Advertisement
What does he know that we don’t know? If the race is over, why bother?Yeah, I know, “just in case.” BTW, I think it’s creepy that Biden knows what the conversations are at the kitchen tables in Delaware. Funny that none of the conversations is about how high their taxes are or why the heck is the government spending so much money, don’t they know that will lead us into inflation.
|
Previous Posts
One Final Word
posted 8:43:41pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »
The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated
posted 7:07:55pm Aug. 23, 2010 | read full post »
An update and a prayer request
posted 4:55:36pm Apr. 06, 2010 | read full post »
Rest in peace, Internet Monk.
posted 11:52:00pm Apr. 05, 2010 | read full post »
The peace that passes all understanding, pt. 1
posted 4:39:08pm Mar. 25, 2010 | read full post » |
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Inflation is irrelevant to those who have no money. Taxes are not high to those who have no income or property to tax. I don’t think Biden is all-knowing and all-seeing into the kitchens of Delaware, but he’s probably not that far off.
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:07 pm
There are very few people who have “no money”. I believe that if Obama raises taxes on small business (and large businesses) that those businesses will raise their prices to compensate, thus lowering my buying power – and the buying power of those who have less than I do.
My taxes go down, my prices go up – for the middle class, it’s a wash.
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Again, how is a post like this relevant? If I wanted unoriginal political commentary I can turn on fox news.
Yesterday someone proposed that those among us who are so disgusted with the fact that a blog like this is hosted by beliefnet despite a complete lack of theological/religious content should contact people from beliefnet and let them know how we feel. If they want a female or reformed perspective, there are many better and more fair-minded ones out there than Michele. Either the editors of beliefnet are not aware of the content of this blog or their standards have gotten very low.
It appears, though, that Michele has deleted these posts from the comments section of the blog even though they in no way violate Beliefnet’s rules of content. So, in light of that, here again is the contact information which is all public available:
For the pr staff:
pr@beliefnetstaff.com
rebecca.freed@morris-king.com
caren.browning@morris-king.com
And for Steven Waldman, Beliefnet’s editor in chief:
Sdwaldman@beliefnetstaff.com
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Hey Mark, did you know that Beliefnet has a category for blogs that is titled “politics”?
That’s what this blog is listed under.
If it’s so disturbing, don’t read. It’s why I stay away from a couple of leftist blogs.
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:52 pm
this blog’s subtitle says that it is written “from a reformed perspective”
Where’s the reformed perspective?
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Read the link in the side bar.
If it so disturbing to you, don’t read.
posted October 25, 2008 at 12:59 pm
MarkH, Michelle has a legitimate point of view. Think of her blog as a way to keep up with the people you really don’t want to have over for cocktails.
posted October 25, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Where’s the reformed perspective?
It doesn’t exist in Michele’s posts. She never points to it, never mentions it, never gives any context for how any of her mindless postings fit into the Reformed tradition. You’re just supposed to take her word for it because it’s in the blog title.
Oh, and she’s supposedly a seminarian but never mentions theology, or the faith that she’s supposedly studying at all.
The only things presented in this pathetic excuse for a blog are Republican talking points. There’s no mention of the Reformed perspective at all. Pointing to the side links is meaningless if the blogger herself never integrates the Reformed tradition into her posts.
posted October 25, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Funny that none of the conversations is about
I thought it was a simple, heartwarming, wonderful ad and I’m surprised at what you found missing.
posted October 25, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Mark
October 25, 2008 12:52 PM
this blog’s subtitle says that it is written “from a reformed perspective”
Where’s the reformed perspective?
_____________________________________________________
Oh and since your LEFTY LIB mentality decides to YOU there isn’t a Reformed perspective…then it must not exist since YOU decided so…hahahahahahaha! No one is listening to your whiny cries to silence the blog…they are laughing at you and your paranoia.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Next Please!
posted October 25, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Big Guy, the more you hold down that shift key, the more I am impressed by your insight. Another ‘HAHA’ might have actually swayed my vote to the RIGHTY CON column. You’re really knockin’ ‘em down today!
P.S. This blog gets more pathetic by the day. What an utterly weak, pointless attack on a positive ad… for the VP candidate. Pass me the popcorn.
posted October 26, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Gillian
October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
P.S. This blog gets more pathetic by the day. What an utterly weak, pointless attack on a positive ad… for the VP candidate. Pass me the popcorn.
________________________________________________________________________
Hint…hint…leave and watch how much better it gets…hahahahahahahaha!
Next Please!
posted October 27, 2008 at 1:34 am
why would we leave? this carnival freak show is too fun to watch. it’s a sick sort of pleasure that we get watching fascist neocons in total meltdown mode that all they can do is focus their hatred and attack absolutely everything.
posted October 27, 2008 at 1:58 am
GUY…knock it off.