Progressive Revival

Not Angels, but Anglicans

Wednesday July 15, 2009

For the last month, I've been in Australia and only occasionally heard news from the United States.  I haven't minded too much missing arguments over health care and the Supreme Court confirmation hearings.  But I have fretted about missing the General Convention of the Episcopal Church--my own denomination's triennium meeting now happening in Anaheim.

I know that sounds a little crazy.  After all, what kind of church geek would be jonesing for a denominational meeting while looking out her hotel window at the Sydney Opera House? 

But this meeting was particularly important for Episcopalians.  Six years ago, in 2003, my church confirmed the election of Gene Robinson as the first openly gay bishop in the worldwide Anglican Communion.  That meeting made international news and led to a painful theological backlash from conservative Anglicans and some churches in Africa and South America.  Three years later, in 2006, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution of "restraint" at the convention, committing itself to conversation and no further ordinations of bishops whose "manner of life" (i.e., they were gay or lesbian persons) was offensive to other Anglicans.  This, too, made news as conservative Anglicans launched a political and legal assault to divide the Episcopal Church and drive a wedge between American Episcopalians and the larger body of Anglicans around the world.

And now, in 2009, six years have passed.  Episcopalians have done a lot of talking, some serious crying, much worrying, and have tried to honor the wide diversity of Anglicans around the world.  We didn't ordain any more gay or lesbian clergy as bishops.  We practiced restraint.  We listened.  We tried to be nice.  We prayed.  Yesterday, the Convention meeting in Anaheim summed up what Episcopalians have learned in that process.

By a 2-1 margin, Episcopalians agreed "that through our own listening the General Convention has come to recognize that the baptized membership of The Episcopal Church includes same-sex couples living in lifelong committed relationships characterized by fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and respect, careful, honest communication, and the holy love which enables those in such relationships to see in each other the image of God."  And the Episcopal General Convention equally has come to understand "that God has called and may call such individuals, to any ordained ministry in The Episcopal Church."  In plain English, the Episcopal Church has now formally recognized the lived reality of faithful same-sex Christian couples in our community and that the Holy Spirit may call persons in such relationships to Christian ministry--even the ministry of bishop. 

This affirmation doesn't demand that anyone do anything or anyone be forced to believe something they find offensive.  Indeed, in the resolution, the church stated that Christians are not of a unified mind and that Christians "of good conscience" may disagree in regards to these concerns.  But the resolution also does two important things:  1) it recognizes that many, many Episcopalians are perfectly comfortable and open to being part of a diverse spiritual community that includes gay and lesbian brothers and sisters; and 2) that local dioceses may chose their bishops by discerning the best candidate for ministry without restriction placed on sexual identity. 

Some may argue that the Episcopal Church has broken faith.  No, Episcopalians are struggling to be faithful and to live justly as our society widens its understanding of human relationships and marriage.  The attempt to do so is not somehow "secular" or untraditional.  Rather, adapting to local cultures is an important part of being Anglican. 

Around 600, Pope Gregory the Great saw a group of blond-haired children in a slave market and was told they were "Angli," or "Angles," from Britain.  Gregory replied, "Not Angles, but Angels" and dispatched missionaries to the British Isles.  He instructed the missionaries to work within the context of the culture they encountered in order to preach the gospel and spread the church.  These first missionaries accommodated their message to many of the spiritual practices they found in pagan England.  It is deeply Anglican to believe that God works within human cultures, in all their variety.  As recently as 1988, when African Anglican bishops asked that the church permit polygamy as a Christian practice, western Episcopalians and Anglicans approved the tradition of multiple wives as an appropriate expression of faith in some cultural contexts. 

The same Anglicans who have been mad about Gene Robinson for six years will continue to be angry.  The same Anglicans who have threatened schism will continue to threaten.  Maybe Anglicans in the rest of the world won't understand.  Some people will see this as unbiblical.  But, trying to figure out faith in particular cultural contexts is Anglican tradition.  For 1400 years, Anglicans have believed weaving together the message of Jesus with human culture and experience is the best way to embody the love of God and neighbor.  We don't always do that perfectly, but we are trying.  After all, we're Anglicans not Angels. 


Advertisement
Comments
Your Name
July 23, 2009 5:01 PM

I dont agree one bit with gays or lesbians being ordained into my faith. Im not saying we shouoldn't love them as christ would and has loved us, but, I am saying they shouldn't be put in a role of sheopherd of My Lord's people.
Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed for the practice of homosexuality. Paul writes about sexual immorality several times in the Epistles. And It says several times that God made man for woman and woman for man.
Being Gay is not natural if it were then God would have made adam and Steve. But this is not the case and my Episcopal leaders are very very naive to allow this atrocity to happen. I view Homosexuality as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. They need a 12 step program.

James Gilmore
July 23, 2009 6:20 PM

Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed for the practice of homosexuality.

No, they really weren't, much as you'd like to believe in your bigotry that they were. They were destroyed because the men of the town wanted to gang-rape the visitors. That isn't remotely analogous to or reflective of homosexuality, any more than male-female rape is reflective of heterosexuality.

Paul writes about sexual immorality several times in the Epistles.

Again - I've asked several times and none of you have done this. Please demonstrate to me that the same-sex sexual practices of first-century Roman culture - in which men would take boys as sex-slaves - is at all analogous to our contemporary understanding of homosexuality. If you can't do that, then in the name of consistency you also have to throw out all of the other things we do to put Scriptures about slavery, marriage, gender roles, etc. into context.

Being Gay is not natural if it were then God would have made adam and Steve.

Automobiles aren't natural; if they were then God would have put a '57 Chevy in the Garden of Eden.

But this is not the case and my Episcopal leaders are very very naive to allow this atrocity to happen.

Atrocity? Genocide is an atrocity. War is an atrocity. Worldwide hunger is an atrocity. Even if you oppose the ECUSA's position, it hardly rises to the level of an atrocity.

I view Homosexuality as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. They need a 12 step program.

That's a funny coincidence, because I view anti-gay bigotry - which includes believing in things like the idea that homosexuality is a disease or a shortcoming - as a disease much like drug addiction or alcoholism. But the solution to anti-gay bigotry isn't a 12-step program, it's a three-step program:

1. Realize that your attitude of bigotry has real, material consequences for millions of LGBT individuals worldwide, and that by holding such views and silently assenting to the promulgation of those views, you are in some way complicit in this country's pandemic of anti-gay violence and hate;

2. Repent of your attitude of bigotry and hate and change your views to support full equality; and

3. Take action to support equality, including speaking out in your church and in the public square.

It's really that simple. Won't you take those steps today?

RB
July 29, 2009 3:41 PM

I never thought I'd see the day Rob Roy was lamenting the fate of Father Jake. Amen.

churchmouse
August 5, 2009 12:54 PM

James.........

How do you explain these scriptures....

"Leviticus 20:13
"'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable."

This is not about rape. Why is lying with the same sex detestable?


Romans 1:24-27
Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator-who is forever praised. Amen.
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."


What did God mean about sexual impurity, degrading their bodies with one another?

What did God mean by unnatural relations?

What were indecent acts with other men?

None of these were about rape. So what sin where they doing?


1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.


What does one have to do to be sexually immoral?

What this does say is that idolaters, adulterers, prostitutes and homosexuals, thieves, the greedy,those who are drunk, slanderers and swindlers are sinning.

If this was the only scripture we had about marriage and sex, this says it all.


And Jesus answered and said unto them, “Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”

God instituted this union. He created them different, female for male. The ONE man leaves his MOTHER AND FATHER and is joined to his ONE wife....and they become ONE. Nothing else should change this.

It might have been different in the OT but Christ came and we are bound to what He says.

Phreeque shooooooooooooooooo
August 19, 2009 10:55 PM

Your commitment to 'inclusivity' hasn't helped stop any financial or membership hemorrhages, has it? Your church just had to lay off 30 members, including some of those responsible for evangelism/membership increases.
2.15 million out of 305 million and shrinking. Without all the old WASP money, you'd be about as important as the Greek Orthodox.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.