Progressive Revival

September 2009 Archives

Tuesday September 29, 2009

Stop Religious and Political Hate Speech Against the President

***update***
Read Thomas Friedman's piece in today's New York Times about the parallels between this time in America with President Obama and the time before Rabin was assassinated in Israel in 1995.  

As Progressive Revival readers know, I am worried about the level of violent language that is being leveled at our President.  This article from Religious Dispatches has brought me close to the edge of panic as I really am beginning to fear for our President's life.  I missed this story when it first came out but someone recently brought it to my attention.  Reading that a christian "pastor" is leading his congregation by praying for our President's death is repulsive and terrifying.  

But it is not only religious leaders - recently a sitting member of congress - Rep Trent Franks recently called the President an "enemy of humanity."  He said this at a so-called Values Conference!!! Rep. Franks was specifically talking about President Obama's pro-choice position, but this is hardly an excuse.  The consequences of the rhetoric of death towards anyone who disagrees with the pro-life movement has been clearly demonstrated in the murder of Dr. George Tiller.  

Pastors and politicians should realize that their words are being listened to carefully.  According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, domestic terrorist groups such as the Patriots who carried out the Oklahoma bombings are reforming.  All decent religious people should call upon their leaders to stop religious hate speech against the President.  If you hear it, confront it.

See the article about the pastor praying for Obama's death 

Chris Broughton, 28, made national news when he showed up to protest a speech by President Barack Obama in Phoenix, Arizona with an AR-15 automatic rifle slung over his shoulder and a handgun. While Broughton claims that his (apparently legal) actions were not meant to threaten the president, there was more to the story than a single citizen's dubious actions and pronouncements. Local print and television coverage in Phoenix, and bloggers all over the country, have led the way on an interesting and important story of religion and politics that has been almost entirely ignored by the traditional media.
Here is what they missed.

The night before Broughton's fifteen minutes of fame, he attended a fiery Sunday sermon by his pastor, Rev. Steven L. Anderson, at Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, Arizona. Rev. Anderson, also 28, explained not only "Why I Hate Barack Obama," but also why he and God both want the president dead. "When I go to bed tonight," Broughton's pastor declared, "Steven L. Anderson is going to pray for Barack Obama to die and go to hell." He even goes so far as to claim that:
God appointed [Obama] to destroy this country for the wickedness of the United States of America. God appointed him because that's what our country has turned into. That's who we deserve as a president.

And yet, even though we may deserve Obama, Anderson urges his congregation to pray for the president's death, issuing imprecatory prayers and repeatedly asking God to kill the president. Most dramatically, and in an interesting shift to the passive voice, he said Obama "ought to be aborted" because the president is pro-choice, and therefore a "murderer." Despite all this Anderson has insisted to reporters that he was not calling for vigilante violence. Ditto for Broughton, who told a reporter for the Phoenix New Times: "I don't care how God does it, I'm not going into further detail than that," said Broughton. "It would be better now than later."

"However it happens, I'm going be happy that it happens," he continued. "I'm gonna be a happy man... I would rejoice."

Read the entire story about religious hatred of the president here


Sunday September 27, 2009

Categories: Christians, Environment

Yes Sen. Inhofe, God is "up there" - and God is Pissed

Senator Inhofe is known for his denial of climate change by relying on an ever dwindling number of scientists who believe that our present global warming is part of a cyclical warming and cooling, and insist that human produced pollution has no affect on this cycle.   The important policy implications of this belief is that it paints efforts to curb and reduce such pollution as futile, and certainly not worth the economic hardship they may cost.   The fact that scientists overwhelmingly agree that human pollution is affecting climate change by warming the earth is not convincing to Sen. Inhofe.  When the great majority of scientists agree, generally you can believe them, but, of course, the Senator is right -scientists can be wrong.   Why anyone would want to go down in history as the one who was against reducing pollution is a bit beyond me but he is entitled to his opinion.   I disagree with Sen. Inhofe and the few scientists that he can still cite to support him, but where I know he is wrong is when he brings God into it.

In a video on C-Span, Sen. Inhofe attempts to calm what he clearly views as overly concerned environmentalists and hysterical politicians by graciously reminding us that "God is still up there."  By this, I am sure, he means God is in heaven (up there) and that God is in control and we don't have to worry about climate change because it's out of our hands and safely in the hands of God.  But in his theologizing he is omitting the Christian proposition  that God can be in control even as we exercise our free will disobey God and to  sin against God and our fellow humans.   If one is to speak in theological terms about the environment then one should recognize that God gave humans the privilege and burden of stewardship of the earth and all its resources.   When we squander our resources, destroy the earth's beauty, and jeopardize the health of God's creation then we are sinning and the wages of sin are death. 

If Senator Inhofe is to truly acknowledge the God up there then he should be the first to get on his knees and join with the rest of us to repent of our recklessness with the environment.   It is not too late for us to act in a way that is worthy of the trust that God placed with humans to care for the world.  But time is running out, and so might God's patience.  Yes, God is up there - and God is pissed.

 

Thursday September 24, 2009

The Problem with the Ten Commandments

ABC's Nightline has been running a series on the Ten Commandments in which they explore the issues and dimensions of each commandment in contemporary society.   Tonight's commandment:  Thou shalt not commit adultery.

The series is interesting and, in many ways, inclusive.  After all, the Ten Commandments form the ethical basis of the world's three great monotheistic religions.  Jews, Christians, and Muslims draw inspiration from them and, throughout history, developed the insights of the commandments in theological, moral, social, and legal arenas.  They are very important spiritually, morally, intellectually, and culturally.

But for all their inclusiveness, their interpretation is often the source of division.  It is one thing to say, "Thou shalt not...." and it is often a completely different thing to figure out how the "shalt nots" relate to human experience.  For, despite the moral idealism of the commandments, everyone knows that human beings actually do the "shalt nots."

"Thou shalt not commit adultery" is a good example of the problem with the commandments.  Martial fidelity is a practical way of honoring and respecting one's partner.  To be faithful--even when one might not "feel" like it--is a fundamental way of respecting another human being by taking into their feelings, emotions, and commitments before simply acting on one's personal inclinations.  To stop and think about the effects of one's actions on a larger community (in the case of adultery, thinking about a spouse and children) often inhibits bad choices.  That's a big part of morality--to reflect on one's actions in advance and to consider the communal consequences of behavior.  Moral frameworks--like the Ten Commandments--provide guidelines for such reflection.  And, as such, they form a vision for what constitutes the good society--a society that honors God and neighbor.

The problem comes with the obvious fact that human beings--even reflective and caring ones--don't always act in a way that honors God and neighbor.  We both flaunt and break the commandments on a regular basis.  So, what does society do with the violators?

Throughout history, religious groups have tried to enforce the Ten Commandments through legal means.  We might all agree that theft and murder are wrong and that thieves and murderers should go to prison.  But what about the "lesser" commandments--like adultery?  In Jesus' day, women caught in adultery could be stoned--and that is still the case in many countries around the world.  In early American history, adulterers could be whipped, jailed, divorced with their permission, or forced (as in The Scarlet Letter) to wear a public mark of shame. 

To point up the problem with adultery is only the beginning.  What of those who swear, lie, or worship other gods?  Should society make swearing a crime?  Idolatry?  Being angry at your parents?  Where does this end?  In some sort of Taliban-style legalism where the religion police enforce a literal interpretation of each of these Ten Commandments?  Do we rank the commandments in order of importance?  The bad ones get the most punishment?  The minor ones get overlooked?  The Ten Commandments--for all their moral grandeur--quickly descend into an ethical quagmire of angels dancing on the head of pins. 

The answer is obvious:  Very few people take the Ten Commandments literally.  We contextualize them, trying to discern the origin, intent, and purpose of these commandments in order to create a way of life that demonstrates the deeper wisdom of these teachings.  And we recognize the human disposition toward breaking them--and, to a greater or lesser degree, we offer forgiveness, understanding, and reconciliation toward one another in regard to the Ten Commandments.  And religious communities argue about how much forgiveness, understanding, and reconciliation is appropriate in any given denomination or tradition.   

Taking the Commandments out of context is spiritually and politically dangerous.  To hold up these ten commandments--in Hebrew they aren't even called "commandments;" rather, the Hebrew word is "terms"--to hold up these ten terms of the moral law without reference to the larger intent of the words leads to legalism, violence, and repression.  God intended for the Law to be joyful, a pathway for a way of life of devotion and respect for one other, a blessing and not a curse. Indeed, Jesus--a rabbi himself--made this point.  When asked what was the most important of the commandments, he replied:  "Love God and love your neighbor as yourself." 

That is the summary--the intended wisdom--of the Ten Commandments.  The ten terms of the law should bring us to the basis for a good life:  love.   Is it loving to murder, steal, curse, violate our vows, lie, envy or demean another?  That should be the first question of morality--and it is what the Ten Commandments teach.  

Thursday September 24, 2009

Categories: Abortion, Gender, Homosexuality

Dear Imam, Rabbi or Pastor: The Wrong Embryo Was Implanted, Can We Talk?

Kate M. Ott, Ph.D. is the Associate Director of The Religious Institute: Faithful Voices on Sexuality and Religion

 

On Monday, Carolyn and Sean Savage of Sylvania, Ohio, told the national audience of the Today Show that Carolyn was implanted with the wrong embryo during an in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure.  What if she were to come into your church or synagogue or mosque to tell her story, instead of the Today Show? 

 

For millennia, religious traditions have provided direction, discernment and doctrine on issues of fertility and childbirth, family and kinship.  These themes resound in the sacred texts and historical traditions of every major faith.  Yet most faith leaders and communities are unprepared to deal with issues raised by use of assisted reproductive technologies, or ARTs.

 

The Savages explained they were hoping for a fourth child from the embryos they had created from previous IVF cycles.  Although their two sons were conceived through heterosexual intercourse, their daughter was conceived through IVF after the couple experienced secondary infertility, including 10 years of persistent attempts and miscarriages.  The Savages, upon learning of the misplaced embryo, faced two choices:  terminate the pregnancy, or carry the fetus to term and give the child back to his/her biological parents.  They chose not only to continue this pregnancy, but also to continue to use IVF and a gestational surrogate to have more children.

 

The Savages' circumstances are not an everyday occurrence.  But there is no doubt that the use of ARTs has begun to shift the way we think about reproduction, family structure and children.  More than 3 million babies worldwide have been born using ARTs, and approximately 12% of women of child-bearing age in the U.S. have used an infertility service. 

 

Chances are someone in your faith community has used ARTs.  Clergy and religious professionals must be prepared to deal pastorally with couples and individuals who may use ARTs for genetic screening, acquire donated sperm, egg or embryos, hire a surrogate, or preserve their own sperm or eggs in the case of a severe illness, such as cancer. 

 

These technologies raise ethical issues and moral questions for religious leaders and the families they serve.  ARTs give new hope to those who have been unable to conceive - but at what price?  The technologies often impose unreasonable health risks and an extraordinary financial burden.  High costs restrict the use of ARTs to the well-off and well-insured (and so far there has been no mention of assisted reproduction in the debate over healthcare reform).  

 

The Savages cite religious beliefs for their decisions, but religious beliefs related to ARTs range from complete opposition to caution to encouragement.  What does your faith tradition say about use of ARTs, and what are those teachings based on? Long-held belief in the "blessing of fertility," coupled with an inherent bias for biological children, can lead to repeated attempts at assisted reproduction, when there are other ways of creating family.  It is time to lift up religious perspectives that value diverse family structures and expand our understanding of creativity and generativity in order to guide ethical discernment and inform compassionate counseling.

 

Today the Religious Institute released A Time to Be Born: A Faith-Based Guide to Assisted Reproductive Technologies to help clergy and other religious professionals address the complex pastoral, moral and ethical issues raised by assisted reproductive technologies.  The manual provides an overview of the technologies and how they are used; examines traditional religious perspectives on reproduction and fertility; and outlines a model of pastoral care and counseling that will enable religious leaders to effectively minister to the individuals and communities seeking their help. 

 

Reproductive technologies are sophisticated and ever changing.  By no means can any clergy member or religious professional be expected to know how all of them work or what makes someone a candidate for various technologies.  But clergy and religious professionals do need to know how their faith traditions view ARTs.  The Today Show gave the Savages a forum to tell their story, but couples and individuals choosing to use ARTs should be able to turn to their faith communities for moral discernment, compassionate counseling and support.   

 

Sunday September 20, 2009

Categories: War, prayer and ritual

Praying for Peace (is not as easy as it sounds)

Praying for peace is not as easy as it sounds.  Praying for peace requires two separate but related beliefs.  The first belief is that prayer 'works' and that our meditations and/or petitions to God can affect the material world and can change our individual and collective lives.  The second conviction is that peace is worthy of the effort of prayer, that peace should be a goal for each person, and not to rest on the more realist (cynical) view that war and conflict are inevitable.  

Today is the International Day of Prayer for Peace and it is a day of hope mixed with...desperation.  Prayer becomes most urgent  in moments when we don't know where else to turn both in our personal lives and, as in the case with this day of peace, in our world. I am involved with an organization called Fellowship in Prayer that was founded 60 years as a response to the urgent crisis posed by the atom bomb which held (and still holds) the possibility of destroying all life on the planet.  Fellowship in Prayer called upon people of goodwill, across all religious traditions, 'East and West,' to come together to pray for peace.  For the last sixty years people in Fellowship in Prayer have been praying for peace, and one could say successfully, as the world has so far avoided nuclear destruction.  Yet given the seemingly intractable conflicts that continue around the world, the need for prayer, and those dedicated to prayer, seems  greater today than ever before.  

On this day many groups from across the religious spectrum are praying for Peace. And even if it is not easy, you too should pray for peace today and every day. Praying for Peace means you are making a spiritual statement that yes, what I do with my spiritual practice matters, that my meditations can change myself, but also have the power to change the world.  Or for me, as a Christian, praying for peace is a faith statement that God does hear our prayers in the hour of our deepest need, that God has a hand in this world, that God can change me, and that God can transform the world - and that God wants peace.  

Praying for peace is one of the most faithful acts one can make.  Jesus said, that those who make and pray for peace will be called the Children of God.  Even if it is not easy - pray for peace!

Here is a prayer that I wrote for those working in International Relations and Statecraft.  It was included in the book Prayers for the New Social Awakening.  And below that you will see the original advertisement for the Fellowship in Prayer from 1949. 

A Prayer for Those Working in International Relations and Statecraft

Sovereign Lord,

We pray for the people who are charged with safeguarding our nation as they bridge culture, race and religion to painstakingly negotiate terms of trade and forge alliances of security.  May they view their task as sacred and be filled with hope, creativity and endurance as they develop bonds among nations that are mutually beneficial and will produce lasting peace and respect among all peoples. Lord, help our leaders to look beyond grand palaces and corporate offices to carefully consider the effects that the policies they are creating will have upon the humble homes of the average citizen around the world.  May America be girded by the spirit of cooperation and generosity that recognizes the needs of others alongside our own so that the entire world might enjoy a common wealth of food, drink, shelter, education and recreation

Lord, may America not succumb to the sin of imperial temptation, rather tether us to our religious commitment of servanthood.  May we use our power in concert with the international community so that we might collectively bring in a new era marked by justice and peace.  Let restraint and compassion stay the cruel hand of war that slays the young and leaves societies broken and bloody.  May cool minds prevail in seasons hot with destructive cycles of revenge.  In combating the evils of this day let us not become what we despise.  Rather hold us fast to our conviction that living without intimidation or deprivation is a human right in our own country as well in others.

God of the Universe, may we forsake the hubris of claiming you as our private possession, but rather may you claim us as we work for reconciliation and the common good.   Lord, may none use religion as a rallying call for national militarism, territorial expansion or terror based on dangerous readings of sacred texts. Rather let us recognize the sacred in other human beings from every nation, class, race or religion.  Help us to love both you and our neighbor and thereby fulfilling the great commandment of your Son Jesus Christ, so that through our efforts for peace we might be known as your children. 

May America and the entire world be blessed by your continued providence in our time and for generations in the future.  May Thy kingdom come, thy will be done throughout the earth as it is in heaven. Amen.

Fellowship in Prayer's Original New York Times Ad in December 12, 1949

OUR CALL TO PRAYER


PRAYER

an answer to

"GOD and the ATOM"

The Ferris Booth advertisement in THE NEW YORK TIMES on October third calling upon President Truman to start a "spiritual renaissance" is commendable and sound thinking, generally. However, the final responsibility falls upon each individual who believes in God, regardless of his religious affiliation. The President has called upon all people to take a greater interest in the religious life of each community. Can we expect more?

PRAYER IS THE ANSWER:--

The real strength and power of religion can only be exerted through invoking the presence of God in our lives and praying earnestly for the realization of the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man toward the consummation of a better understanding in international and human relations. A believer in any faith can do this, as prayer is the means of communication with God in all of the great religions of the world. Prayer for good by believers in God can overcome the oppressors and put to flight the foes of righteousness.

IT IS ATTAINABLE:--

As individuals, we conduct business together, we mingle in social life, in sports there are no barriers. Surely we are not so biased that we fail to see the common attributes in other religions. TRUTH, HONESTY, JUSTICE, MERCY are basic elements in every great faith. In seeking God, let us omit the controversial issues. IF WE WILL TO DO IT--IT CAN BE DONE.

HOW?--

Begin now to pray in your own manner for the things set forth above. Do it frequently or at stated times. Talk it over with your family, your neighbors, your friends, your spiritual adviser. If possible, get your local newspaper to copy this article or comment upon it. Fellowship Circles could be formed. Do not, however, let it interfere with your regular religious duties--rather combine it with them. Our united prayers

Friday September 18, 2009

A Choice for Catholic Bishops: Confrontation or Engagement?

John Gehring is Media Director and Senior Writer for Catholics in Alliance for the Common GoodCatholic progressives are not the only faithful worried about the dangers posed by some U.S. church leaders turning away from civil engagement in the...

Wednesday September 16, 2009

TIME Magazine Story Highlights Moral Crisis in Vieques

By: Eric Sapp
What would you do if you found out that people in your neighborhood had a 30% higher cancer rate, 25% higher infant mortality rate, and 95% higher cirrhosis of the liver rate than the surrounding area?  Then you found out...

Wednesday September 16, 2009

Categories: Race

Jimmy Carter Calls it Racism

I have been noticing a racial tinge to the health care reform protests.  But after seeing the sea of angry white faces holding signs with Obama as an African Witch Doctor, and other signs commenting about his Muslim heritage, I...

Monday September 14, 2009

Categories: Economy

Thanks Glenn Beck - This 'Socialism' Sounds Great!

It's been 20 years since the Berlin wall fell and the Soviet Union officially collapsed. And it has been about that amount of time since socialism served as a buzz word in American political life. Now, thanks to Glenn Beck,...

Thursday September 10, 2009

Categories: Health Care, Media

Building on the Hopeful Aspects of Obama's Health Care Speech and Helping Him Get Beyond His Internal Contradictions

Normal 0 0 1 1557 8876 73 17 10900 11.1282 0 0 0 Media analyses of President Obama's health care speech were divided on whether he had indicated serious support for a public option or had, instead, cleverly tossed...

Thursday September 10, 2009

Categories: Health Care

The Moral "We"

Earlier today, I wondered if the President would return to hope in tonight's health care speech.  He did.  And he did even more. President Obama made the moral case for health care reform by appealing to the best aspects...

Wednesday September 9, 2009

Hope and Healing

I was too young to remember President John F. Kennedy.  My mother worked on his campaign and hauled her baby (me) along with her to pass out literature.  She assures me that one of my first words was "k-e-n-d-y." ...

Tuesday September 8, 2009

Categories: Health Care

REM/Move On - We Can't Wait Health Care Video

In case you didn't see this:...

Tuesday September 8, 2009

Obama's 'Real' Talk to Students (warning, humor involved)

Andy Ostroy over at Huffingtonpost discovered the 'real' text of President Obama's talk to students.  The White House on Monday released the text of President Barack Obama's highly controversial speech to the nation's school children Tuesday. As expected and feared...

Sunday September 6, 2009

Labor Day Prayers

On this Labor Day try something different - pray for rights and justice for all who work and the dignity and the success of all who are seeking work.  Creating God, You made the heavens and the earth and your work was Good...

Friday September 4, 2009

US Torture Programs - Obama's Mixed Progress (by George Hunsinger)

George Hunsinger teaches at Princeton Theological Seminary.  He is the Founder of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (http://www.nrcat.org).   Since the signing of the Executive Orders in January 2009, the record of the new administration on torture has...

Friday September 4, 2009

Categories: Catholics

Conservative Cafeteria Catholics

I found this article over at Religion Dispatches about how conservatives Catholics are cafeteria Catholics in their own way: "Cafeteria Catholics" is a term often used by conservatives to describe members of the church who are not in alignment with Church teaching...

Wednesday September 2, 2009

The MBA Oath and Morally Mature Capitalism

In this time of questioning the moral compass of the business community it is nice to see that some students have signed a self imposed a moral code for students in MBA programs.  This summer I spoke at the...

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.