Larry Flynt's makes Sarah Palin porn film

*snicker* Sounds like someone is jealous.

Oh come on, Guy...you know you want a piece of her!

It's more likely a matter of unbelievers targeting believers.

Mark Driscoll (Seattle) told recently of Seattle's annual "humpfest". Amateur porn films, all shown in one theater...and in order to qualify the film has to include the annual "mascot" (for lack of a better term) that proves the film was made for that year's event. This year...the qualifier is Mars Hill Church and Mark Driscoll. So, this growing church (with many children attending) is finding people trying to have intercourse in their bathrooms and elsewhere on their property.

"As to people from other countries not getting what we are doing, we run that risk no matter what we post. People from other countries think that they understand us but they usually don't. Though I would be surprised if someone came here and thought we were advocating a Republican salvation message. I never advocate moralism on this blog. I have two things that I want the next president to do for us: protect us from another attack and to install justices that will overturn Roe v. Wade (lowering taxes would be a plus as would controlling spending :-) but I would defy anyone to demonstrate how that is advocating Christ's kingdom on earth through the federal government. I look at it as justice."

Yes...thank you, Bill Clinton and NAFTA.

Thank you business taxes.

There's enough blame to go around.

Palin's tax returns show that she failed to pay taxes on income she received from the state in the form of per diem payments. So that makes her a tax evader as well as a subpoena refuser. We don't need another dishonest person who believes he/she is above the law leading our country. That lack of character and arrogant attitude is precisely what has led to the disaster we are now paying for in Iraq and on Wall Street.

"Republican state legislators, at the behest of the McCain campaign, have now filed an emergency appeal with the Alaska Supreme Court trying to shutdown the 'Troopergate' investigation. The plaintiffs (echoing the Bush v. Gore decision) claim `the plaintiffs and Alaskans will suffer irreparable harm' if the Branchflower report is released, as scheduled, next Friday, October 10th.

"Bear in mind, the people in charge of the investigation moved the release date up so as not to have it released on the eve of the election. That was the original schedule long before Palin was chosen as veep nominee. And the GOP lawyers the McCain campaign sent to Alaska have succeeded in having almost all the parties connected to Palin refuse to cooperate with the investigation. So it's not completely clear just what Branchflower is going to be able to come up with, either inculpating or exculpating.

"But this is an opportunity to refocus our attention on something that has been lost in the nonstop coverage of Palin's campaign trail lies and botched interviews: her record in Alaska strongly suggests she lacks the character to be trusted with high office. Though the troopergate scandal is tied narrowly to Palin's firing of Alaska's top cop, Walt Monegan, the heart of the story is about a private vendetta that Palin tried to settle using her new powers as the chief executive of the state of Alaska. Thwarted in doing so, all evidence suggests she fired the public official who refused to execute her plan.

"Nor is it the only example. Both as mayor and governor, Palin has shown the tell-tale signs of a politician who hires cronies and fires or blackballs critics. This part of Palin's record gets deep in the weeds. So it's not as flashy as the boffo interviews or and irresistible as the straight-up lies she's been caught in. But we need no closer example than the Bush administration to know that people like this are dangerous and corrosive to our public institutions."

--Josh Marshall www.talkingpointsmemo.com

"As to people from other countries not getting what we are doing, we run that risk no matter what we post. People from other countries think that they understand us but they usually don't. Though I would be surprised if someone came here and thought we were advocating a Republican salvation message. I never advocate moralism on this blog. I have two things that I want the next president to do for us: protect us from another attack and to install justices that will overturn Roe v. Wade (lowering taxes would be a plus as would controlling spending :-) but I would defy anyone to demonstrate how that is advocating Christ's kingdom on earth through the federal government. I look at it as justice."

Posted by: Guy Arthur Thomas' Girlfriend | October 4, 2008 4:14 PM

--------------------------

You LEFTY LIB MARXIST ... this is what the Obamatrons do, promoting MARXISM and pretending to be Christian.

Absolutely NO sense at all.

Next Please!

P.S. But thanks for always making the point of conservatives about the nature of LEFTY LIB MARXISTS.

MzEllen, I think you have the same form of impairment as Michele.

"Larry Flynt's" is the possessive. As in "Larry Flynt's wheelchair" or "Larry Flynt's obscenity conviction" or "Larry Flynt's porn empire."

If Michele meant to say that Larry Flynt made or is making a porn film, she should have said: "Larry Flynt Makes Palin Porn Film" (using the noraml journalistic convention of putting headlines in the present tense) or, more awkwardly, "Larry Flynt's Making Palin Porn," i.e., "Larry Flynt IS Making Palin Porn."

As written, her headline makes no sense and neither does "Hewitt's Defends Palin."

I hope Michele's academic papers aren't riddled with such errors. She'll never make it through grad school that way. Unless of course Westminster Theological has set the bar as low as the one set for Palin before the debate.

Yelladawg, I'm aware of typos and grammar errors. I'm also aware that when a person is unable to make a case of their own, they are more likely to point out typos and grammar mistakes.

If your inability to stay on the thread (Flynt and porn) is not the fault of your proofreader, it must be that you don't have anything meaningful to add to the conversation.

Well, I'd have to say porn focuses more on the woman than the man. And porn is targeted more towards men anyway (in my opinion). It's business, the consensus is Sarah Palin is good-looking - and her looks have been the butt of a few jokes. It's going to sell - that's the idea. Now, Obama has been lampooned in other ways too.

Link Not Safe for Work - View at your own risk.
http://gawker.com/5042540/american-apparel-spoofer-porn+sassinates-obama

You are too funny! I like you. You make me laugh.

If your inability to stay on the thread (Flynt and porn) is not the fault of your proofreader, it must be that you don't have anything meaningful to add to the conversation.

Posted by: MzEllen | October 4, 2008 8:25 PM
______________________________________________

Another LEFTY whining about not being able to write. MARXIST schools must be teaching perfect grammar these days.

LEFTIST whiner RAGAMUFFIN!

Next, please!

flynt is just preparing the public should palin/mccain win. no doubt she'll screw us all, be it in a much, much different way.

Michele:

Larry Flynt represents the left in the same way that GAT represents the right. Not at all. Please think before you post.

mcsame/palinsane want to continue bush's secretive fascist war-mongering government.

mcsame will do anything for POWER. he has to compensate for his past humiliations. palin already has her sights on the presidency. talk about presumptive and arrogant, slipping and saying "on a palin and mccain ticket." she can't wait to be the top dog instead of mcsame's lapdog.

MzEllen, has it escaped your notice that it is a Republican Administration that has been practicing "lobster salad socialism" (as someone so cleverly put it on this blog--sorry I can't remember who or I'd credit it)?? Seems to me Republicans support socialism as long as it benefits the wealthiest 1%. As for the rest of us . . . it's bootstraps, baby, bootstraps!

By the way, remember the quotation Palin used at the end of her debate on Thursday, the one from Ronald Reagan that warns "you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children's children, what it once was like in America when men were free"?

Turns out that the threat to our liberties he was so worried about wasn't Communism, wasn't an erosion of civil liberties, wasn't the U.S. making preemptive war a centerpiece of its foreign policy, wasn't the U.S. violating the Geneva Conventions. The TERRIBLE TERRIBLE THREAT? Take a wild guess, I dare you.

Medicare.

For more on Reagan's fight against Medicare see http://www.larrydewitt.net/Essays/Reagan.htm

SO: "The real meaning of the line Republicans want to leave you at the end of the debate is an early 1960s far right wing talking point that Medicare = Loss of Freedom.

"Reminder: We Republicans are the party against Medicare.

"There seem to be some real paleoconservatives in the Sarah Palin speechwriting shop. This is so much a reminder of her convention speech. [In which she quoted the Fascist Westbrook Pegler, who called for the assassination of Franklin Roosevelt AND Bobby Kennedy, on the glories of `small town America.']"

Flint is just doing what he does...makes porn films. Can't see that just because he wishes to use a Palin look alike is a problem. I'm sure there are look alikes for a lot of "famous folks" in his films..male and female. However this particular one might sell more, since he'll be sure and advertise that her "twin" is in it...for those that are interested.

wait NONE of you have seen the countless photos of Obama do'en Hillery??
raunchy video, photoshoped picture...
who cares we know it's not the real deal..
if some sick SOB get's his jollys off on it and doesn't vote because of it .. them Flynt has accomplished his work

If your inability to stay on the thread (Flynt and porn) is not the fault of your proofreader, it must be that you don't have anything meaningful to add to the conversation.

Posted by: MzEllen | October 4, 2008 8:25 PM
______________________________________________

Another LEFTY whining about not being able to write. MARXIST schools must be teaching perfect grammar these days.

LEFTIST whiner RAGAMUFFIN!

Next, please!

Posted by: Guy Arthur Thomas | October 5, 2008 12:48 AM
________________________________________________________

Once again, for the record the above is not my post. Obviously a LEFTY LIB who cannot think for themselves must mascaraed as me. What is new? Not much in the way of limited LEFTY LIB thinking.

Next Please (and for the record, DUMMY ABOVE I don't put a comma between Next and Please).

The point that everyone seems to avoid is that Palin is a vice presidential candidate. And pornography is about the reduction of ALL women to non-human animal status for the pleasure of men.

"Free speech" stops being free when it creates harm. Treating any woman like that is bad enough, treating all women as if we can be silenced by threats of sexual intimidation if we aren't "good little sardinesuckers for the patriarchy" is even worse, but to treat a vice presidential candidate in this way is over-the-top pure hatred of females and no excuse.

I am deeply profoundly insulted on Palin's behalf, but dear freaking god am I sick to freaking death of men on account of my own. They are worthless cretins who enjoy causing pain to females, so let's get rid of them and be done with it.

This is sexism, but those nice liberal men from the "social justice" party are too busy screaming about non-existent racism to notice.

sorry, but the porn industry relies on both men and women for their products. and for your information there are female porn magazine and movie publishers, and customers, too.

just pointing out some facts for you.

This is a great idea! Palin is HOTTTTT! GIVE IT TO HER!

Andrea,

Pornography films of consenting adults do not harm anyone. If you don't like it, don't watch it.

Butch,

The perception is already that Obama is not qualified?? It is a sad day in America when we try to make this a black and white issue. The truth of the matter is we really have no idea what Obama stands for. Everything we do know is a bit questionabable: does he have muslin ties? wy does he not put his hand over his heart during the pledge? why has he be so closly tied to so many people with backgrounds that don't support America? This race has come down more to who we don't want than who we do want. That's unfortunate but true.

"This is the response of the left to a strong, capable woman who happens to be attractive, reduce her to an object that can be manipulated."

Attractive, yes. Capable, hardly. Look at the bright side, at least her porn stand in will have a better on screen appearance than the real "strong and capable" Sarah did on Katie Couric.

John, (your comments below)
Are you a puppet of the Rove/Republican machine?
"we have no idea?" Ever hear of THE INTERNET?
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
He puts his hand over his heart. He is a CHRISTIAN AMERICAN.
How can you complain about the former pastor of his CHRISTIAN CHURCH
in the same breath you ask about his "muslim ties"?
Closely tied? You must believe verbatim all the lies of Rove/McCain.
He was on an http://www.annenbergfoundation.org/ board with Ayers and
other Republicans (Annenberg was a REPUBLICAN, btw) 10 years ago,
Obama has repudiated the acts of Ayers when Barack was TEN.
Get a CLUE!
A vote for John McCAin is a vote for MORE OF THE SAME.
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for an America we can be proud of!
October 15, 2008 9:45 AM

Butch,

The perception is already that Obama is not qualified?? It is a sad day in America when we try to make this a black and white issue. The truth of the matter is we really have no idea what Obama stands for. Everything we do know is a bit questionabable: does he have muslin ties? wy does he not put his hand over his heart during the pledge? why has he be so closly tied to so many people with backgrounds that don't support America? This race has come down more to who we don't want than who we do want. That's unfortunate but true.

Nate Moreno said:

"Those things like 'her beauty and her looks' that you are angry at FLYNT FOR USING are what even FOX NEWS and TIME Magazine USE AS THEIR TALKING BOYS!"

Uhh...you mean talking POINTS? Duhhhhh...

I am an educated woman who thinks Palin is beautiful and I will enjoy watching the movie. You have to appreciate art and sex.