Progressive Revival

Recently in Death Penalty Category

Wednesday November 11, 2009

Categories: Christians, Death Penalty

John Allen Muhammad: Murderer and Murdered

As the nation observed the killing of John Muhammad last night (Live with Larry King!) I gathered with a small group of students, seminarians, and a Roman Catholic Priest to meet Rev. Caroll Pickett, who was the chaplain for prisoners about to be executed in Texas.  We watched the documentary At the Death House Door


After his ministry of being present with 95 inmates in the last day and moments of life, Rev. Carroll Picket has come out against the death penalty.  Rev. Pickett is no softy.  When he started this work he was for the death penalty.  Hs own grandfather was murdered, and while he was still serving as the pastor of a church two members of his congregation were taken hostage and murdered at the same prison where he would eventually serve as chaplain at the death house.  His views changed over time, and last night he emphatically said that everyone can change, everyone can be redeemed - that includes the inmates, but also himself. 

Rev. Pickett's reason to be against the death penalty are varied.  One important one is that he believes that some of the men killed are actually innocent and that the death penalty leads to the miscarriage of justice which cannot be taken back if new evidence is uncovered.  Another reason is that it doesn't solve anything, that the death penalty offers no closure for the families of the victims.  Another reason is that it doesn't work as a deterrent.   Finally, Rev. Pickett just doesn't believe that killing is right ever.  Pickett is no liberal and he doesn't have a lenient bone in his body - he wants people locked up for life with no possibility of parole in solitary confinement.  In his view (and he has seen it) this is a far more threatening and feared penalty among the criminally minded than death.  

Rev. Pickett ended his talk with asking us the question: Do you know what it says on the cause of death for those executed by the state?  Death by murder.   John Muhammed deserved to have life in prison, in solitary confinement, without the possibility of parole.  Instead, last night while the nation watched, he was murdered. 

Monday January 5, 2009

Tim Kaine and the DNC's Faith Initiative

Obama's pick of Tim Kaine for the DNC Chair means a continuation or expansion of the DNC's Faith Outreach.  Dan Gilgoff explains on his blog God and Country

"Barack Obama's decision to tap Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine to be the next Democratic National Committee chairman is a sign that the party will very likely continue and perhaps expand on the unprecedented faith outreach initiatives that Howard Dean launched during his tenure as chair.

Kaine's 2005 run for governor was one of the few statewide races in the year following the Democrats' landslide defeat among so-called values voters, and his bid became a test case for many of the faith-based tactics that have now become commonplace among Democrats."  more on Tim Kaine and faith

It will be interesting to see what this means for the debate in the DNC on personal morality issues.  Will the faith initiatives be pitted against pro-choice, gay rights and women's groups?  This doesn't have to happen, but it might. 

Hopefully religious pro-choice groups and religious pro-LGBT rights groups will sit at the table along side pro-life groups. to talk about a "common good" strategy.   It seems as though the Obama campaign walked the fine line and succeeded.  Yet I remember at the faith caucuses in Denver where there didn't seem to be many representatives from the pro-choice wing of the party present and gay people weren't mentioned at all.

Saturday August 23, 2008

Joe Biden and the Catholic Challenge

By choosing the longtime senator insider and foreign policy expert, Joe Biden, as his running mate, Barack Obama got a well-respected congressional insider to help his prospective legislative agenda as well as sharp-spoken (too much, at times--but good for a veep) campaigner and an opponent of Bush's foreign policy whose own son is set to be deployed to Iraq. That's a strong combo.

But with Biden, Obama is also gambling that having a Catholic on the ticket will draw in some of the fence-sitting Catholics whose votes will be key to success in November. Peeling away a few evangelical votes, or hoping for a low turnout by the Christian right, is a prayer. As I wrote here, the white, suburban evangelicals who are the bedrock of the GOP election strategy may respect Obama, at best. But he's not a member of the tribe, despite his thoroughgoing Christian bona fides, and it seems nothing will convince them otherwise.

Biden, however, is a strong bet in that he could--and should--play well with many Catholics. From abortion to his working-class background, he represents a viewpoint and a culture that resonate with the broad middle of Catholic opinion that finds the assertions of authoritative political opinion from right and left in the church highly dubious.

Consider Biden's abortion record, as set out here and here. Biden supports Roe v. Wade but backed a federal ban on late-term abortions and opposes public funding of abortion. His record is mixed, which was enough to earn him a NARAL rating (currently at 60 percent) as low as 36 percent in recent years--and NARAL pointedly has not endorsed Biden.  

Moreover, Biden's compelling personal history--from his hardscrabble upbringing in a Catholic family (he breifly considered becoming a priest, as many Catholic boys of that era did) to the tragedy that claimed his wife and daugther, as well as his own near-death experience--have given him a broad perspective on life and a passionate commitment to fighting injustice. Much of his views, in fact, are grounded in Catholic social justice principles, which Obama seems to share intuitively. But Biden can speak to them much more cogently--and perhaps make up for his penchant for shooting from the lip.

 

A primary source would be this 2007 Christian Science Monitor profile, "A Frank and Abiding Faith," as well as this Pew biography and David Brooks' column from this week, "Hoping it's Biden."  

Will the choice convince any of the knee-jerkers in the McCain camp? Of course not. For too many, ideology and party loyalty trump deliberation and introspection, especially at this point in the campaign. You can already see the silly ads and dumb commentary all over the Web. Will the selection tip the "average voter"? Not so much. A Washington Post poll shows that three-quarters of voters said picking Biden would not sway their votes one way or the other. And about as many said they would be more apt to support Obama with Biden on the ticket as said the choice would make them less likely to vote Democratic on Election Day (13 to 10 percent).

But Biden's Catholic, working-class roots, especially in a key region like Scranton in a "keystone" state like Pennsylvania could play well not just there, but in other similar regions in other battleground states, as well as with Catholics as a whole--the true swing vote.

The risky part of Obama's gamble on Biden is that by picking a Catholic--and it wouldn't matter who--he risks reigniting the "wafer wars" (an unfortunately commonplace phrase which--this is an update of earlier posting--I'll refrain from promoting further on advice of good counsel) that divide the faithful even more than they are. Given Biden's background and record, however, the Wafer Warriors will have to go some ways to dirty up Biden on the faith issue. As the Pew bio has it:

When the Diocese of Wilmington's bishop, Michael Saltarelli, came under pressure in 2004 and 2005 to deny communion to Biden and other Catholic politicians who support abortion rights, the bishop refused, saying through a diocesan spokesman that he "prefers prayer and active engagement" with politicians who take positions contrary to church doctrine; Biden refused to comment on the issue. Once again running for president, Biden said in April 2007 that his party must demonstrate it is "not afraid to deal with the faith issue."

On the other hand, Saltarelli's replacement, Bishop W. Francis Malooly, takes office on Sept 8, and his approach to Biden is unknown. Would he want to start his own term by courting such controversy? Most bishops--and Malooly is considered a deliberate fellow--would want to get to know one of their flock before making any drastic public moves, and that may be tough given Biden's coming campaign agenda.

Still, it'll be telling to see what blasts come at Biden from the usual Catholic suspects--and whether they will backfire in a way that would earn Obama-Biden more support than the ticket would have otherwise.  

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Progressive Revival

Diana Butler Bass and Paul Raushenbush both stand firmly within the Mainline Protestant tradition and, along with guest bloggers of all religious backgrounds are dedicated to the revival of religious progressivism and its influence in American politics.

Contributors

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass is a commentator and scholar in American religion. She is the author of seven books including A People's History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (HarperOne, 2009).
» Posts by Diana Butler Bass
Paul Raushenbush
Moderator of the Progressive Revival blog and the Associate Dean of Religious Life at Princeton University.
» Posts by Paul Raushenbush
More »

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Progressive Revival

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.