Broken Communion
On December 19, Brian McClaren published a well-intentioned post on this site suggesting that Christians put aside all their political and cultural differences and focus on their common faith in Jesus Christ. As it happens, I read Brian's piece the...
I am in the same boat with you, Ed. I guess what we are is believers in Christ, but not so much in the Church. I am a pastor and I am often frustrated by the restrictive attitude my companions in ministry have. I prefer to hold open the doors and invite everyone in (I think there was a parable or something about this, don't you think?). You lose nothing by welcoming everyone to Christ's table, but you only stand to lose by blocking even one person who might otherwise discover a better path. Well, I can't get reservations at those high class, bow tie & tails Diners either. So I suggest we keep the doors open, the lights on, and see who comes to the party. Religion ain't a reward (if it is, they need to rethink the compensation package), its a way of LIVING.
McClaren wrote, "When respectful conversation and 'generative friendship' happen, as Etheridge suggests, all parties are changed."
Change is clearly a two way street in McClaren's view--it affects "all parties."
Perhaps what is holding Ed Kilgore back here is fear that he may end up changing a bit. It is easy enough to think that those old Dixie Baptists need to change--and they do desperately need to change for the better. It is somewhat more daunting to contemplate having to, or needing to, change oneself.
Some of those good ole boy Baptists are deep down decent, good hearted people, who do a hell of a lot of good for those less fortunate in this world.
So, what are you afraid of Ed?
Let's not over-complicate this. As a Baptist minister, I know exactly what your minister meant. As Baptists, truth is not based on traditions, creeds, confessions, teachings, etc (as with Catholics). Our teaching is based on the Bible (more than any other denomination). I hope this doesn't sound arrogant - I'm just trying to make this short and blunt.
Anyway, the Bible does teach that communion is for believers only. This should be obvious. Communion is a confession of the Cross. Furthermore, the Bible also teaches that we should "examine" oneself before partaking. This is a PERSONAL confession. Baptists (in general) would instruct a congregation, but leave the taking of the bread and cup up to the participant. Why? Because Jesus is our great high priest (not the minister) - see Hebrews. Catholic priests withhold communion (because Catholics apparently don't read Hebrews). So let's not confuse how both groups operate.
In short (and in a Baptist tradition), do you need to be a believer? Yes. Your choice to partake in communion at that point is up to you. To do so Biblically, one must "examine" oneself and prepare properly for such a confession.
jestrfyl, remember I mentioned there was a UCC Church in our bible buckle city that I noticed sometime last yr.? When I checked it out this mo. on the net, it said things have settled down now and they were setting up a new site. A new Minister was replaced in Sept., there was no mention about human rights as the article brought out in the newspaper in the last yr. Guess they sent that one packing.
I'm right up there with you, Bro. Ed! Try being a Pentecostal pastor (such as myself) and a progressive! Hee...hee...hee. It's not always easy -- but one thing to remember is that faith supercedes patriotism, it trumps nationalism -- and that in Jesus Christ all are equals. One young lady once asked me why it was ok for churches like the one our Brother pastors (Baptist) to send women (as missionaries) among the "heathen" in "foreign" lands to "christianize" them, often placing their lives in imminent danger, but the organization won't let them "have an American pulpit" because "women pastoring would be a sin."
Just as the slogan I liked from a few years back: "The Moral Majority is neither!"
Not that I have any stones to throw (I don't). However, let's get beyond this current religio-/political mess and really show the world the love, grace, peace, and mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ!
I wonder just how strong one's faith is, when the Bible needs must be inerrant and one's love of God is proved through the depth of one's hatred for those whom one fancies do not follow God's will.
Living as I do in Europe and being confronted, as I am, with the hateful fundamentalist Christians who have completely destroyed all unity in my American family, I have had it up to here with the conservative, fundamentalist, literalistic, followers-of-ancient-traditions and however else they hateful people choose to name themselves.
The cherry-picking of the Bible, the careful selection of only those natural sciences which are pleasing, the thinly veiled contempt of women, so much hypocrisy and willfulness is not easy to find in any other group. Since we, as Christians, all believe that we shall someday stand before our maker, I do wonder just what exactly their excuse will be for all the people upon whom they passed judgment, all the families they tore apart, all those who might have found peace in Christ but whom they drove away.
I don't think there can be any resolution or getting along. All we can do is see to it that never again are these hateful people permitted to intervene in the US government as they have over the last eight years. The tyranny of these people against minorities such as us homosexuals is an offense to God.
A simple suggestion would be to follow Jesus as he instructed those who would choose to be his disciples. He did not not teach adherence to greeds or promote dogmas. Just do I as do, I believe was his message. We have chosen to follow another man's interpretation of what he felt Jesus meant by the words he supposely uttered. As we can't be 100 percent certain, as his word were not initially put on paper. I am certain that his disciples did not follow a creed or dogma; they looked directly to him for guidance. I many ways the churches have reconstituted the same old burdens that Jesus warned the people about. The message of the Lord's Prayer is that men and women can commune directly with God and no middle man/institution is required.
Thank goodness for the voices of progressive Christians and those, like Dianna Butler Bass, Marcus Borg, Brian McLaren, Walter Bruggeman and others, who lead us toward the emerging Christianity that has a chance of being relevant and powerful for those of us who are seekers in the 21st century.
Exclusivity has no place in my faith and I encourage all people in my sphere of influence to understand that the Lord's table is for all people in all places in all times. There are no requirements.
Asinus Gravis:
I'm certainly not afraid of exposure to Southern Baptists, having grown up amongst them, albeit in the days before the "conservative" takeover of the denomination and the suppression of "liberal" views in all but a few scattered congregations. And yes, I understand that plenty of these folk are good people living better lives than I am.
But their leaders have drawn lines in the sand on the nature of Christian belief that clearly exclude a lot of people who consider themselves Christians. And while dialogue is always in order, there is indeed a large gulf between us that shouldn't be minimized and isn't going away.
Sam:
To be clear, I wasn't confused or particularly concerned about what I described as a "mild and watered-down" fencing of the altar at the Baptist Church in question. I brought it up simply because it was the departure point for my own "examination of conscience" about this faith community's definition of "believer" and my own.
Ed Kilgore
Salvation is personal. NOTHING anyone else does, no sin or transgression, can affect anothers' personal salvation. HOWEVER, by denouncing others over their 'sins' (reproductive choice, homosexuality, et al, ad nauseum) you have engaged in the sins of Pride and Judgement - no less damning in God's eyes ("For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." - KJV, James 2:10)than anything you are judging others' about. Do not be so eager to force others to believe or act according to your religious interpretation because you yourself shall also be held accountable. Do not worry about the motes in others' eyes when you have lumber in your own. In other words, shut up and do the right thing all by yourself and leave everyone else alone.
It appears that Russ Carter's message is "It is all about me!"
The Great Commandment thus becomes: you shall love your God (yourself) with all of your heart, mind, soul, and strength; and then you shall love yourself some more. Don't waste any of your heart, mind, soul, or strength on anyone else. End of sermon.
It is wonderful how this approach transforms the gospel into following a course of rampant self-interest.
When I wrote my post, I hadn't read Damon Linker's New Republic piece that trod much of the same ground, though he focused very specifically on the Anglican schism.
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/linker/archive/2008/12/23/religious-development-of-the-year-2008.aspx
Damon, a former editor of First Things, knows a lot more than I do about contemporary Christian conflicts. But he appears to agree with my unhappy hypothesis that culturally-focused liberal-conservative disputes have largely displaced traditional confessional and doctrinal differences as the key fault lines in American Christianity.
Ed Kilgore
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.