For the last month, I've been in Australia and only occasionally heard news from the United States. I haven't minded too much missing arguments over health care and the Supreme Court confirmation hearings. But I have fretted about missing the General Convention of the Episcopal Church--my own denomination's triennium meeting now happening in Anaheim.
I know that sounds a little crazy. After all, what kind of church geek would be jonesing for a denominational meeting while looking out her hotel window at the Sydney Opera House?
But this meeting was particularly important for Episcopalians. Six years ago, in 2003, my church confirmed the election of Gene Robinson as the first openly gay bishop in the worldwide Anglican Communion. That meeting made international news and led to a painful theological backlash from conservative Anglicans and some churches in Africa and South America. Three years later, in 2006, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution of "restraint" at the convention, committing itself to conversation and no further ordinations of bishops whose "manner of life" (i.e., they were gay or lesbian persons) was offensive to other Anglicans. This, too, made news as conservative Anglicans launched a political and legal assault to divide the Episcopal Church and drive a wedge between American Episcopalians and the larger body of Anglicans around the world.
And now, in 2009, six years have passed. Episcopalians have done a lot of talking, some serious crying, much worrying, and have tried to honor the wide diversity of Anglicans around the world. We didn't ordain any more gay or lesbian clergy as bishops. We practiced restraint. We listened. We tried to be nice. We prayed. Yesterday, the Convention meeting in Anaheim summed up what Episcopalians have learned in that process.
By a 2-1 margin, Episcopalians agreed "that through our own listening the General
Convention has come to recognize that the baptized membership of The Episcopal
Church includes same-sex couples living in lifelong committed relationships characterized
by fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and respect, careful, honest
communication, and the holy love which enables those in such relationships to
see in each other the image of God."
And the Episcopal General Convention equally has come to understand
"that God has called and may call such individuals, to any ordained ministry in
The Episcopal Church." In plain
English, the Episcopal Church has now formally recognized the lived reality of
faithful same-sex Christian couples in our community and that the Holy Spirit
may call persons in such relationships to Christian ministry--even the ministry
of bishop.
This affirmation
doesn't demand that anyone do anything or anyone be forced to believe something
they find offensive. Indeed, in
the resolution, the church stated that Christians are not of a unified mind and
that Christians "of good conscience" may disagree in regards to these
concerns. But the resolution also
does two important things: 1) it
recognizes that many, many Episcopalians are perfectly comfortable and open to
being part of a diverse spiritual community that includes gay and lesbian
brothers and sisters; and 2) that local dioceses may chose their bishops by
discerning the best candidate for ministry without restriction placed on sexual
identity.
Some may argue that
the Episcopal Church has broken faith.
No, Episcopalians are struggling to be faithful and to live justly as
our society widens its understanding of human relationships and marriage. The attempt to do so is not somehow
"secular" or untraditional.
Rather, adapting to local cultures is an important part of being
Anglican.
Around 600, Pope
Gregory the Great saw a group of blond-haired children in a slave market and
was told they were "Angli," or "Angles," from Britain. Gregory replied, "Not Angles, but
Angels" and dispatched missionaries to the British Isles. He instructed the missionaries to work
within the context of the culture they encountered in order to preach the
gospel and spread the church. These
first missionaries accommodated their message to many of the spiritual practices
they found in pagan England. It is
deeply Anglican to believe that God works within human cultures, in all their variety. As recently as 1988, when African
Anglican bishops asked that the church permit polygamy as a Christian practice,
western Episcopalians and Anglicans approved the tradition of multiple wives as
an appropriate expression of faith in some cultural contexts.
The same Anglicans
who have been mad about Gene Robinson for six years will continue to be
angry. The same Anglicans who have
threatened schism will continue to threaten. Maybe Anglicans in the rest of the world won't understand. Some people will see this as
unbiblical. But, trying to figure out faith in particular cultural contexts is Anglican tradition. For 1400 years,
Anglicans have believed weaving together the message of Jesus with human
culture and experience is the best way to embody the love of God and
neighbor. We don't always do that
perfectly, but we are trying.
After all, we're Anglicans not Angels.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I dont agree one bit with gays or lesbians being ordained into my faith. Im not saying we shouoldn't love them as christ would and has loved us, but, I am saying they shouldn't be put in a role of sheopherd of My Lord's people.
Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed for the practice of homosexuality. Paul writes about sexual immorality several times in the Epistles. And It says several times that God made man for woman and woman for man.
Being Gay is not natural if it were then God would have made adam and Steve. But this is not the case and my Episcopal leaders are very very naive to allow this atrocity to happen. I view Homosexuality as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. They need a 12 step program.
Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed for the practice of homosexuality.
No, they really weren't, much as you'd like to believe in your bigotry that they were. They were destroyed because the men of the town wanted to gang-rape the visitors. That isn't remotely analogous to or reflective of homosexuality, any more than male-female rape is reflective of heterosexuality.
Paul writes about sexual immorality several times in the Epistles.
Again - I've asked several times and none of you have done this. Please demonstrate to me that the same-sex sexual practices of first-century Roman culture - in which men would take boys as sex-slaves - is at all analogous to our contemporary understanding of homosexuality. If you can't do that, then in the name of consistency you also have to throw out all of the other things we do to put Scriptures about slavery, marriage, gender roles, etc. into context.
Being Gay is not natural if it were then God would have made adam and Steve.
Automobiles aren't natural; if they were then God would have put a '57 Chevy in the Garden of Eden.
But this is not the case and my Episcopal leaders are very very naive to allow this atrocity to happen.
Atrocity? Genocide is an atrocity. War is an atrocity. Worldwide hunger is an atrocity. Even if you oppose the ECUSA's position, it hardly rises to the level of an atrocity.
I view Homosexuality as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. They need a 12 step program.
That's a funny coincidence, because I view anti-gay bigotry - which includes believing in things like the idea that homosexuality is a disease or a shortcoming - as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. But the solution to anti-gay bigotry isn't a 12-step program, it's a three-step program:
1. Realize that your attitude of bigotry has real, material consequences for millions of LGBT individuals worldwide, and that by holding such views and silently assenting to the promulgation of those views, you are in some way complicit in this country's pandemic of anti-gay violence and hate;
2. Repent of your attitude of bigotry and hate and change your views to support full equality; and
3. Take action to support equality, including speaking out in your church and in the public square.
It's really that simple. Won't you take those steps today?
I never thought I'd see the day Rob Roy was lamenting the fate of Father Jake. Amen.
James.........
How do you explain these scriptures....
"Leviticus 20:13
"'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable."
This is not about rape. Why is lying with the same sex detestable?
Romans 1:24-27
Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator-who is forever praised. Amen.
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."
What did God mean about sexual impurity, degrading their bodies with one another?
What did God mean by unnatural relations?
What were indecent acts with other men?
None of these were about rape. So what sin where they doing?
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
What does one have to do to be sexually immoral?
What this does say is that idolaters, adulterers, prostitutes and homosexuals, thieves, the greedy,those who are drunk, slanderers and swindlers are sinning.
If this was the only scripture we had about marriage and sex, this says it all.
And Jesus answered and said unto them, “Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”
God instituted this union. He created them different, female for male. The ONE man leaves his MOTHER AND FATHER and is joined to his ONE wife....and they become ONE. Nothing else should change this.
It might have been different in the OT but Christ came and we are bound to what He says.
Your commitment to 'inclusivity' hasn't helped stop any financial or membership hemorrhages, has it? Your church just had to lay off 30 members, including some of those responsible for evangelism/membership increases.
2.15 million out of 305 million and shrinking. Without all the old WASP money, you'd be about as important as the Greek Orthodox.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.