Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Good news for the residents of DC...

Thursday October 9, 2008

Categories: Politics

You will not have to worry about Chinese Muslims who were caught near Tora Bora being let loose in your neighborhood.

A three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has blocked the release of 17 Guantanamo detainees onto United States soil.
If we are going to release them, why not send them back to China and let them deal with them. Anyone want to bet the Chinese are going to take the risk and release them into their general population?

And then there's this:

The government no longer considers the men enemy combatants.
If this is the case why didn't the government hand them over to China?

Advertisement
Comments
Lynn
October 9, 2008 7:46 AM

Here's what Andrew McCarth has to say about it:

"Back in June, I wrote an article here called "Welcome to Boumediene World." The Supreme Court had just decided, in the Boumediene case, to give constitutional habeas corpus rights (i.e., the right to petition the federal civilian courts) to alien enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay; a panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals promptly presumed to reverse the commander-in-chief's determination that the Uighur combatants — ethnic Chinese Muslims who were apprehended training in terrorist camps in Afghanistan — were not enemy combatants. Now the next shoe is about to drop. The Washington Post reports that a federal judge in Washington may be about to order the Uighurs released into the United States — i.e., to dwell freely among our population. This is the very nightmare scenario I warned about. The courts' steps are outrageous, but predictable and inevitable. A lot of the blame here, however, goes to the administration and the military. They have long taken the position that radical Islamic ideology is not the problem, and that we need only worry about actively those taking up arms against the United States. They don't want us to talk about jihad — the better to keep us in the dark about jihadist ideology. Thus, the government rationalizes, the Uighurs are not a threat to us, only to the Chinese. That was all the daylight the judges need to say: OK, then release them in the U.S., since no other country — except China, where they'd be persecuted — will take them. The government's self-defeating argument is preposterous. Jihadists — and there is not question that the Uighurs are jihadists — do not recognize distinctions based on the Westphalia world of nation-states. In their view, it is Dar al Islam or Dar al Harb: i.e., you are either part of the realm of the Muslims or the realm of war, and the goal is to turn Dar al Harb into Dar al Islam by any means necessary. Releasing trained jihadists into the United States on the theory that their beef is with the Chinese and they have no problem with us would be a delusional act of suicide."

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2Q1Y2FiZWQ4MDU0YjYwY2RkMWE2YWFmMDFkYjhjODg=

MH
October 9, 2008 8:43 AM

Michele McGinty : "If this is the case why didn't the government hand them over to China?"

They Uighurs and would likely face persecution if returned to China.

anonymous reincarnate
October 9, 2008 5:44 PM

speaking of tora bora, isn't that where we had bin laden pinned down before bush walked away and decided to invade iraq instead?

two bush failures in one.

meanwhile the DOW tanked another 679 points today to end up at 8579. is it too late to get our $850B back? so much for corporate welfare.

Lynn
October 10, 2008 10:15 AM

This post discusses an alternate view of the "Uighurs" in this case. Hard to know which to believe, although the fact that these folks were apparetnly involved in coordinated assaults against their guards while in custody sort of belies the suggestion that they were poor refugee farmers who were turned over to the US for reward money . . .

http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/another-view-of-the-release-of-the-uighurs/#comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Reformed Chicks Blabbing

About Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.