Guest Post by Rev. Debra W. Haffner, Director, Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing a multifaith organization with more than 4400 religious leaders in its network.
First, you need to know who I am. I am a Jewish Unitarian Universalist sexologist minister. I am heterosexual, married, middle aged, the mother of two children, and the author of parenting books. I am the co-founder and director of the Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing, a network of more than 4400 religious leaders from more than 50 faith traditions that affirm sexual justice issues.
And my heart broke a little last week when the President-elect selected the Rev. Rick Warren to offer the invocation at his inauguration. Perhaps like you, I was elated on election night. I've worn a button that says
The American people have not just elected the first African American president, they elected a pro-choice, pro-family planning, pro-sex education president; a president who said the words "gay and straight" in his acceptance speech. My heart sang.
So, I don't know how to make sense that Rev. Rick Warren was chosen for this honor. Some commentators have suggested it was a symbolic way of reaching out to the evangelical community that overwhelmingly did not vote for him. People said the selection of the Rev. Joseph Lowery, a civil rights hero, to do the benediction balances out Rev. Warren, showing the range of faith values in the
But, I keep coming back to the fact that the Rev. Warren has compared abortion to the Holocaust and homosexuals to pedophiles and incest perpetrators. I keep coming back to the fact that the Saddleback web site says that homosexuality is sinful; read it yourselves. I can't forget that until two days ago, it also said that people who were homosexual were not welcome as members of the church community: what happened to "love your neighbor as yourself?" Did Jesus ever exclude anyone from worship?
And I can't help but wonder is there any way that the inaugural team would have chosen a minister who held racist or anti-semitic views for this place of honor? Would it have been seen as insignificant if someone who worked on poverty but also had spoken out against
Most of the people who have been quoted in the media protesting this decision have been gay and lesbian secular leaders. But I'm offended too. Millions of us worked tirelessly for this election because we believed in change, and that change would mean an end to the attacks on reproductive justice and LGBT persons' civil rights. We understand that until all adults have the right to consensual sexual relationships and all loving adult couples have the right to marry, our own sexual rights are not secure. In fact, Saddleback until two days ago said that cohabitating heterosexual s were not welcome as members either. We're all just a little less sure that we can count on the change we've been promised.
In this season of Advent, we are indeed waiting and praying that our hopes--not just for the new administration, but for us all--are realized. And I'm praying to let go of this dismay so I can truly celebrate on January 20th.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I am bothered that President-elect Obama would reward the man who treated him unfairly at the Saddleback Forum, displaying clear preferential treatment for Sen. McCain. And I think we do not do Mr. Obama and his team any favors if we remain silent about any mistakes they make. Two come to mind right now.
Remember "Joe the Plumber?" (Who can forget? I know.) Well, to me, the worst part of that whole incident is that Mr. Obama brought that situation on himself. He sought out the controversy, so confident of his abilities to play the role of conciliator. And it bit him on the hand! (Of course, "Joe" was none too happy with Sen. McCain, either, as we have now learned.)
The other thing the Obama campaign really blew was the announcement of his VP. After word had leaked out that it would be Biden, why in the world did they wait so long to make it official? I think they misread and misplayed that situation. Badly.
As for Pastor Warren? Why reward the popular preacher. Warren is a guy who is in way over his head, spiritually. He is arrogant, and often does not know what he is taking about. I know he is generous and knows how to talk about humility. But I think he is mostly a media player. I think he already has way too much power and attention!
Surely, there had to be someone available who is more genuinely spiritual and more solidly and soundly grounded, intellectually and theologically. Pastor Warren is a disappointment. No question.
"Your Name", I really don't know where to begin. Pretty much every point you made was ridiculous. I love how you blame Rick Warren for Obama's missteps at the civil forum (it couldn't be that Obama just had a poor performance, right? The blame must be given to Warren). Also, you clearly don't get Rick Warren. "He is a guy who is in way over his head, spiritually"? What a bizarre thing to say. So what does a "genuinely spiritual and more solidly and soundly grounded, intellectually and theologically" pastor look like? Let me guess: A universalist, liberal pastor who makes no truth claims about same-sex marriage and abortion? Does that sound about right? He is a "disappointment" to you, because his worldview is on the complete opposite spectrum of you and many who blog on this website.
Rev. Haffner, your article was good, and I understand what you feel, and how you're processing your feelings. Having had this many days to try and understand Obamas choice I think I get now. At first I worried for the GLBT, as I'm a member of PFLAG. I read the comments after articles on Advocate.com, and listened to their disappointment and shock of his choice; some had given money they really couldn't afford to Obamas campaign, some had worked the sidewalk, knocked on doors, and telephoned for days. You have to remember these people have been on the bottom rung of society for so long that even a nudge of insincerity can knock them down. Obama knows what he is doing, and just have faith in his way of doing things. As far as R. Warren being any worse than some other Evangelical Denominations in how they disparage the GLBT, well they wouldn't have been any different. It's hearts, and intelligence that have to change peoples view of the GLBT, and that means any Bible Literalist, not just R. Warren.
Bob,
You don't have an understanding of what Unitarian Universalism is, by the tone and wording of your post. Check out http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml to know what we really believe before you make noises about it. Judaism is one of the faiths that forms the basis of UUism. You also seem a bit fuzzy on Judaism itself, as it is not only a religion, but also an ethnic identity for many who do not necessarily practice the religion.
I am still shocked at the anger and bitterness among the spiritual community about Obama.
I understand you didn't vote for him, I understand you don't like his values.
I get all that.
What I don't get is why you cling to fear and anger rather than moving forward in hope, reaching across to grab a hand and working with others toward healing this nation, even the world.
I don't want to bash parties.. it's pointless. I do want to invite everyone here on Beliefnet to hold our new leader in truth, light and love. Jump on board the train with those who did vote for him and together let's do what we can to bring this nation back to greatness.
Love is contagious,
Donna
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.