As this is my first post on Progressive Revival, let me take a moment to thank the Powers that Be at Beliefnet for inviting me to participate here. It’s an honor to be blogging alongside the rest of you! My main blogging outlet is my blog on Islam, politics and culture, City of Brass, so I look forward to generating some cross-blog discussion.
I wanted to touch on the matter of California’s Proposition 8 (gay marriage) which was passed successfully despite record turnout and Barack Obama’s long liberal coattails. I was intrigued by this angry comment by parallelsidewalk, who was raised Mormon and briefly entered the fold of Islam for a few years:
A lot of people here distrust American Muslims because they think of them as an alien presence with morals and prejudices that are incompatible with our way of life. I’ve come to distrust American Muslims because they’re exactly as petty, mean, and self-serving as any other group of Americans. And for all the whining and carping they do about how hard it is to be a Muslim here, oh how eager many of them were to join up with the people who call them devil-worshipping terrorists to deliver a Brooklyn-style beatdown to someone a little lower on the social ladder. I’m talking of course about support for propositions 8, 2, and 102, which most muzzies couldn’t wait to vote on.
Of course, as there are plenty of intelligent and conscientious followers of Muhammad, a few spoke up, said that this was wrong, and either for practical or ethical reasons (or both), opposed the measures. And good for them. But you know what? Fuck the rest of them. Seriously, I never want to hear again, even once, from anyone who supported props 8 or 102, that they’re a victim of discrimination. Boo fuckin hoo. How d’ya like them apples?
Muslims are far from alone here. Mormons are upset now because the same people they spent thousands of dollars disenfranchising are showing up at their doorstep to call them on it. Wait, it’s RELIGION. You have to respect it and not punch back when it punches you, right? Wrong. Every Mormon who voted for or contributed money to 8 is liable, and angry gays (and their straight allies) were absolutely within their rights to go back to the source and confront them.
I’m curious about the assumption that muslims voted generally for proposition 8. I don’t have any assumptions either way, nor do I have any evidence. I will note that Nate Silver had a post after the election about some Prop 8 myths, specifically about Black and Latino support:
the notion that Prop 8 passed because of the Obama turnout surge is silly. Exit polls suggest that first-time voters — the vast majority of whom were driven to turn out by Obama (he won 83 percent [!] of their votes) — voted against Prop 8 by a 62-38 margin. More experienced voters voted for the measure 56-44, however, providing for its passage.
Now, it’s true that if new voters had voted against Prop 8 at the same rates that they voted for Obama, the measure probably would have failed. But that does not mean that the new voters were harmful on balance — they were helpful on balance. If California’s electorate had been the same as it was in 2004, Prop 8 would have passed by a wider margin.
Furthermore, it would be premature to say that new Latino and black voters were responsible for Prop 8′s passage. Latinos aged 18-29 (not strictly the same as ‘new’ voters, but the closest available proxy) voted against Prop 8 by a 59-41 margin. These figures are not available for young black voters, but it would surprise me if their votes weren’t fairly close to the 50-50 mark.
At the end of the day, Prop 8′s passage was more a generational matter than a racial one. If nobody over the age of 65 had voted, Prop 8 would have failed by a point or two. It appears that the generational splits may be larger within minority communities than among whites, although the data on this is sketchy.
I haven’t seen any exit poll data that broke down the vote for/against Prop 8 by religion, so it’s hard to make an analogy, but support for gay mariage is probably just as generational among muslims as it is for blacks and latinos (and note that blacks do include a significant muslim fraction).



posted December 12, 2008 at 12:56 pm
I imagine a great deal of the anger coming from many homosexuals is based on what we see of Islam on TV and read of it on the Internet.
Indeed, one of the most common comparisons of the legal status and treatment of homosexuals by fundamentalist Christians in the US is to the Islamic world – it being otherwise very difficult to find any other culture which tortures, murders and actively, aggressively discriminates against us outside of these two groups.
I live and teach in Europe. Of my students from Islamic countries, most are young gay men and independent minded women who see their schooling in the West as the first step to escaping the horror of their original homelands. A few (without exception these are Arabian) begin the semester by being truly nasty to me, expecting me to cower. Boy do they get a shock! I’ve spent my life dealing with the hatred and brutal, physical violence of my brother and his fundamentalist Christian family, these kids aren’t even armed.
A very small percentage are neither looking to stay in the West nor do they have any investment in the hatred which we here associate with Islam.
This is a good thing, it takes away my “right” to throw all adherents of Islam into the same pot and righteously hate them for hating me.
Are there differences of degree within Islam? Is there anything resembling the non-hate-filled-Christians one finds in the West? I may not even travel to Iran, for instance, and from what I have seen of North Africa, it hardly seems a very welcoming religion for women, homosexuals and dogs.
Sorry if this seems so terribly hostile, I will soon be leaving my country, where I am a human with full-civil rights and a partner and spending Christmas in a country, the US, where my partner is not even considered a relation, nor I a full-human entitled to civil rights. Tends to jaundice my views.
posted December 13, 2008 at 8:32 am
I understand how people conflate and become hostile towards Islam in a reflexive fashion.
Now, within some predominantly Muslim countries homosexuality is strenuously repressed. Iran is the obvious star candidate here, with the pictures of teenage boys being hanged for being gay. With these types of images and the psychotic-politics of Iran, it is not surprising to see gays associating Islam with extreme homophobia.
See http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2005/10/shocking_new_ph.html
posted December 13, 2008 at 10:49 am
Or course, Iran doesn’t have any homosexuals – they execute them.
At least in America, they only fire them, beat them, deny them equal rights, lie about them Only occasionally are they murdered, but not by the State. (Unless we count spiritual violence – a practice usually confined to self-described “Christians” – but then again, “the State” does favor anti-gay religions and their tenets – in law!)
posted December 14, 2008 at 11:15 am
Let me just respond to your comment about Mormons being upset at the backlash. First let me say that Mormons are not upset at the backlash but rather how the gay and lesbian community seems to pick and choose who to pick on. I mean who has more power and influence than Barack Obama who is publicly against gay marriage. Don’t hear a lot of outrage there??? Or the fact that the voting population of California is only 2% Mormon. Or the fact that the black and latino population voted overwhelmingly for prop 8. Or that the money donated to prop 8 was paid for by tax paying citizens. Or that a church would be targeted for drawing a moral standard. It’s the irony that upsetting. The obvious bigotry against Mormons by a group that calls us bigots. That’s upsetting.
posted December 14, 2008 at 4:51 pm
First let me say that Mormons are not upset at the backlash but rather how the gay and lesbian community seems to pick and choose who to pick on.
Funny you should mention that. The LDS church has a great many moral standards; why have you chosen LGBT citizens as the victims of your hate, rather than coffee or wine drinkers, or people who divorce and remarry? Where’s your support for a statewide ban on remarriage? Why does enshrining the so-called “sanctity of marriage” into law only matter when LGBT citizens want equal rights, and not when Britney Spears can marry a guy for 55 hours in Vegas? It’s not LGBT citizens who are doing the “picking and choosing” here.
I mean who has more power and influence than Barack Obama who is publicly against gay marriage.
He also publicly spoke out against Proposition 8. LGBT activists aren’t mad at him (though there is some disappointment that he couldn’t do more) because he’s on the right side on Prop 8 – though people who believe in equality and civil rights wish he would be pro-marriage as well as pro-civil-unions.
Or the fact that the voting population of California is only 2% Mormon.
Yet a much larger percentage of the money used to prop up the Hate Amendment came from LDS members and organization. So the LDS church was trying to exert influence significantly in excess of their proportion of the population.
Or the fact that the black and latino population voted overwhelmingly for prop 8.
But the level of coordination and activism in favor of Prop 8 was much higher from the LDS church than from the African-American and Latino/a communities.
Or that the money donated to prop 8 was paid for by tax paying citizens.
I’d qualify that. Much of the money in favor of the Hate Amendment came from out of state, from “Christian” Right groups in the South and of course from LDS members in Utah, Nevada, Idaho, etc. They weren’t “taxpaying citizens” in the state where the hate law was being passed.
Or that a church would be targeted for drawing a moral standard.
Nobody’s targeting the LDS church simply for their hate and bigotry toward LGBT citizens. We’re attacking the LDS church – and all other hateful organizations that propped up the Bigotry Amendment – for their desire to enforce their “moral standard” on everyone else. They have a right to their moral standard, misbegotten though it is; they don’t have the right to impose their standards on the population at large.
The obvious bigotry against Mormons by a group that calls us bigots.
When you attack LGBT citizens’ rights, they probably won’t like you much. The proper response would be to repent of your hatred, bigotry, and anti-American advocacy and start working to right the wrong of Proposition 8. Instead, the LDS church is trying to play the victim in a pathetic attempt to hang on to their hate and bigotry, and enlisting demagogues and charlatans from the “Christian” Right (who would gladly call them heretics, and who invariably will say that Mormons are not Christians) in doing so.
posted December 14, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Its not clear to me which direction you are aiming your sarcasm.
posted December 15, 2008 at 10:29 am
It wasn’t sarcasm, Aziz; it was facts.
And if you can’t figure out the direction, maybe you shouldn’t be blogging on the topic.
posted December 16, 2008 at 10:57 am
Thanks Aziz,
Great quotes and observations. But is there any record of Muhammad himself saying something about homosexuality? Is it anywhere in the Quran? Are there “red letter” Muslims who prioritize what Muhammad said over other voices, and how do they feel about the issue?
posted December 17, 2008 at 11:50 am
The only piece of Islamic holy scripture that deals explicitly with homosexual practices is the Qur’an, which mentions the story of Sodom and Gomorrah (even there it just says “indecency” without mentioning homosexual actions directly), but unfortunately scholars in three of the four Sunni madhhabs have interpreted this to mean that homosexuality should be punished by death. Of course, this “official line” hasn’t always been toed in Islamic societies, where homosexual love has a prominent place in traditional literature. So I would say that there is a profound tension between the acceptance and absolute condemnation of homosexuality in Islamic societies historically. However, with the advent of modernity and especially since the rise of the gay rights movement in the West, Islamic societies have reacted in an extremely defensive way, often staging witch-hunts against homosexuals as well as, in some cases, public executions. I know from my time in Egypt that the notion of gay marriage was openly ridiculed in the public discourse as well as in film. Including same-sex couples in the institution of marriage will mean changing very deeply ingrained traditions all over the world – and as always, these traditions will be given strong religious justifications.
posted January 17, 2011 at 8:59 pm
That is well known that money can make us free. But what to do when one doesn’t have cash? The only one way is to receive the loans or just secured loan.
posted February 28, 2011 at 4:43 pm
I noticed that my academic success was based on originality of essays I wrote. So, I attempt to order custom essays at essay papers service , which can hire only professional experts!
posted March 2, 2011 at 8:08 am
Thank you, it’s very amazing information about this topic it might be very kind for students. Recently i needed resume writing service. To my admirable surprise, resume was honest the price I paid for it.
posted March 3, 2011 at 3:09 am
The lecturers demand to analyse the skills of writing, moreover, you need to opt for dissertation writing service to order student dissertation. In such way people show the writing technique. And also you would take thesis writing.
posted March 5, 2011 at 12:30 am
I value your knowledge about this topic. I had to tell that I did not look at a kind of master thesis writer before. Could you compose the very correctly finished thesis writing and graduate thesis?
posted March 5, 2011 at 7:35 am
Teachers guess that big effort only is required to complete good academic paper. But, everything isn’t very easy and common college students cannot manage with their papers. However, I do know writers who can assist you when you buy custom term paper. These specialists assisted me a lot of times.