's another matter,  Here, some reflections from a Jewish perspective.

But where does she stand on Israel?

The question, of course, is directed at John McCain's featherweight
choice for Vice-President of the United States.  Please note well: This
is neither an endorsement of Governor Palin nor a refutation of her
candidacy. 

No, my concern here is with noting how fatuous it is to begin an inquiry
into a candidate's readiness for such high office with the Israel
question.   It is also a reflection on political anorexia.
Political anorexia?  "On The Issues" is as comprehensive a compendium of
the views of candidates as we have.  (See http://ontheissues.org.)  If
you want to know what Governor Palin really thinks about the great
issues facing our nation, it's a terrific place to browse.  And here is
what you will learn:

On foreign policy: "No issue stance yet recorded by OnTheIssues.org." On
homeland security: "No issue stance yet recorded."  On free trade, on
government reform, on immigration, on drugs: "No issue stance yet
recorded."  On jobs, on families and children, on principles and values,
on technology: "No issue stance yet recorded."  On war and peace, on
welfare and poverty: "No issue stance yet recorded."  (These may no
longer be entirely accurate; in the days since her selection, Palin's
web site has begun to be fleshed out.)

Now I do not want to exaggerate here.  The Governor is not a blank
slate, not at all.  She has positions on a number of issues.  For
example, as quoted in both the Juneau Empire and the Anchorage Daily
News, she is opposed to all abortion, even in cases of rape or incest.
On teaching creationism and intelligent design, her position is "Teach
both. You know, don't be afraid of information.  Healthy debate is so
important and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of
teaching both.  And, you know, I say this, too, as the daughter of a
science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be
given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject -
creationism and evolution.  It's been a healthy foundation for me. But
don't be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides."
No to stem cell research, no to civil rights for gay couples, no to gun
control  (including praise for the Supreme Court?s 5-4 decision to
overturn Washington, D.C.'s ban on handguns), yes to the death penalty;
she believes "that health care must be market-and business-driven,
rather than restricted by government;" a year ago, soon after visiting
Alaska National Guard troops in Kuwait, her press office released the
following statement: "Governor Sarah Palin today informed Alaska
National Guardsmen and women serving in combat that big game hunting
opportunities will be available when they return from combat zones this
fall."

And so forth.

Still, she's a woman, and that counts for something.  Think of Margaret
Thatcher, of Golda Meir, of Indira Gandhi, of Angela Merkel, of Aun Sung
Suu Kyi, of Mary Robinson.  Can't you see Sarah Palin joining that
august sorority after four years of on-the-job training - or sooner, if,
heaven forbid, need be?

We all know about that hypothetical 3 A.M. call that Hillary Clinton
used to such good effect during the primary season.  Surely it's fair to
ask the less melodramatic question, not at all hypothetical: How
comfortable will you be knowing it's Vice President Palin sitting at the
side of the president at 3 P.M. when disaster strikes, crisis erupts,
tragedy befalls us?   And who would you prefer take the awesome call
when the president himself is indisposed?

Enough of that.  I know what you're waiting for.  You're waiting to
learn where she does stand on Israel.  Even if it isn't the first
question that comes to mind, it's not entirely trivial.  So let me be
perfectly clear.  I do not for second accept the rumors of Palin's
association with Islamic terrorism.  The slender fact that if you spell
"Alaska" half-backwards you come up with Al Aksa, the name of Islam's
third most holy shrine, right there on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, is
surely inadequate as evidence of such an association.  True, there are
those who say that her biography is simply too spotless to be credible,
that she must therefore  be part of a sinister sleeper cell.  While the
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, the FBI vetting process
is reliable, no?  Conspiratorial thinking is neither appropriate nor
helpful.   So scotch the rumors; do not pass them on.

Instead, pay attention to what Jewish sources and friends of Israel in
the United States told Israel's YNet just the other day - that "the
Alaska governor has maintained very warm relations with the small Jewish
community in the state, which comprises roughly 4000 people."  Moreover,
and this one's the killer, "Palin [has] met with Israeli Foreign
Ministry official David Akov, who served as Israel's Consul General for
the Pacific Northwest Region.  During the meeting, the two discussed
cooperation between Israel and Alaska on various issues, such as
counter-terrorism efforts. Akov invited Palin to visit Israel and the
governor expressed her desire to do so. She also reportedly told Akov
that "'Alaska's residents love Israel.'"

Awesome.

And one more thing, almost delicious. "The winter sky of Alaska is a
Talmud of gray, an inexhaustible commentary on a Torah of rain clouds
and dying light," Michael Chabon writes in his The Yiddish Policemen's
Union, so brilliantly set in Alaska, so idiosyncratic.  Oh to know what,
if anything, Sarah Palin took away from Chabon's book (soon to be a
motion picture by the Coen brothers).  What can a devout Christian
understand of the chaos of Chabon's imagined universe?  Or, perhaps,
what does a native Alaskan get that remains alien to those of us so
decisively non-Alaskan?

Advertisement
Comments
Debra
September 8, 2008 12:41 AM

To Richard:A woman`s right to choose is really called murder.It(abortion) kills an innocent baby.The baby did not have a choice so therefore it did not choose to die./Creationism is in the book of Genesis.You need to read it.Creationism can be tested.You were created and born were you not?/We are not agaist stem cell research we are against embryonic stem cell research.Big difference!A baby does not die in the stem cell research but it does die in the embryonic stem cell research./As for carbon dating and your opinion that the earth is 5 billion years old:I suggest you read "Foot Prints In The Ash"and look at Mount Saint Helens

Mo
September 8, 2008 9:27 AM

Thank you for your perspective. I will be voting for Obama. I have been watching and reading everything possible with regard to this election because I hate politics. The fact of the matter is that politicians will say anything to get the vote of the people. Most importantly, neither McCain, Obama or Biden have experience making executive decisions and Sarah Palin would be the only one of the four to have done so even if only for a little over a year. I am not entirely comfortable with either candidate or their VPs. However, I prefer to vote for a candidate who is slow to anger, willing to listen to the advice of others and make informed decisions with the country's citizens' best interest in mind, has worked for the people at the community organizational level because as a Christian it does show me that he has done the work of that of Jesus, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Mahatma Ghandi, and countless other caring human beings before him, who makes race a non-issue when it comes to relationships, who loves and cares for his family as much as Palin and McCain do theirs, and who has hope and desire to make a change. Hope and desire is where one starts when taking the steps towrad reaching a goal. I really like the fact that he is not all about negative remarks and flat out lying on his opponents. I understand that he has to debunk a lot of lies about himself and that it is necessary for both parties to point out the negative and incorrect things about their opponents, but it bothers me when they laugh at the accomplishments of Obama. Everyone has different paths and his path is an honorable one too. I don't much care about his experience because both candidates will have a staff of people advising them and it is a good thing that people across the country are excited to mend strained alliances with the U.S. from these last 8 years. My husband has been obessessed with this entire campaign and we watched very carefully for the issues we face to be discussed. I was disappointed to hear Palin speak in the manner that she did because it was the typical put-downs and failure to speak to the issues. John McCain was just boring to the core. I don't think that I need to be entertained, but I need to know that these people can relate to middle class people like me and my family and friends. I don't care that her daughter is pregnant, but I do care if there is double talk going on about her Alaskan dealings and there is. For God's sake her own people call her a hands-off governor. I also need to hear from a candidate and I feel that it is insulting to avoid the press' questions when we all have questions about someone we know little about. Obama has answered questions under fire, Biden has answered questions and so has McCain, but not Palin. I am not interested in voting another candidate into the highest office of this country who thinks they are above the law, belittles our rights as citizens, or who bullies and makes us feel unpatriotic for asking questions and having a difference of opinion. I want to actually feel that change will be the mission of the next President and after all of the note-taking (because they are all saying the same thing at this point) I have not been able to see a hint of change in the ideas of the Republicans. I have been to the tax policy center site and seen the breakdown of taxes and there are differences in how much the middle class will have some breaks (we will benefit more so with Obama's plan) but I am not concerned so much with that. I am mostly concerned with the overall economy. I am, on a personal level, concerned with employment, housing and health insurance. I am working on my doctorate. I have been in school literally all of my life. I have been laid off my job for two years now and cannot find permanent employment. My husband is a doctor and cannot find work that will pay him what he is worth. Our son has lost his jobs several times. Our other son is working two jobs and receiving financial aid (thank God!) in order to get his college education. Our family of 7 is living off of a $40,000 salary and we don't all have health insurance at this time. We almost lost our home and had to sell it for little to nothing. We are now renting a home. Gas prices make it almost impossible to go anywhere. Bill collectors are calling. We have to do the ultimate no-no and dipped into our retirement funds to survive, which has been depleted. We have had to use food stamps in the past. My husband was working as a pizza delivery person. We have both received and used up our unemployment benefits. Temporary employment agencies cannot even find us jobs and now I am applying for jobs as substitute teachers for little money. My degreed friends are being laid off their jobs for a second time in almost two years and are unable to find jobs as well because they are overqualified. We sought the American dream and have seen it, like so many other Americans, wash away. It offends me to watch these analyst make fun or make light of the stories that are being told by Democrats about Americans and their struggle to survive. I even heard a woman on Morning Joe call the stories a "two headed baby...being used as bowling balls". ??? My life is important. My ability to reap the benefits of my hard labor and education is important. I don't care to be rich if it means being insensitive and unable to relate with others. I care about being able to enjoy the fruits of my labor. I have watched the video clips of republicans demeaning Hilary Clinton and her ability to deal with men and the russians and their statements telling her to stop whining and deal with the criticism of the public. At the same time, those same people are balking at the idea of the press asking questions of Sarah Palin's abilities. ??? What works for one does not work for another? I don't doubt that Obama, McCain or even Biden are men of good character. They all have great qualities and great life stories. I cannot say the same for Sarah Palin. There is not much available to the public nor is her record completely maverick as she has apparently successfully tried to convince the public. This is the part of politcs that makes me sick to my stomach. The lies. The half-truths. The apparent quest to make people forget the obvious things. The double talk and the nastiness in the ads. It is hard for me to find any of them believable when they rip each other to shreds and then turn around and ask us to support their party's candidate. Bigoted? Political? Yes. They are all rich. They are all subject to flip-flop on issues. They all have lobbyist relationships. How is John McCain a maverick? He voted with Bush 95% of the time. Is it because he knew he would need his support when he ran for President? Most assuredly, yes. How is Sarah Palin a maverick if she has received lobbyist money herself? Come on people! I may be in the minority when I say that they are all manipulating us to some extent. Abortion is not my issue. I think it is completely a private matter. It is also a privately spiritual matter. I also think that it is an issue of irresponsible sex and that we need to as family members see to it that our daughters think of themselves and that consequences of their actions. They are the ones left with the decisions in most cases. I also understand that single women are not the only people who get abortions. I know that married couples often face this issue as well. WHo am I to get involved. I understand the issue of murder of unborn children, but who is going to take care of the children when they are born into this unwanted situations? Who is going to care for them if the mother can't and the father won't? The state? The public? Republicans? Democrats? Grandparents? Therapists? American already has the highest pregnancy rate in the world. Our youngest citizens are the poorest as a result of their single parent family status. I would like to help, but my family can barely survive as it is. I would like to scream out CHOOSE LIFE and speak of the joys of raising a child, but how can I if I can't help them and assure them that life will be a stuggle but they will be alright (even if they have no money, no family assistance like Sarah palin's daughter). If I were Mr. Buffett, the richest man in the world, I would attempt to heal the world of its ills, but that is not going to happen in reality. I am not rich and we cannot heal the world. I am voting for Obama. I am voting for him because I believe with Biden on his side he will stick to the issues of the people. I believe his hope and belief that we can change the world is inspiring and Christ-like. I also think that in reality he will do his absolute best to work for the people he serves. John McCain/Sarah Palin are just going to continue Bush's legacy. I am not interested in helping corporate America or even rich people. I don't care if they get taxed. Even if they do have higher taxes they are still rich. The poor and mostly the middle class carry this country. If we suffer the entire country suffers. It is an ordinary reasoning and not quite so simple, but that is my choice. I believe Barack Obama is a nice with high hopes. I want to know that my brother will serve this country in Iraq and return home to his family to receive the recognition and veteran's assistance he deserves when it is all said and done. I have had enough of the fear-talk, the cockiness of Bush-Cheney who have profited greatly doing the dirty deeds of Karl Rove and starting a war that will never end (we will always be a target) and who have shady relationships with the very people they have convinced many Americans were evil. Now that I think of it, why would anyone want to be President at this time? They have nothing but a mess to clean up and a trillion dollar debt to look forward to? Maybe I will vote for McCain and Palin so Obama won't get blamed by the forgetful American public for the troubles of this country due to its horrendous leadership.

Alfred
September 8, 2008 12:07 PM

Bat_Yaacov, I just love how you believe the hype about Obama, you know, all the lies and smeer tactics. Obama was never raised a Muslim and even is he were, he undoubtedly is not one now. Christians have killed countless more Jews then any Muslim could ever have imagined and yet Obama being tied to Muslims is so adverse. Why not a Muslim President, or Jewish one for that matter. Let's please stick to the facts, Obama has always been on the side of the poor and working class. He doesn't mention his African grandmother bercause he does not really know her and his white grandmother did raise him. Big deal he's African, or Black, so was Ephraim, Mannassa, the wife and descendents of Moses and even David had African blood flowing in his rich veins. Enough already with the smeer tactics!!

Naomi Marie
September 8, 2008 8:32 PM

How is this woman a representative of me?

I share her exact birthdate and year.

She does not use a voice that brings consciousness or compassion to the world. I dare say that Hillary is a more compassionate person than Sarah Palin.

How does a woman proclaim that God has a war against muslims and hopes her child is going on God's war. Then say she is pro-life. Why is a child that is born less precious than one in the womb?

Look at the video of her speaking on youtube.com This is not hype. These are her words.

She is willing to impose her beliefs and rationalize God's will onto others. This is dangerous. This is the essence of a crime, to impose your will on another.

McCain is a war monger. He wants war. He believes in war. He does not have a voice of reason and he will not reach out to heal the deep wounds that have been made in the international community.

Bush and his cronies have made a great windfall. They have supplied themselves with the Blackwater army. Yes, the emperor has an army now. google it. Read the history of the payments made from your tax dollars to these company. They where next to our troops with good equipment while our men died and were mamed.

This must become a rational campaign. We must look at the results of the actions of the people. The results have been a disaster that has gotten worst over the last 8 years. Obama does have a record - he has worked tirelessly to uplift people.

We must become a clear headed people. Not controlled like monkey's by the media. We must look to the good of all, who is the most willing to take a broad interest in our rights? In our humanity.

I have friends whose parents lived in Germany in the 1930s. The say as they watch the internal manipulation of the masses and the erosion of the civil rights, it is all to familiar to the unspeakable history their parents lived.

McCain does not have what it takes to pull together an international healing for our country. We need a man who can speak many people's languages. We have to have a man that appeals to people of many races and colors. We are in a dangerous place in the world. We have to wake up to the situation that we have been put in and correct it rationally now.

Steve
September 12, 2008 3:55 AM

When God says don't do it . Homosexuality or Abortion . Republican or Democratic ? o your home work !
Vote for God Christians ... Love you all . Steve

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.