There were four highly ironic moments for me last night, watching the RNC on television.
First, Rudy Giuliani seemed to side with down-to-earth, rural, moral, family-friendly middle America against the urban, educated, gay-friendly, divorcing East Coast elite - and neither he nor the crowd seemed to notice the irony. At least Sarah Palin - with her pit-bull-in-lipstick line - didn't pretend to be something she wasn't.
Mike Huckabee blessed the audience with preacherly quasi-religious sentimentalism in the grand old tradition of American civil religion. Did I sense echoes of ... Jesus shed his blood for your sins, but John McCain shed his blood for your freedom (and your desk in elementary school)? This from the party that accuses Senator Obama of being messianic?
And Sarah Palin proved she had the confidence to mock and misrepresent a candidate 18 million of us voted for. She proved without doubt her ability to speak fluently the language of old Washington politics, while claiming to offer something different. This double-speak made a good impression on some, proving her political viability, and sadly, they may be right.
Something deep inside me winced last night, not only because I felt that things and people I value were being mocked and insulted, but also because I felt that last night's rhetoric - in spite of all the flags and "God bless America's" - is bad for America. The so-called "enthusiasm gap" between the parties may have been narrowed, but the gap of respectful understanding and civil communication between parties was split farther asunder. That is not helpful. That is not good for America. I felt our nation was wounded last night. It was "Republican Party First," which was the fourth irony.
I worry that in writing these words, I'm adding to the division, but I fear that if I don't say anything, I'm tacitly supporting something insupportable, and allowing something harmful to go unchallenged.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I am amazed Pastor Mclauren that you would support a candidate that condones the killing of unborn children as well as many other things that are opposed to a Christian Worldview. Let's just say for the sake of argument that his pro-abortion veiws are the only thing that is biblical wrong with Barack Obama. The same thing happened in the early 1930's with the rise of Hitler. The german christians refused to be what some would call today 'single issue voters.' Please tell me something that is more important than protecting the lives of unborn children? I pray that you change your mind and not live with regrets at an old age as did King Solomon who was very wise and influential yet made errors that ultimately caused Israel to fall. I respect your leadership and what you have done for the church, but, please, reconsider your position.
i don't understand how (republicans/evangelicals) say they are against abortion because it is murdering innocent lives and yet would vote for a party that promotes and justifies war? seriously? where is the consistency here? before we go on blaming anyone voting for Obama or pro-choice, to rant about the value of life and yet would vote for a president or party that justifies war is VERY hypocritical and absurd....is there a value scale of life I"m missing here? innocent babies yes, soldiers and innocent iraqi citizens no? everyone's life is important, christian and muslim!!! what is this "christian worldview" people are ranting about? if you promote life, i believe the war right now is more detrimental, literally day by day, than the abortion issues which is still illegal (which in fact causes many people to go get illegal abortions that is more damaging) and something we can work on over time and conversation.......people are dying DAILY in Iraq, where is our priority here? let alone the reason for the growing deficit that is feeding a war, we began, unjustly and unprepared...c'mon people!!!
and mr. clayton roberts....nice christian worldview....comparing obama with hitler? are you serious? so anyone voting or associated with obama are like the nazis? thank you for your historically accurate assesment...actually if you were to check your facts straight, the right wing fundamentalists and some evangelicals share values and beliefs more closer to hitler's...in fact, hitler used ideology and words, some misquoted and some sadly true, of martin luther to justify the jews as the fault for the downfall of germany for it's role and blame for WWI...but mr. roberts, doesn't your "christian worldview" or shouldn't it i should say, promote the love of Christ (the good news) into the world to reconcile, heal, help, listen, serve more than making accusations (please becareful with your deductive reasoning, because there are plenty of christians who are pro-choice and in no way are we blindly promoting nor condoning the killing of innocent unborn children), blaming, judging, and making horrendous statements (tying a painful dark moment in history with a prominent and history making african-american figure).....so what does this worldview look like? because it sure doesnt sound like anything i've read in the bible
Hmmmm....definitely time for another christian woman to comment on the Palin choice. I understand Brian to be respectful in his approach to dialogue. But I totally understand him when he says that he must speak out lest he be complicit in his silence. As everybody learns and reflects upon Palin I find that I am not rendered "giddy" (as some gals have literally been described) by a prominent woman who seeks to break oppressive glass ceilings if that woman's not willing to bring along everyone with her up through those ceilings. Honestly, and it's certainly her prerogative, Sarah Palin only seeks to empower SOME WOMEN. And she doesn't advance, much less embrace, feminist theory or theology for what it more deeply suggests: a holistic empowerment/moral deliverance of ALL PEOPLE. For example Palin's not interested in bringing along the Gay/Lesbian/Bi community into all the rights that she freely enjoys. She's not interested in bringing along all classes of people into a system of affordable healthcare. She's not interested in bringing unmarried teens into programs that will equip them with a range of effective birth control methods -- she's actually willing to allow even more young, immature girls to wind up pregnant and facing very difficult reproductive choices (while not all the Levi Johnson's of America want to be daddies with their Bristols). In this very important campaign she may be McCain's gritty co-pilot when it comes to his spending reforms, the Iraq occupation and energy policies. But, like a good flight attendant, she also gives a semblance of cabin security and safety while serving beverages with spunk (feminism with sugar? feminism with a twist of lime? feminism-lite?). No surprise that fiscally conservative women and socially conservative "faith moms" are enthusiastically drinking it up; I might be guzzling it too if I were sitting in the privileged first class section or if I were choking down the stale, dry, pretzels of scripture teachings that insist upon a woman's limited role in her local church or her marriage.
"I worry that in writing these words, I'm adding to the division, but I fear that if I don't say anything, I'm tacitly supporting something insupportable, and allowing something harmful to go unchallenged."
Brian, I agree with this statement. I, also, have come to the conclusion that to remain silent is not the right thing. No MORE!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.