Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival

Bible Bill vs America

posted by Paul Raushenbush | 1:26pm Friday May 22, 2009

Word has it that Rep Paul Broun (GA) has introduced new legislation called National Year of the Bible Resolution a.k.a. the Bible Bill making the year 2010 the Year of the Bible.   The Bible Bill panders to Rep. Broun’s bible base, but it isn’t really an American endeavor.  Since the beginning, our country has been intently pluralistic (not atheist mind you, but pluralist) and celebrating the Bible would be fine if we were to have the Bhagavad Gita Bill in 2012. 

A few years ago, I wrote an op-ed that ecouraged an interfaith caucus in the congreess. In Rep. Broun’s misguided bill there might be something that would work.  There is a new movement of people of different religious traditions reading one another’s sacred texts as a means of better understanding the tradition, the moral principles and world vew held within. Even Evangelicals are getting involved.  If Rep Brown were to team up with other members of congress from different faiths (Keith Elison of Minnisota comes to mind) to declare a year of sacred texts then this might be more American, and would be a very worthwhile bill.

But my guess is that he is not interested in a true recognition of the plurality of sacred traditoins in America and that this is just a small ploy in the “America is a Christian Nation” effort.  I’m sure it will die a timely death.



Previous Posts

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.&nb

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on websites either directly or more subtly (e.g., Sarah Palin

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like most other progressive activists, I understood that a pres

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Values or Partisanship? TV Ad calls out Graham for caving on climate
by Keely Brewster It was disappointing that Lindsey Graham changed his mind, values, and opinions surrounding climate legislation. Lindsey Graham was right when he discussed the need to decrease our dependence on foreign oil for reasons of national security, economic security, and job loss. Lindsey

posted 2:32:58pm Jun. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(9)
post a comment
Blue Collar Todd

posted May 22, 2009 at 2:56 pm


Well maybe a year was too ambitious. Maybe just a month, week or day would be better for a start? Follow Hawaii’s example of creating Islam Day but have Bible Day which is far more inclusive terminology.



report abuse
 

hootie1fan

posted May 22, 2009 at 4:01 pm


Something tells me he’s not talking up the Catholic version.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted May 22, 2009 at 4:31 pm


Is Rep. Broun simply out of step, or is he trying to misdirect the nation’s attention? What benefit would he gain from such a seemingly benign bill? Which Bible does he have in mind? Would he include the Apocrypha? What about the gnostic books? Why not include other Holy Writ from other religions?
All in all, this seems to be not merely a useless bill and a waste of legislators time – it is another attempt to drive a wedge between religious communities. In many ways this seems to be a suspicious move. It certainly will benefit no one except Bible publishers – and even they might not make much.



report abuse
 

hootie1fan

posted May 22, 2009 at 5:10 pm


Is Rep. Broun simply out of step, or is he trying to misdirect the nation’s attention? What benefit would he gain from such a seemingly benign bill?
***************
He represents a district in Georgia. Easy political points without having to do anything with actual substance.



report abuse
 

Robert

posted May 23, 2009 at 1:15 am


As I have noted elsewhere, one when I was driving through the honorable Representative’s home district in Georgia, I saw too billboards obviously made by the same company side by side. One read “Jesus saves,” and the other listed a street address under the caption “Totally nude.” That’s the depth of Christian faith in Georgia.



report abuse
 

bucolic.social.leper

posted May 23, 2009 at 8:15 am


I think it is a ridiculous bill. Even if we had a “Year of the Koran” and a “Year of the Dhammapada” and so on, I doubt that anyone would include a “Year of Ingersoll’s Lectures” for Freethinkers. This would be necessary to balance things out and hitting every group and book would take forever. Let’s just compromise now and skip the whole thing.



report abuse
 

Rob the Rev

posted May 23, 2009 at 9:39 am


Just what translation or denominational bible is to be honored? Hmmmmm……? I vote for the Jeffersonian bible.
The U.S. Congress should be doing relevant legislation not passing “Year of the bible” bills. Bible bills are a violation of the First Amendment separation of church and state.



report abuse
 

JonTemplar

posted May 24, 2009 at 12:15 pm


LOL…why don’t we just bring back the Holy Roman Empire! Haven’t these baffoons learned anything these past 8 years? When an entertainer dare voice an opinion about something in politics everybody wants to call them out. But this love affair with sneaking a state sponsored religion into our government is just fine with the same smarmy deceived people. You want a state sponsored religion move to Cuba or Venezuela. I think you will feel right at home.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted May 25, 2009 at 10:26 pm


Howzabout a ‘Let’s Re-name America Jesusland Once and For All’ Bill?
Sheesh!



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.