
Friday May 16, 2008
Category: PoliticsThe Real McCain/Rubin Interview
Lefties, this will teach you guys not to believe the MSM. Here's the video proof:
Of course this won't stop you from continuing to spread the lies about McCain the way you do about his "100 year" Iraq comment.
Filed Under: casting stones, Democrats, Obama, presidential election

Subscribe
RSS Feed
About Reformed Chicks Blabbing
Read more about the Reformed Chicks: Michele McGinty, Angela Arnold, and Susan Johnson
Recent Posts
- CNN Poll: "A growing number of Clinton supporters polled say they may stay home in November"
- Wesley Clark off the VP list?
- Two boys were disciplined for not praying to Allah
- Knife crime has replaced terrorism as priority in London
- Happy Independence Day!
- Don't call white people "honkies" in England...
- Is Obama flip-flopping on flip-flopping on Iraq?
- Is Wall-E left-wing propaganda?
- "Wanted"
- Is the Christian right ready to unite behind McCain?
Resources
- Westminster Theological Seminary
- WTS Bookstore
- Casting Stones
- Christian Blogosphere
- Monergism.com
- reformation21 blog
- evangelical outpost
- Dr Jim West
- Green Baggins
- Between Two Worlds
- once more with feeling
- The Boar's Head Tavern
- Think Christian
- ScrappleFace
- Breitbart.com
- News Busters
- The Brody File
- Hugh Hewitt
- Hot Air
- Fred Thompson Links
- Fishwrap
- Righ Wing News
- RealClearPolitics
- Instapundit.com
- RedState
- MorgueFile
- Tail Rank
- Doorkeeper's Delight




Add to Newsvine



Comments
"You appreciate the futility of Christ's words in that passage? "Woe" and, later, "how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?" The implication being that they won't.
You apply these words of Christ to those who comment here ... and that's love?"
No, I was using it as an example of hitting people in the face with their self-righteousness and hypocrisy. Not all the implications of the passage.
Posted by: Michele McGinty | May 18, 2008 5:13 PM
"Then this is a good time for you to exemplify turning the other cheek."
What makes you think I haven't done that?"
"it is in your posts, your language"
I suggest that you feel that way because you don't agree with me. When I read eople rail against Bush and attack him, I view them as harsh even though they are just expressing their opinion as I do.
"If you have children, does an "everyone else does it" argument work for them?"
I wasn't giving you an everyone does it argument, I was giving you a biblical one. I suggest you read Proverbs to understand what I'm saying when I say that I'm responding in kind.
Posted by: Michele McGinty | May 18, 2008 5:23 PM
"then perhaps you, as a beautiful christian and saint, and truly open-minded independent thinking intellectual could explain it to this despicable christian and sinner, and partisan liberal hack."
I never said that I was a beautiful Christian and saint. In fact, I'm not really much of a Christian. But I know one thing, I'm tired of this and won't be responding anymore to this thread. If you can't see, what everyone has agreed (even Lou Dobbs) was an omission to make McCain appear to support unconditional negotiation with Hamas, then that's up to you. Go in peace, my child.
Posted by: Michele McGinty | May 18, 2008 5:29 PM
No, I was using it as an example of hitting people in the face with their self-righteousness and hypocrisy.
Yes, I got it. Thanks.
Posted by: Moonshadow | May 18, 2008 6:20 PM
oooh, this is about "unconditional"
who ever made the claim that mccain (or obama for that matter) supported unconditional negotiation with hamas? i never did. i don't believe that obama ever did. so what's the debate about here?
do we get to discuss how despicable it is for mccain to attack obama because moderates of hamas would like to see a diplomat (obama) as president instead of bush or mccain?
Posted by: anonymous reincarnate | May 20, 2008 2:44 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?