Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival

The effect of anti-Muslim rhetoric in this year’s elections

posted by Shahed Amanullah | 12:36am Friday November 21, 2008

If there was any doubt as to the depth and extent of
anti-Muslim feelings among portions of the US electorate, this year’s
presidential elections have most certainly put it to rest.  The extent to which candidates and
voters alike propagated anti-Muslim themes in order to support a political
agenda has been unprecedented. 
Nearly every major candidate relied on fear of Muslims at some point to
stir voter sentiment through fear: 
Mitt Romney often
railed
against “radical Islam”, Rudy Giuliani routinely
invoked
the spectre of “Islamic terror”, Fred Thompson warned that the US is in a “global war with  radical Islam”, and John McCain called the fight against “radical Islamic extremists” the “transcendent challenge of the 21st century”.   Even Barack Obama, who was
himself the target of anti-Muslim sentiments – tapped into this theme when he
called upon Americans to wean themselves off of Middle Eastern (i.e. Muslim) oil.

Voters – many of whom I would guess couldn’t tell the difference between
an Islamist and the Muslim next door – responded to these overtures with one of the most
sustained and organic email campaigns in recent memory.  Repeated tales of Barack Obama’s
alleged Islamic past and/or present were so effective that in one
Texas survey
taken only a week before the election, 23% of all voters
still believed that Obama was a Muslim. 
The level to which people clung to this meme despite two years of
repeated statements in the media to the contrary is a startling reminder of how
deep-seated the fear of Muslims remains.

It didn’t stop there.  One of the more ambitious attempts to stoke anti-Muslim feelings in
order to sway the election was the mailing of 28 million copies of a DVD entitled “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against
the West” to households in swing states. 
Like the emails and statements above, the “Obsession” film blurs the lines
between violent radicalism and ordinary Muslims, playing into legitimate fears that
many Americans still have in the wake of 9/11.

But despite the extent and volume of anti-Muslim rhetoric, candidates who embraced these methods this year universally failed to get elected.

From the earliest days of the primary, campaigns seemed to
falter in direct proportion to the extend politicians tried to make anti-Muslim
feelings the foundation of their campaigns.  Giuliani and Romney, by far the more strident of the
Republican candidates, found no traction with the anti-Muslim arguments and
dropped out early.  In contrast,
John McCain – who rejected Pastor Rod Parsley’s endorsement solely due to his
anti-Muslim comments and publicly stated that Muslim-Americans were qualified
to hold any office in the land – rose to the top of his party.

There’s another beneficial side effect that this rhetoric
had: it galvanized Muslim-Americans to take control of their own political
destiny.  After all, if you’re
already a part of the elections (in an imaginary sense), why not dive in
yourself and provide some Muslim reality? 

While Muslim-American organizations took a low profile for
fear of unwittingly contributing to the stigma, everyday Muslims took it upon
themselves to get involved at a grassroots level, where they could stay under
the radar and confront anti-Muslim feelings at a personal level.  Buoyed by an affinity for Barack Obama,
in part due to the slings and arrows that he took on their behalf, thousands of
Muslim-Americans gravitated to his campaign and fought back through the
political process.  And Muslim
Republicans, though smaller in number, worked from within the party to excise
anti-Muslim sentiment, with some degree of success.

Will the next crop of presidential candidates learn from the
lessons of 2008 and stick to more meaningful issues than who can be harder on
Muslims?  Only time will tell, but even
if they don’t, there will be a new generation of Muslim grassroots political
activists in both parties waiting to confront them.



Previous Posts

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.&nb

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on websites either directly or more subtly (e.g., Sarah Palin

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like most other progressive activists, I understood that a pres

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Values or Partisanship? TV Ad calls out Graham for caving on climate
by Keely Brewster It was disappointing that Lindsey Graham changed his mind, values, and opinions surrounding climate legislation. Lindsey Graham was right when he discussed the need to decrease our dependence on foreign oil for reasons of national security, economic security, and job loss. Lindsey

posted 2:32:58pm Jun. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Susan T.

posted November 21, 2008 at 3:25 pm


The major selling point of this year’s election campaigns was fear. This so disheartens me and is possibly why Obama’s campaign message of hope won him the majority vote. I am tired of the message of fear. It permeates everything in mainstream media. We are told to be afraid of the economy, our food, our air, and worst of all, our neighbors. Why not sell peace?



report abuse
 

Asinus Gravis

posted November 21, 2008 at 3:57 pm


This is a badly muddled essay. It nonsensically equates Middle Eastern oil with “Muslim oil,” as if anything or everything found in the Middle East is automatically “Muslim.” The noted failure of candidates pushing anti-Muslim sentiments does not support the claim that there is widespread and deep anti-muslim sentiment in the USA. By contrast, the election of Obama is widely perceived as indicating a decreasing extent of racism in the country. Further, SA seems to inexplicably equate criticisms of Islamists (anti-Islamist) with being anti-Muslim. It looks like SA is trying to play an I-card or an M-card in the essay, but badly botches the job.



report abuse
 

Anastasia

posted November 22, 2008 at 8:02 pm


What exactly is the difference between ‘an Islamist and the Muslim next door’? Are there two different Qur’ans, ahadith and Sira?



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted November 24, 2008 at 11:44 pm


I agree with Susan T. The warmongers, lead by the Neocon wing of the Republicans and the nonpartisan Zionist AIPAC lobby, took every conceivable opportunity to try brainwashing everyone else into believing their false and negative stereotypes about Muslims and Arabs. Contrary to their propaganda, if the millions of Muslim and Arab Americans are decent, patriotic Americans like most all other American ethnic groups, then there would be no way of scapegoating them as a rationale for falsely attacking Iraq, Iran, as well as continuing their aparteid treatment of Palestinians. Like the class bully, the warmongers needed to demonize the Muslims and Arabs to beat up on them and to justify their own claims for more excessive force. Most intelligent Americans saw through the false attacks from the warmongers and decided to vote for more peace and less bullying.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.