They are finally admitting defeat. One thing the article doesn’t mention is the fact that since the surge appears to be working the left really doesn’t have much leverage. They can’t say that we are in the middle of a civil war or that the Iraqis aren’t working on political solutions. All their talking points have come to naught.
After a series of legislative defeats in 2007 that saw the year end with more U.S. troops in Iraq than when it began, a coalition of anti-war groups is backing away from its multimillion-dollar drive to cut funding for the war and force Congress to pass timelines for bringing U.S. troops home.
In recognition of hard political reality, the groups instead will lower their sights and push for legislation to prevent President Bush from entering into a long-term agreement with the Iraqi government that could keep significant numbers of troops in Iraq for years to come.
The groups believe this switch in strategy can draw contrasts with Republicans that will help Democrats gain ground in November and bring the votes to pass more dramatic measures. But it is a long way from the early months of 2007, when Democrats were freshly in power and momentum for a dramatic shift in Iraq policy seemed overpowering.
“There was a consensus that last year was not productive,” John Isaacs, executive director of Council for a Livable World, said of a meeting attended by a coalition of anti-war groups last week. “Our expectations were dashed.”
The meeting, held at an office on K Street, was attended by around 20 representatives of influential anti-war groups, including MoveOn.org and Americans Against Escalation in Iraq, which spent $12 million last year opposing the war.
Isaacs said he thought the meeting would be a difficult one, with an adamant faction pressing for continued focus on timelines and funding. It wasn’t to be.
“We got our heads together and decided to go a different way,” Isaacs said. “The consensus was not to keep beating our heads against the wall trying to block every funding bill — not because we don’t agree with it, but because we don’t have the votes.”
It took them long enough to figure that out, didn’t it? Not the quickest wits.
posted January 17, 2008 at 10:14 am
Anti-War apathists were never fighting against “war” in the first place. They were still marching for orgy rights of the graying hippy-to-liberal-to-progressive movement that perpetutaes the lascivious licentiousness of the 60′s generation on to this current lost generation. If they were truly against war, they would be protesting in every Islamic country on this planet. Instead they sip on latte and hold hands walking down comfy city streets.
posted January 17, 2008 at 11:43 am
Well, all facets of the left are American centered as far as I can tell.