Wow! The lefties have turned on Wright big time! Ed Morrissey has some quotes. Some believe this will hurt Obama and want him to disown him. Even Andrew Sullivan thinks that Obama should disown Wright:
I can well understand why Obama has not disowned the man who helped bring him to Christ. God knows I have had some spiritual mentors whose views I cannot accept in their entirety or some allies in the struggle for gay equality who are not my ideological confreres in many other ways. I have been in a movement where many others – most others – hold views very alien to my own. Obama is a decent human being, and cutting off someone who has nurtured and sustained his faith and been a father figure to him is not in his character. If I believed for one second that Obama shared any of this bile, I couldn’t begin to support him. But Wright’s cooptation of Obama for his own agenda – his assertion that Obama’s distancing from him is insincere – requires, in fact demands a response from Obama.
Obama needs not just to distance himself from Wright’s views; he needs to disown him at this point. Wright himself, it seems to me, has become part of what Obama is fighting against: the boomer, Vietnam era’s obsession with its red-blue, white-black, pro and anti-America fixations. That is not what this election needs to be about; and Wright’s massive, racially divisive and, yes, bitter provocation requires a proportionate response.
We need a speech or statement from Obama in which he utterly repudiates this poison, however personally difficult that may be, however damaging the impact will be. The statement today will not do it. This is no longer about cynics trying to associate one man’s politics with another. It is now about Wright attempting to associate himself and some of his noxious, stupid, rancid views with the likely Democratic nominee. Wright has given Obama no choice – and he has also given him another opportunity. He needs to seize it.
BTW, light posting today as I try to finish a digest this week.



posted April 29, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I honestly don’t think that anything Obama can say or do can sufficiently distance himself from Wright. After all, what is to prevent them from making up if Obama is elected and then we have the marvelous specter of the Rev. Mr. Wright being the president’s spiritual advisor, mentor, counsellor and foreign policy advisor?
posted April 29, 2008 at 2:26 pm
Since a Hillary supporter actually got Wright to the National Press Club, isn’t Wright really a surrogate for Hillary? A lot of what I’ve heard takes the angle that Barack Obama is a boy who has no brain of his own and does everything his daddy tells him. Well, if this Clinton-hosted media circus proves anything, it’s that Obama was done with all this mess quite some time ago. There are too many OLD MINDS (Joan Walsh comes to mind) who feel everyone you’re associated with defines you in a narrow dimension. Whether one agrees with them or not. People who live at all know you have friends who do not agree with you, and who have done things you cannot condone. Did people renounce or denounce or wash off the cooties from friendships with Gingrich (divorced wife on deathbed) or Billy Graham (http://www.rense.com/general20/billy.htm “Graham mentions that he has friends in the media who are Jewish, saying they “swarm around me and are friendly to me.” But, he confides to Nixon, “They don’t know how I really feel about what they’re doing to this country.”) ( http://www.beliefnet.com/story/102/story_10213.html “As a biographer of Billy Graham, I found his association with Nixon to be the most troubling and disappointing of his long and generally admirable career. And nearly 20 years after Watergate, one of Graham’s close associates confided that, “for the life of me, I honestly believe that after all these years, Billy still has no idea of how badly Nixon snookered him.”) (“At that, Nixon talked for several minutes about Jewish domination of the media, asking rhetorically, “Now what does this mean? Does it mean that all the Jews are bad? No. But it does mean that most Jews are left-wing. Particularly the younger ones are like that, way out. They’re radical. They’re ‘peace at any price’ except where support for Israel is concerned. The best Jews are actually the Israeli Jews.”) Yet anti-semitism is not in the way we think of Nixon or Graham. Double-standard treatment like this is part of why all this recent attention on Jeremiah Wright – versus or and – Barack Obama sounds like a media wishing to control both men, and finding itself, well, outfoxed and out of touch.
posted April 29, 2008 at 3:14 pm
“This is no longer about cynics trying to associate one man’s politics with another.”
Of course it is. You cynics have simply not clue #1. Wright is not running for the Presidency. This All God All The Time nonsense has grown more thn tiresome. Over on the God-o-rama (or is it God-a-palooza, or God-a-licious, whatever) blog, poor Dan Gilgoff has averaged 1.2 responses per Wright post over the last 3 weeks. It is beyond yawn-making – it is irrelevant. (Heck, gilgoff even had to write a blog to convince people (all 1.2 of ‘em) that Wright matters. I, for one, am NOT convinced.
Why do you not get it – no one gives a damn about Wright. We would much rather her about candidates’ policies than their pastors. (For that matter, who here could even NAME Clinton’s pastor or McCain’s pastor, let alone the subject of their sermons???)
posted April 29, 2008 at 3:16 pm
“then we have the marvelous specter of the Rev. Mr. Wright being the president’s spiritual advisor, mentor, counsellor and foreign policy advisor?”
Would you rather have John Hagee as “spiritual advisor” to the President? Or Hillary’s pastor – you know, what’s his name. (I haven’t a clue what his name is, or even if it’s a “he”. How come that in this spirit-filled Godelection? Selective much?
posted April 29, 2008 at 3:51 pm
“You cynics have simply not clue #1. Wright is not running for the Presidency.”
This is a rather stupid comment, of course we know that. But you can’t run as a candidate of hope and change and then be part of a racist and divisive church for 20 years. The two don’t add up. And obviously Obama realizes that and has finally distanced himself from the pastor.
You may not get it but your candidate got it. It’s a good thing for him that he’s more politically savvy than you.
posted April 29, 2008 at 6:22 pm
By November Mr. Wright will be lining the kitty litter box & anyone who tries to revive this ludicrous topic will be pelted with the clumps.
AND Obama will be our next president. It’s a slam dunk!
http://tarheelblue.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/042908aab.html
(Obama shoots hoops with the Tar Heels. Word has it he nearly scored over Player of the Year Tyler Hansborough. Guess that puts his bowling score into perspective. Personally, I like his de-fense.)
posted April 29, 2008 at 11:55 pm
I agree trying to rehash Rev Wright does not put food on American tables. Rhetoric during a recession will back fire on the culprits.
posted April 30, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Let’s see.. the shelter I work in is being closed due to all the cutbacks, they can no longer (let’s see if I can remember the line) ‘serve the homeless and disabled’ in the community.
Hamburger here is up to 4 bucks a pound, eggs to over 2 dollars a dozen, milk is over 4 dollars a gallon. (More expensive than gas!) And there’s a chance in hell they’ll manage to sell the buildings that used to be the shelter in this housing market.
Jobs are down, businesses are closing, rent and utilities still have to be paid and prices for daily necessities go up daily.
And we are supposed to care about a few inflammatory sermons some candidate might’ve sat through several years ago that aren’t any worse in theme or language than what I can hear from tv political pundits or tv preachers any day of the week.
I’ll see if I can muster any ‘give a cr@p’ for this issue.
posted May 1, 2008 at 2:08 pm
karen, thanks for helping everyone keep perspective. some around here think the solutions to our world problems are held up with lapel pins.