Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Obama’s elitist comment made into a Clinton campaign ad

posted by Susan Johnson | 8:04pm Monday April 14, 2008

She didn’t waste any time, did she? The ad just writes itself, doesn’t it? And what’s so great about this is that McCain doesn’t even have to spend a dime of his own money running it :-) As Allahpundit calls it, “The Bittergate” attack ad:



Previous Posts

One Final Word
My dear friend Michele slipped into eternity on Wednesday, February 1.   She was a remarkable woman who left a legacy of faith, determination, and love. For three years she courageously battled the ovarian cancer that eventually robbed her of her life.  A few days before she died, one of her docto

posted 8:43:41pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated
My husband told me that there are rumors that I've died. I'm happy to report that I'm still very much alive. My cancer has gone to stage four but we are controlling it with chemo, the cancer numbers are currently in the normal range. I've stopped blogging to concentrate on my daughters and writing a

posted 7:07:55pm Aug. 23, 2010 | read full post »

An update and a prayer request
Several people have asked about Michele's condition, and have promised to pray for her. On her behalf, I thank you for that. I spoke with her a little while ago, and she asked that I come here and tell you what's going on, and to ask you to pray for her. She isn't able to post here herself right

posted 4:55:36pm Apr. 06, 2010 | read full post »

Rest in peace, Internet Monk.
A man known in the cyber world as The Internet Monk, has died. Michael Spencer lost his battle with cancer tonight. My prayers go out for his family and for all those who loved and will miss him. :(

posted 11:52:00pm Apr. 05, 2010 | read full post »

The peace that passes all understanding, pt. 1
I'm coming out of my normal hiding place to make a few comments. The internet is a strange place. It is often a wonderful place, a helpful place, a unifying place. But it is also alienating, cold, and is the perfect medium in which to depersonalize others. Through it, I have seen people reach out

posted 4:39:08pm Mar. 25, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(16)
post a comment
anonymous reincarnate

posted April 14, 2008 at 11:29 pm


gosh, what has mcinsane been doing lately? any leadership? nope. nothing. just more of the bush mcsame.
did he bother to meet his rivals in the last open debate about faith? what’s he afraid of? himself?



report abuse
 

RG

posted April 15, 2008 at 12:55 am


What is sad here is that this whole debate is over a caricature of what Obama said. He said that people have been promised in rural America for so long that things would get better, and they haven’t . So they cling to their family , faith, and issues like guns and gays, because they don’t believe the government can make any difference in their lives.
Our policies have not helped people recently. If we spent more here on infrastucture and moving to more renewable energy, there would be more jobs all over the country. But instead we make the military industrial complex and the oil companies happy. Trickle down doesn’t work; percolate up does, but it’s not what this administration believes in. This country is headed for big trouble, unless we change that. And maybe even then.



report abuse
 

anonymous reincarnate

posted April 15, 2008 at 3:46 am


it’s because that’s the worst they can dig up. opponents and right-wing bloggers don’t want to discuss obama’s position on issues simply because they know that the majority of people agree with obama (and clinton for that matter). they’d be doing democrats a favor.
it really doesn’t matter which democrat got the label, the leader was destined to get it. it’s straight out of the republican play book. pure rovian distraction technique that we’ve become so used to seeing from the right.



report abuse
 

meh

posted April 15, 2008 at 8:13 am


A statement from the Rude Pundit (rudepundit dot blogspot dot com – careful… he has a potty mouth and a brilliant mind: two things that make righties’ heads explode):
Clinton’s and McCain’s statements attacking Obama are not just disingenuous, but they are, in fact, the elitist wishful thinking of the privileged class. They want to homogenize the anger, they want to whitewash away the very real differences of class, and they cry the plaintive cry of every wealthy liberal who ever gave money to support a union: “We’re all in this together.” That’s a BS belief. (And Clinton, who has worked really hard for the working class people of New York, … knows better than to say the [stuff] she’s spouting.)
Obama wasn’t looking down on anyone or disrespecting the workers of America. He was acknowledging something real about small towns where the factories have closed, where the economic centers have been shuttered, and where the people have been told that a tax cut for millionaires is what’s going to get them their jobs and economic security back. Obama’s giving those people voice and agency: when you are disempowered, you seek other means to have power, whether it’s through the gun or through the disempowering of others, or through the comfort of faith, which promises you oodles in heaven for your sufferings on earth.

Amen and amen and amen again.



report abuse
 

recovering ex-Pentecostal

posted April 15, 2008 at 11:03 am


Tell us, Michele, should Obama make hay out of the G.O.P.er who referred to Obama as “that boy” (see elsewhere in B’net today for complete story)???
Sometimes people use unfortunate words to describe a veritable truth. That would be the case for Obama at least. And in the G.O.P.er’s case, the truth is that racist ‘boy’ attitudes still abound in America in general and in the G.O.P. in specific.
I think the sheer length of the election campaign is absurd – what, over 18 months long? Of course every human being is going to let slip a word or two here and there that they will eventually regret. But the nonstop blog/haranguing is overmuch. Some Americans ARE bitter. And rightfuly so, imnsho.



report abuse
 

meh

posted April 15, 2008 at 11:21 am


I think the one thing we’ve learned though all these various brouhahas is:
Average Americans do not deserve to be spoken to like adults. If they want to act like foot-stomping two-year-olds, they deserve to be treated as such by the mollycoddling ego-stroking do-nothings they elect.
I’m lucky – I’ll die in 30-40 years, and I’m not planning on breeding. Your children and grandchildren will have to live with the legacy of this nonsense.
Good luck with that.



report abuse
 

Charles Cosimano

posted April 15, 2008 at 12:14 pm


I love watching the obamanites trying to talk their way of this. The voters know what he was thinking.



report abuse
 

ZZ

posted April 15, 2008 at 12:58 pm


“should Obama make hay out of the G.O.P.er who referred to Obama as “that boy”
Obama made HUGE hay out of that through his campaign manager. Everyone around him plays the race card constantly. Now there’s a whole list of harmless words we can’t use, and positions we can’t take, because we’ll just get the R-bomb dropped on us. It’s laziest, worst kind of negative campaigning.
And BTW, “boy” legitimately referred to his age. And it’s much less of a attack than calling somebody a gun-toting zenophobic Jesus freak.



report abuse
 

meh

posted April 15, 2008 at 1:04 pm


I love watching the obamanites trying to talk their way of this. The voters know what he was thinking.
C’mon, Chuck – half the voters don’t even know what *they’re* thinking.



report abuse
 

meh

posted April 15, 2008 at 1:08 pm


BTW – at mid 40s, I think “man” is a more accurate descriptor.
Of course, for folks like ZZ who see no problem calling a grown black man “boy,” in full knowledge of the way that term was used to subjugate, it’s perfectly okay. Apparently, white people, especially the moneyed, white variety, love to think of the world as having no past, (and preferably no future).
And it’s much less of a attack than calling somebody a gun-toting zenophobic Jesus freak.

Gosh – it’s a good thing no one has said that (except you, you Xenophobic, gun-toting, Jesus freak.)



report abuse
 

RJohnson

posted April 15, 2008 at 1:59 pm


My father was raised in that region of Kentucky. I have numerous relatives down there.
They all know what a boy is.



report abuse
 

yelladawgNC

posted April 15, 2008 at 11:40 pm


The voters do seem to know what he was thinking; that’s why he’s surging in Indiana and holding steady in PA.
It’s absurd to accuse Obama of being elitist, particularly if the people making the accusations have an income of over a million dollars in one instance and in the other, is the son and grandson of rear admirals. Obama could have made millions himself when he graduated from law school but he chose instead to work as a community organizer in Chicago with laid-off steelworkers, going to meetings in church basements. Yeah, he’s a real elitist. What a bunch of hooey. It’s as phony as Cindy McCain’s “home” recipes.



report abuse
 

yelladawgNC

posted April 15, 2008 at 11:49 pm


Somebody should have taken her six-shooter away:
“Hillary Kills All Voters in Remaining Primary States”
http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/hillary-080402



report abuse
 

yelladawgNC

posted April 16, 2008 at 12:05 am


For anyone who isn’t already thoroughly sick of this whole debate, here’s a link to a good article about what Obama REALLY said about Pa., from someone who was at that fundraiser:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-coleman/i-was-there-what-obama-re_b_96553.html



report abuse
 

anonymous reincarnate

posted April 16, 2008 at 2:04 am


yup – after 3 solid days of slinging around the “elitist” label, barack has lost very little ground in pennsylvania.



report abuse
 

Michele McGinty

posted April 16, 2008 at 11:46 am


“Tell us, Michele, should Obama make hay out of the G.O.P.er who referred to Obama as “that boy” (see elsewhere in B’net today for complete story)???”
Are you asking from a political perspective or from a let’s get the Republicans perspective?
I ask because if I were him I wouldn’t want to jump on every racist remark that is made so I wouldn’t give Clinton an opening to bring up race again.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.