Obama's McCain victory ad

Hitler was elected.

Bush was (sort of) elected.

McCain can be elected too.

It's a call to decent Americans to keep flipping morons like yourself from taking over the country.

If McCain is elected, you can be certain, it is the last national election we'll ever be allowed.

What a petty point to make. The Obama campaign is only inducing the idea of how it would be like with John McCain -- isn't this what they're supposed to do, create a distinction between the two possible realities and how they're candidacy differs from others?
It does not employ Republican tactics of recent, i.e. condition the audience with the idea of War/Terror/National Security or anything that could involve imminent danger. It'd have been very fair for you to point this out had this been the case, as seen previously with the Clinton campaign.

"Ah yes, the LEFTY LIB MARXIST'S first resort..." - Guy

Lefty Libs, Operation Desperation, and Obamanation are all name calling similar to the Hitler comment, and thanks to EG for that brainfart. But the point is you're only calling EG on something you did previously. Total kettle-calling-pot hypocrisy on your part. Myself, I have no problem with the occasional insult or verbal smackdown, as long as its backed up by substantial arguments and done tastefully. So allow me to demonstrate.

First I'll point out that all your initial comments supporting McCain only talked about how he was up in the polls. So McCain's numbers look better. That's no reason to vote for him, unless you are a like a sheep and cast your vote based on herd mentality.

So you basically have the same problem that McCain does; you have no substantial arguments

On Economy

McCain is Pro deregulation. Whoops. Nice timing on that one McCain, now that President Moron has nearly caused the second Great Depression, and McCain Let's file that achievement under super huge, right between his 9/11 and Iraq war failures.

Also pro-Oil, pro-tax cuts for rich and pro-wealthy elitists (read 7 houses, 13 cars).

And anti-Union. Go corporate fascism.

On Foreign Policy

Total Neocon, Bush Clone, and wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican party. Supported and continues to support the idiocy in Iraq, likes to joke about bombing countries, and apparently doesn't know if its proper for the President to meet with a NATO ally. Expect more terrorist attacks at home and Bomb bomb Iran-style foreign aggression abroad. Think of it as a circle of violence and military actions supported by Republicans which, of course, help Republicans to sell their fear-pandering rhetoric.

On Social/Cultural Issues

Voted for Patriot Act. Way to sell out the Constitution, Johnnie.

Anti-Choice. Way to be sexist on pathetic religious grounds. Does your religion tell you that brown-skinned people are inferior to you as well? It does if you're LDS.

Anti-renewable energy voting record.

Anti-MLK Day voting record.

Against Federal Anti-Poverty and Health care Programs. Way to sell out the American people to aristocracy, Mr. Mcain.

"8 years of Bush didn't manage to change the constitution."

bush on the constitution: why change it if you can skirt it and why skirt it if you can ignore it?

bush on the constitution: why change it if you can skirt it and why skirt it if you can ignore it?

It's why we don't like Bush.

And frankly, if we slide into a depression, I want a president in office who will support my having the equipment to defend my home and family, rather than one who wants to removed that equipment.

That would be weaponry...the kind that the Constitution allows the American people to have.

This one question (the Constitution): who is more likely to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America?

Who has a record of voting for (and against) the provisions of the 2nd Amendment? The 1st?

How many rumors have we heard about the McCain camp attempting to restrict ads? Speech? Signage?

Which party favors shutting down oppositional discourse (Hush Rush?)

If there was a valid Constitutional candidate, I'd most likely vote that way. But what I have is a choice between McCain and Obama.

Who do I trust more to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States?

It's not Obama.

700 billion dollars is a lot of the peoples money to spend to bail out a bunch of corrupt Bush loan sharks.

uh...who gets the most money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? (HINT: Dodd and Obama).

By looking at the polls as they currently stand, my worries do not relate so much to the two individuals at the head of their respective party's tickets (McCain/Obama) so much as they do the 50% (plus) of Americans who are actually poised to vote a Marxist into office this coming November. That is the truly disturbing scenario which is now facing our beloved country. It tells me that those for whom the "dumbing down of America" has been a high priority over the past half-century have succeeded beyond their wildest expectations. Americans, apparently, now no longer know even the most rudimentary aspects of world history over the past 100+ years. Marxism has shown itself time and again to be an anemic form of Communism ... merely the half-way mark on a nation's path to full-blown, government sponsored communism. For a person - man or woman, male or female, black/white/hispanic or asian, young or old - to walk into the voting booth this November and choose a Marxist (who is so deceptively dishonest that he won't even admit to the nation he's a Socialist!) is somewhat akin to that same person being the first to raise their hand when asked "Who'd like to be beaten about the head and shoulders with a stick until dead?" We would (rightly) conclude the pitiable insanity of such a person. In like manner, willingly (even if unwittingly) voting for a clearly committed socialist in light of the fact that we are a republic (which, by the way, for those of you who've never read our founding documents we were created to be!) is to vote for the slow suicide of our country. Even the proposed "bailout" of our country is an absurdly, wrong-headed move which will effectively (and pragmatically) result in our national government having far more control over its citizens than our Constitution ever meant it to have. Give the government the right to hold taxpayers hostage to federally funded bailouts of private sector economic woes and you are setting the course for at least a full century of socialist welfare and warfare which is far more detrimental both to the individual and the family (as well as the corporate expression of the individual, that is, a "national identity") than any (alleged) oppressive forces in a free-market economy. (*Those of us who know our recent history since WWI know what such a fiscal move will mean to the long-term health of our county!). Voting a Socialist into the highest office of this land will undoubtedly spell the death knell for our country as we've known it. Though you may not realize it now, such a vote will instantaneously and effectively neuter our Constitution (undeniably, the best national charter ever written in the history of the world). If you do not trust my word, then at least trust history --- It takes a full generation (at the VERY least) before the working class under a Socialist regime finally wakes up and "gets it" and realizes that under such a regime there is absolutely NO REASON whatsoever for those who were formerly considered the "upper class" or the "rich" (within a free-market economy) to be creative, to put anything back into the system or (dare I say) to perform ANY hard work AT ALL when such hard work is 'rewarded' with government theft of the fruit of their labors; resulting in the forced re-distribution of wealth to the alleged "have-nots." The former "rich" now become what everyone else under socialism becomes --- the pervasive 'poor.' And there will no longer be anyone left to create the jobs which formerly fueled a competitive, free-market economy. Those (few) who remain relatively wealthy under the new socialist regime will have no need (nor desire) to create anything any longer which could feasibly benefit the society as a whole. The 'poor' majority (who will now comprise the only remaining class within socialism) will simply be forced to fight and kill for the little that remains "on the shelves" ---- the meagre fruit of a socialist economy. This will go on for a generation or two (70, maybe 80 years). Government repression will be without mercy. Death rates will rise. Government sponsored 'healthcare' (if one could even call it that) will be a joke as the nation DOESN'T "hear" (remember, under socialism and communism there will no longer be a truly free press!) about the multitudes who will be dying under socialism's failed health care policies. Under a godless, Socialistic "Obamanation" (which will be the result of a Barack Hussein Obama presidency), my children and grandchildren will suffer the same socio-economic and religious woes which have been endured under all Marxist regimes. PLEASE, America ... wake up before November. It's not yet 11/04 and therefore it's not too late to realize what we're about to do ... TO OURSELVES! Obama is undeniably an "obamanation" in the sight of all those who truly love our country and the freedom for which our brave men and women have fought and died since the Revolution. May God have mercy upon the soul of our nation!

oh boy, sullivan... (another) ((white) fascist) pretending {to love) (his) country by (abusing (parentheses)).

the fact is that there is nothing in obama's platform that will make the rich poor and make the poor rich, by any stretch of the rational mind.

your pathetic and deranged drivel is hardly worth the *YAWN* award, but i did get a good laugh to see that there are true chuckleheads like you still trolling about.

You are right BF, Fascism is a much better option. If you actually "study" American history, Progressives have brought us public education, the end of slavery, the right to unionize,child labor laws,womens, sufferage, civil rights legislation, and oh god, the protection of our elderly from poverty.

Conservatives have brought us Prohibition.