| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The Colbert Coalition's Anti-Gay Marriage Ad | ||||
| ||||
There were a lot of good spoofs of the National Organization for Marriage's video The Gathering Storm. This one called a $#it Storm of Intolerance wins first runner up. But again, the Colbert Report wins the prize.
What all of this means is best said by Frank Rich's column in the Sunday New York Times
What gives the ad its symbolic significance is not just that it's idiotic but that its release was the only loud protest anywhere in America to the news that same-sex marriage had been legalized in Iowa and Vermont. If it advances any message, it's mainly that homophobic activism is ever more depopulated and isolated as well as brain-dead.
It is interesting that this one issue is really what divides progressive and conservative Christians. Even the most conservative Evangelical has seen the light (after years of feet dragging) of the inherent value in the helping of the poor although there is still considerable arguement about how that is best accomplished. It is the gays that divide the camps now.
The reasons are complex but one way of looking at it is that progressives listen to the people who are experiencing the effects of bigotry and oppression and believe that their testimonies count when gauging whether society and religion should reconsider policies or beliefs regarding these same people. Conservatives undervalue these same voices in favor inherited narratives and traditions whose importance is weighted according to longevity.
I am a progressive because I believe that we are constantly learning and improving in the ways we understand and value human difference which includes race, gender, culture and sexual orientation. I value these voices as testimonies of truth that have every bit as much weight as any person before them. As gay people become fully accepted as human beings, society and eventually religions will change to reflect that new understanding. May that day come quickly.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Amen. As a young person who started off as an evangelical in the religious right movement, I decided to leave the evangelical church because of their vicious attack on our gay and bisexual brethren. Young people, including young Christians, are turned off and outraged at how evangelicals mistreat and persecute our gay friends and family. It is time progressive Christians stand up and be heard. We will not allow you to hurt our gay and bisexual brethren any longer!
Paul, thank you.
One of the saddest things I have encountered in dealing with the conservative American Christians is their refusal to budge from their self-righteousness.
Science and medicine have long since acknowledged that we homosexuals are merely a normal and useful variation on sexuality.
Our desire to have society recognize the basic human right of two people joining together in marriage to support and comfort one another is the antithesis of all the nasty, horrible things they ascribe to being gay and the "homosexual lifestyle".
Their presumption that I "desire their approval" is leaves me speechless. I don't desire anything from them than that they take their hatred back out of the government of this great country and let me live as human and citizen with equal rights. Their hatred has a place for them in their churches, it saves them from following God's call to work through their own sins. Fine, no problem. Just get out of my life.
Ultimately, this is going to go the way of interracial marriage rights. The scorched earth politics of the conservative American Christians is going to leave deep wounds and insurmountable barriers which will only heal and only be breached through the death of the older generations.
Good to see that ad hominem attacks are something the 'progressive' party isn't progressive enough to leave behind, as well as the mindset that 'things will only be okay once everyone we agree with is dead.'
Viereck was right. The only remaining prejudice is anti-Catholicism. And consider how well that Catholicism is doing in comparison with the 'progressive' Episcopal Church.
Good to see that ad hominem attacks are something the 'progressive' party isn't progressive enough to leave behind,
Ad-hominem attacks like what? Calling bigotry what it is? If you're enacting hatred of LGBT people - and if you are in any way advocating that LGBT people should receive anything but complete acceptance as equals in society with the rest of their fellow human beings, you are indeed enacting hatred of LGBT people, whether or not you like to dress it up in the rather pathetic pablum that is "love the sinner, hate the sin" - you're acting as a bigot. The solution to this is not to whine that the person calling you out on your bigoted words and actions is engaging in a personal attack - it's to stop being a bigot.
as well as the mindset that 'things will only be okay once everyone we agree with is dead.'
No, things will only be okay when it's no longer acceptable in society to victimize LGBT people verbally, physically, or legally, just as it's becoming less acceptable (though sadly not by any means completely gone) to victimize African-Americans, women, or the disabled verbally, physically, or legally. I would rather that happen sooner than having to wait for the Kuhnian paradigm shift to take hold. I would rather have bigots take responsibility for their bigotry and repent of their hatred. I would like to think that our society is capable of change.
The only remaining prejudice is anti-Catholicism.
My gay and lesbian friends would disagree with you there. Last time I checked, Roman Catholics can legally marry in every state in the Union. Last time I checked, walking down the street while wearing a crucifix (an outward sign of Roman Catholicism) didn't subject the person wearing it to the risk of beatings or verbal abuse, as does walking down the street while displaying the outward signs of homosexuality or gender queerness. Last time I checked, our Vice President is a Roman Catholic and it's a complete non-issue; do you think the same would be true if our Vice President were a gay man or lesbian?
But of course, it's easier to play the victim than to question how your own church's hatred, bigotry, and discrimination - and this is by no means solely directed at Roman Catholics, as many evangelical and most fundamentalist churches are guilty of the same sin - serves to marginalize, oppress, and deny the rights of others in society. It's much easier to stamp your feet and whine about "anti-Catholic prejudice" than it is to address your own privilege.
But adults are marked by their willingness to take a hard look at themselves and their own blind spots; it is children who protest any challenge to their worldviews with desperate temper-tantrums and whines about being called names.
Goodness, Tim, how wonderful that you, of course, don't ever engage in any sort of attacks at all.
Except for those attacks you support on my human rights.
The same constitutional protections which let your Catholic church practice its hateful, spiteful persecution of homosexuals permits me to call you and your hateful church exactly what you are: Bigots.
Don't like it? Tough. Even the former head of the inquisition and now Bishop of Rome and prime supporter of the torturers and murders in places such as Uganda no longer has the authority to impose upon me. Je suis désolé...but, who knows – Bush nearly succeeded in his plan to torture Americans citizens for their own good, perhaps you shall yet have your chance.
Why those who are the oppressors demand that we, the homosexuals and transgendered, the very victims of their oppression, cease calling them what they are is beyond me. And it would take torture to stop me from telling the truth.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.