A socialist democratic party. Ah-ha! To all you people who told me I didn't know what I was talking about when I called Obama a Marxist, here you go....
Give it up, Michele. With the trajectory that McCain's campaign has been on these last few days, all your muckraking and fear-mongering won't work.
McCain's campaign is dead in the water, and Palin's chances at the VP along with it. Stick a fork in the GOP this year. They're done.
Charles Cosimano
October 8, 2008 7:35 PM
It is looking like the choice of Mrs. Moosebreath was the beginning of the collapse of the McCain campaign. As of today he's ten points behind in Wisconsin and I don't think even the Bradley Effect can compensate for that. He really needed an expert on the economy for a running mate, not someone who's only talents seem to be giving birth over and over again and screeching.
yelladawgNC
October 8, 2008 8:06 PM
Time to piss on the fire and call the dogs.
Nice try, Michele. Hope you come to your senses one of these days and disavow your fear-mongering, anti-American, hatred-inciting, race-baiting party of liars, hypocrites, crooks, demagogues and traitors. Of course, now that y'all have wrecked the nation's economy through your untrammeled greed and handed Osama bin Laden the very thing he wanted but could never have accomplished himself--bringing America to its knees--we will all have to live with the consequences.
But don't imagine we'll forget who was responsible. Not ever.
Moonshadow
October 8, 2008 9:07 PM
Brooks decried Palin's anti-intellectualism and compared her to President Bush in that regard:
"He [Bill Buckley] thought it was important to have people on the conservative side who celebrated ideas, who celebrated learning. And his whole life was based on that, and that was also true for a lot of the other conservatives in the Reagan era. Reagan had an immense faith in the power of ideas. But there has been a counter, more populist tradition, which is not only to scorn liberal ideas but to scorn ideas entirely."
via Crunchy Con
Gene
October 8, 2008 9:27 PM
Not one discussion of any issue here in weeks.
James H.
October 8, 2008 9:51 PM
Though I hate to even dignify the sort of smear tactic that most Americans are coming to see as the characteristic strategy of a campaign in its last throes trying to exploit the deep-seated racial prejudice that remains a underlying force in the US, socialism and Marxism are most definitely not the same thing. There might be some similarities both in terms of origins and ideology, but anyone with even a cursory knowledge of politics outside the United States should be able to point out that the label socialism applies to a wide ideological spectrum that, though it may include Marxism on one extreme end, certainly doesn't necessitate such a connection. Countries like Sweden and even Canada, though they may have certain socialist aspects to their political system, are not Marxist. Confirmation of this can also be found in Marx's own writings, where the socialism of his contemporaries is often the main target of trenchant critique. Not only that, but it is obvious to anyone who is capable of using the Internet to check things on their own, that applying the term socialist to The New Party is misleading at best.
In addition, the fact that Obama may have some sort of sympathy with a Marxist account of history or some form of socialism should not really be that troubling to someone writing from "a Reformed perspective." Perhaps the greatest American Reformed theologian of the twentieth century, Reinhold Niebuhr, was an ardent supporter of many socialist causes throughout his life. More recently, Nicholas Wolterstorff, a philosopher/theologian who is most certainly in the Reformed tradition laid out a number of ways in which Calvinism and Marxist accounts of history share much and might fruitfully engage in dialogue in his book, Until Justice and Peace Embrace.
The fact that you immediately without any discernment jump from a loose association between Obama and the New Party, a third party that may have loose socialist inclinations, to the proposition 'Obama=Marxist' is a perfect illustration of the dangers of conflating American civil religion with the Reformed tradition. Its also a bit disturbing to see someone who approaches politics from a Reformed perspective buying into the McCain campaign's recent efforts to try and exploit prejudice and paint Obama as an associate of Terrorists/Marxists/Muslims, etc.
I was recently at a McCain campaign event and the kind of things that were being thrown around about who Obama was were absolutely disgusting and showed the worst parts of America's political history. You may have seen some of this going around the internet lately as well with videos of people calling obama a terrorist or Muslim or using his middle name. Maybe there not coming from McCain or people in his campaign but it would be nice to see them move toward a way of campaigning that doesn't encourage this or at least come out and try to tell their supporters that this kind of junk should is inappropriate and needs to stop.
James H.
October 8, 2008 10:02 PM
Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. McCarthyism went out of style in the 1950s.
And by the way, if you aren't aware, pretty much everyone (including the US Senate) except the few remaining members of the John Birch Society agrees that McCarthy's anti-American activities hearing weren't the best chapter in American history.
And this is even worse - McCarthyism squared since your side is using McCarthy's tactics to suggest that Obama is a communist AND a muslim terrorist.
Lynn
October 8, 2008 10:03 PM
The thing about small "c" communists is that, as a general rule, they really don't have much love for this country. In fact, deep down, they're kinda like Ayers and Pfleger and Wright in their fundamental antipathy to what most people would consider to be basic American values (little things like independence, achievement, competition, entreprenuerialism, private property, national borders, patriotism . . . etc., etc.).
But golly, I guess no one here gives a sh*t!
For anyone interested in a run down of the "troubling associations," here's a good precis (in a British publication, of course) - and may the MSM be d*mned for refusing to vett - and more often than not actively WHITEWASHING - this guy's background.
If being a socialist is such a good thing, why is Obama hiding it? Some could call it a cover up. He's trying to hide his past associations because he knows that America doesn't want a socialist President. He's running a deceptive campaign.
If he's not a socialist anymore, he should admit his past activities and explain what changed his mind. I would respect that. Heck, Reagan spoke of his socialist past. Is he trying to hide it because he still is one and doesn't want the American public to know it?
anonymous reincarnate
October 8, 2008 10:34 PM
fearmongers unite. and let's call ourselves republicans.
ds0490
October 8, 2008 10:45 PM
Let's see. Sarah Palin a member of a secessionist political group? No problem! Barack Obama a member of a communist group? Call the KKK, we gotta burn a cross tonight!
Keep talking. You're doing more for the American Humanist Association than any amount of advertising we could purchase! All we need to do is point folks to your blog and they get to see what Christianity is all about...political power.
Keep up the good work!
yelladawgNC
October 8, 2008 11:30 PM
Today Cindy McCain was excoriating Obama for voting against funding the troops. She neglected to mention that her husband just received a grade of "D" from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America for his lousy voting record on veterans' issues, including funding the troops, while Obama and Biden received B's. McCain repeatedly tried to block passage of the new G.I. Bill and then when it passed despite his opposition, tried to take credit for it. He missed 6 out of 9 of the votes on such issues in the last congressional year.
This is the kind of rank hypocrisy that is so characteristic of McCain and the Republicans in general. It frankly turns my stomach, especially as someone who grew up in the military and saw firsthand the kind of sacrifices military families make. I hope the truth of McCain's record on veterans' issues gets out there, loud and clear. People need to know that just as the Republican party has cynically used and abused religion and religious people for political ends, they are using and abusing the military and the flag.
yelladawgNC
October 8, 2008 11:46 PM
For a real laugh, watch John Oliver's analysis of "The Stupid Vote" on the Daily Show here:
Hey, Michele...what does the GOP have as a plan to help our economy? What do they have as a plan to resolve the trade imbalance? How about moving beyond petroleum and into alternative forms of energy?
No answer?
*crickets*
Yeah...thought so.
www.barackobama.com/index.php
yelladawgNC
October 9, 2008 12:15 AM
The 13-minute video "Keating Economics" is excellent; it not only traces McCain's history with Charles Keating, who essentially looted the Lincoln Savings and Loan and cheated thousands of people out of their life savings, requiring a buge government bailout, but it will also help you understand the practices that have directly led to what is going on right now. It's not a political rant; it just lays out the facts in a way almost anyone can understand, even if you have only the most basic knowledge of economic concepts. Watch it; you'll learn something important.
McCain Ties to Nazi Collaborators and Ultra-Right-Wing Death Squads
GOP presidential nominee John McCain has past connections to a private group that supplied aid to guerrillas seeking to overthrow the leftist government of Nicaragua in the Iran-Contra affair.
McCain himself was closely connected to a private group that supplied aid to rebels trying to overthrow the leftist government of Nicaragua during the Iran-Contra affair.
The U.S. Council for World Freedom was part of an international organization linked to former Nazi collaborators and ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America.
In the Iran-Contra affair, the Reagan White House arranged covert arms shipments to the Contra rebels financed in part by secret arms sales to Iran.
Elected to the House in 1982 and at a time when he was on the board of [the U.S. Council for World Freedom], McCain was among Republicans on Capitol Hill expressing support for the Contras.
the WACL was labeled by the anti-defamation league as "a gathering place for extremists, racists and anti-semites."
yes, mccain was a proud board member of a council of fascist, radical right-wing, neo-nazi terrorists.
Gene
October 9, 2008 8:24 AM
The more hate and bigotry the American people here, the higher Obama surges in the polls.
Keep it up, please.
david
October 9, 2008 8:59 AM
Probably a fraud. No evidence except for some supposed deleted web page from twelve years ago? Why no MSM coverage? Wouldn't fox noise be all over this?
David
October 9, 2008 9:15 AM
I mean if someone could find this stuff just by googling "Obama" and "New Party" wouldn't we have heard about this months ago? Unless he never really was involved or the organization isn't really much of an organization. And I noticed the other two supposed sources...but still...all this "evidence" looks very suspect.
Lynn
October 9, 2008 9:36 AM
Forcing the guy to come clean about his basic political outlook is not an act of hatred or bigotry - and I'll venture to guess Obama's membership in an overtly socialist party are something most people would find highly relevant - yet the information in this report was SCRUBBED from several locations - it finally turned up in an out of the way internet cache for non-profits! The guy is doing everything in his power to prevent a full examination of his past. He flat out lied about his extensive prior involvement with Ayers - even CNN was forced to admit it, to the obvious chagrin of Cooper Anderson; he refuses to release a list of legal clients or the work he did for them; his Illinois Sentate records are missing; he won't release his bar application, senior thesis or his school records from Columbia or Harvard. This is stuff we ought to be entitled to see before a presidential election.
Moonshadow
October 9, 2008 9:44 AM
More recently, Nicholas Wolterstorff, a philosopher/theologian who is most certainly in the Reformed tradition laid out a number of ways in which Calvinism and Marxist accounts of history share much and might fruitfully engage in dialogue in his book
In despising socialism, it would be her Republican values outweighing her Calvinist convictions, except for the "freedom in Christ" bit. IOW, you can quote Reformed theologians all day - we've all tried it - but they have no authority over her.
A smattering of institutions in our world seem to be turning socialist these days. It is a desperate act, just enough to keep people alive.
Moonshadow
October 9, 2008 9:58 AM
I just came across this at the Society for Biblical Literature (SBL) website, on English Bible translations; it seems related to our discussion here:
The Revised Standard Version (RSV) This 1952 American revision of the ASV took further steps to modernize the language of the translation and to embrace textual criticism. ... Some of the changes to the text led to controversy as the translators, mostly SBL members, and their translation were deemed communist by Sen. Joseph McCarthy and others!
Minnie: "McCain's campaign is dead in the water, and Palin's chances at the VP along with it. Stick a fork in the GOP ... They're done."
Only in your dreams, my dear. All the latest tracking polls (with the sole exception of Gallup Tracking) show the race has tightened considerably in the past 3 days. And for one good reason: B.O. has consistently lied about his past and folks are beginning to have justifiable doubts about this phony. He is, in the headline of a recent Charles Krauthammer column, "The Perfect Stranger."
Obama supporters: I know you're angry about a lot of things and many of you hate Bush. But for the sake of your children -- and for the love of your country -- don't hand the country over to this crypto-Marxist.
yelladawgNC
October 9, 2008 10:34 AM
You're full of bull, Reaganite--and so was your hero, whose huge tax cuts for the wealthiest and resulting exploding deficits started us down the road to this disaster.
There is no way your Republicans are going to steal THIS election. You're toast.
But don't take my word for it. Go to www.fivethirtyeight.com or better yet, Intrade.
Reaganite in NYC
October 9, 2008 11:31 AM
YellowDogNC: "You're full of bull, Reaganite-- ..."
My, my, we're getting a little touchy, aren't we now? The polls are tightening, indeed, which may explain YellowDogNC's nasty temper this morning. Sadly, however, there is a high probability that B.O. will still be able swindle enough people with his impossible promise of tax cuts for 95% of the voters.
"Tax cuts for the middle class" Hmmmmm, who was the last Presidential candidate to peddle that moonshine? Why, William Jefferson Clinton, of ocurse, who proceeded once in office to ram down the biggest tax increase in the 20th century.
Don't trust this "Perfect Stranger." He tells us that his long-time ally, unrepentant terrorist William Ayres, was just a "guy living in the neighborhood. That's all."
Liar, liar, liar! William Ayres and his terrorist bedmate, Bernadette Dorn, hosted B.O.'s first ever campaign event as a budding young Marxist candidate for state senate back in 1996.
Minnie
October 9, 2008 12:14 PM
Only in your dreams, my dear.
Keep telling yourself that if it gets you through the day. McCain's camp is desperate and flailing, and at the rate they're going, they will be trounced soundly. That's just a fact.
While you're at it, get used to the phrases "President Obama" and "Vice President Biden", since you'll be hearing them a lot after November 4th.
MarcM
October 9, 2008 4:10 PM
Reaganite is yet another Nero fiddling while Rome burns. In this case, Rome is our economic system, which has burned while under the watch of Reaganite's party.
But, hey, listen to Reaganite. Why worry about the economy, your savings, your retirement, or your job? It's important that we worry about William Ayers and his relationship to Obama!
Of course, Reaganite conveniently forgets to mention John McCain's relationship with "Joe Bananas" Bonanno, the New York crime boss. He also forgets, conveniently, to discuss McCain's affiliation with former Arizona governor, convicted felon Fife Symington.
Well, what's a GOP hack to do when his candidate is tanking so badly? Of course he will follow the party leadership and bring out the character assassination.
Of course, given how Palin is riling up the masses, maybe character isn't the only thing the GOP wants assassinated this campaign season?
MarcM
October 9, 2008 4:22 PM
"The polls are tightening, indeed, which may explain YellowDogNC's nasty temper this morning."
What bizarre masturbatory fantasy is hitting you today, Reaganite?
These numbers are as of today, the 9th. Now maybe you are on the same drugs that make John McCain think that the fundamentals of our economy are still sound, or that people really give a rip about the Ayers matter. I don't know. But I would strongly suggest that you stop this behavior before you go totally blind.
MarcM
October 9, 2008 4:34 PM
Gallup link: www.gallup.com/Home.aspx
Ispos link: www.ap-ipsosresults.com/
anonymous reincarnate
October 9, 2008 4:40 PM
"Liar, liar, liar! William Ayres and his terrorist bedmate, Bernadette Dorn, hosted B.O.'s first ever campaign event as a budding young Marxist candidate for state senate back in 1996."
you're uninformed, or misinformed. perhaps you need to stop hanging out in those lunatic fringe right-wing groups.
"The polls are tightening, indeed..."
actually, that's your butt-pucker that is tightening. hold on, reaganite, the republican party that ronald raygun destroyed with his "trickle down" deception is in for a bumpy ride!
several key swing states show obama breaking away from mccain in the polls. not only does he lead national opinion polls, he leads especially where it matters: on the electoral map.
UPDATE, 4 pm: The Cook Political Report is also amping up their predictions of Democratic gains in the House and Senate next month. In the latest updates, Charlie Cook now says Democrats are positioned to win between six and eight Senate seats and 15 to 25 House seats. "At this stage, the most relevant question would seem to be: 'How big will the train wreck be for the Republican Party up and down the ballot in November,'" writes Charlie.
------
That would give the Democrats 59 Senate seats and 262 House seats.
Here's a new word you might want to start using to describe the Republicans, Reaganite.
Impotent
ds0490
October 9, 2008 6:29 PM
"actually, that's your butt-pucker that is tightening. hold on, reaganite, the republican party that ronald raygun destroyed with his "trickle down" deception is in for a bumpy ride!"
Ah, yes...the demented old fossil who started us on this ride to economic failure. You really have to wonder, with all the stories about Reagan falling asleep at meetings, if that Alzheimers was really more of a factor earlier on in his administration.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Give it up, Michele. With the trajectory that McCain's campaign has been on these last few days, all your muckraking and fear-mongering won't work.
McCain's campaign is dead in the water, and Palin's chances at the VP along with it. Stick a fork in the GOP this year. They're done.
It is looking like the choice of Mrs. Moosebreath was the beginning of the collapse of the McCain campaign. As of today he's ten points behind in Wisconsin and I don't think even the Bradley Effect can compensate for that. He really needed an expert on the economy for a running mate, not someone who's only talents seem to be giving birth over and over again and screeching.
Time to piss on the fire and call the dogs.
Nice try, Michele. Hope you come to your senses one of these days and disavow your fear-mongering, anti-American, hatred-inciting, race-baiting party of liars, hypocrites, crooks, demagogues and traitors. Of course, now that y'all have wrecked the nation's economy through your untrammeled greed and handed Osama bin Laden the very thing he wanted but could never have accomplished himself--bringing America to its knees--we will all have to live with the consequences.
But don't imagine we'll forget who was responsible. Not ever.
Brooks decried Palin's anti-intellectualism and compared her to President Bush in that regard:
"He [Bill Buckley] thought it was important to have people on the conservative side who celebrated ideas, who celebrated learning. And his whole life was based on that, and that was also true for a lot of the other conservatives in the Reagan era. Reagan had an immense faith in the power of ideas. But there has been a counter, more populist tradition, which is not only to scorn liberal ideas but to scorn ideas entirely."
via Crunchy Con
Not one discussion of any issue here in weeks.
Though I hate to even dignify the sort of smear tactic that most Americans are coming to see as the characteristic strategy of a campaign in its last throes trying to exploit the deep-seated racial prejudice that remains a underlying force in the US, socialism and Marxism are most definitely not the same thing. There might be some similarities both in terms of origins and ideology, but anyone with even a cursory knowledge of politics outside the United States should be able to point out that the label socialism applies to a wide ideological spectrum that, though it may include Marxism on one extreme end, certainly doesn't necessitate such a connection. Countries like Sweden and even Canada, though they may have certain socialist aspects to their political system, are not Marxist. Confirmation of this can also be found in Marx's own writings, where the socialism of his contemporaries is often the main target of trenchant critique. Not only that, but it is obvious to anyone who is capable of using the Internet to check things on their own, that applying the term socialist to The New Party is misleading at best.
In addition, the fact that Obama may have some sort of sympathy with a Marxist account of history or some form of socialism should not really be that troubling to someone writing from "a Reformed perspective." Perhaps the greatest American Reformed theologian of the twentieth century, Reinhold Niebuhr, was an ardent supporter of many socialist causes throughout his life. More recently, Nicholas Wolterstorff, a philosopher/theologian who is most certainly in the Reformed tradition laid out a number of ways in which Calvinism and Marxist accounts of history share much and might fruitfully engage in dialogue in his book, Until Justice and Peace Embrace.
The fact that you immediately without any discernment jump from a loose association between Obama and the New Party, a third party that may have loose socialist inclinations, to the proposition 'Obama=Marxist' is a perfect illustration of the dangers of conflating American civil religion with the Reformed tradition. Its also a bit disturbing to see someone who approaches politics from a Reformed perspective buying into the McCain campaign's recent efforts to try and exploit prejudice and paint Obama as an associate of Terrorists/Marxists/Muslims, etc.
I was recently at a McCain campaign event and the kind of things that were being thrown around about who Obama was were absolutely disgusting and showed the worst parts of America's political history. You may have seen some of this going around the internet lately as well with videos of people calling obama a terrorist or Muslim or using his middle name. Maybe there not coming from McCain or people in his campaign but it would be nice to see them move toward a way of campaigning that doesn't encourage this or at least come out and try to tell their supporters that this kind of junk should is inappropriate and needs to stop.
Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. McCarthyism went out of style in the 1950s.
And by the way, if you aren't aware, pretty much everyone (including the US Senate) except the few remaining members of the John Birch Society agrees that McCarthy's anti-American activities hearing weren't the best chapter in American history.
And this is even worse - McCarthyism squared since your side is using McCarthy's tactics to suggest that Obama is a communist AND a muslim terrorist.
The thing about small "c" communists is that, as a general rule, they really don't have much love for this country. In fact, deep down, they're kinda like Ayers and Pfleger and Wright in their fundamental antipathy to what most people would consider to be basic American values (little things like independence, achievement, competition, entreprenuerialism, private property, national borders, patriotism . . . etc., etc.).
But golly, I guess no one here gives a sh*t!
For anyone interested in a run down of the "troubling associations," here's a good precis (in a British publication, of course) - and may the MSM be d*mned for refusing to vett - and more often than not actively WHITEWASHING - this guy's background.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/2178136/subversives-for-obama.thtml
If being a socialist is such a good thing, why is Obama hiding it? Some could call it a cover up. He's trying to hide his past associations because he knows that America doesn't want a socialist President. He's running a deceptive campaign.
If he's not a socialist anymore, he should admit his past activities and explain what changed his mind. I would respect that. Heck, Reagan spoke of his socialist past. Is he trying to hide it because he still is one and doesn't want the American public to know it?
fearmongers unite. and let's call ourselves republicans.
Let's see. Sarah Palin a member of a secessionist political group? No problem! Barack Obama a member of a communist group? Call the KKK, we gotta burn a cross tonight!
Keep talking. You're doing more for the American Humanist Association than any amount of advertising we could purchase! All we need to do is point folks to your blog and they get to see what Christianity is all about...political power.
Keep up the good work!
Today Cindy McCain was excoriating Obama for voting against funding the troops. She neglected to mention that her husband just received a grade of "D" from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America for his lousy voting record on veterans' issues, including funding the troops, while Obama and Biden received B's. McCain repeatedly tried to block passage of the new G.I. Bill and then when it passed despite his opposition, tried to take credit for it. He missed 6 out of 9 of the votes on such issues in the last congressional year.
This is the kind of rank hypocrisy that is so characteristic of McCain and the Republicans in general. It frankly turns my stomach, especially as someone who grew up in the military and saw firsthand the kind of sacrifices military families make. I hope the truth of McCain's record on veterans' issues gets out there, loud and clear. People need to know that just as the Republican party has cynically used and abused religion and religious people for political ends, they are using and abusing the military and the flag.
For a real laugh, watch John Oliver's analysis of "The Stupid Vote" on the Daily Show here:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=187570&title=the-stupid-vote
Hey, Michele...what does the GOP have as a plan to help our economy? What do they have as a plan to resolve the trade imbalance? How about moving beyond petroleum and into alternative forms of energy?
No answer?
*crickets*
Yeah...thought so.
www.barackobama.com/index.php
The 13-minute video "Keating Economics" is excellent; it not only traces McCain's history with Charles Keating, who essentially looted the Lincoln Savings and Loan and cheated thousands of people out of their life savings, requiring a buge government bailout, but it will also help you understand the practices that have directly led to what is going on right now. It's not a political rant; it just lays out the facts in a way almost anyone can understand, even if you have only the most basic knowledge of economic concepts. Watch it; you'll learn something important.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/keatingvideo
McCain Ties to Nazi Collaborators and Ultra-Right-Wing Death Squads
the WACL was labeled by the anti-defamation league as "a gathering place for extremists, racists and anti-semites."
yes, mccain was a proud board member of a council of fascist, radical right-wing, neo-nazi terrorists.
The more hate and bigotry the American people here, the higher Obama surges in the polls.
Keep it up, please.
Probably a fraud. No evidence except for some supposed deleted web page from twelve years ago? Why no MSM coverage? Wouldn't fox noise be all over this?
I mean if someone could find this stuff just by googling "Obama" and "New Party" wouldn't we have heard about this months ago? Unless he never really was involved or the organization isn't really much of an organization. And I noticed the other two supposed sources...but still...all this "evidence" looks very suspect.
Forcing the guy to come clean about his basic political outlook is not an act of hatred or bigotry - and I'll venture to guess Obama's membership in an overtly socialist party are something most people would find highly relevant - yet the information in this report was SCRUBBED from several locations - it finally turned up in an out of the way internet cache for non-profits! The guy is doing everything in his power to prevent a full examination of his past. He flat out lied about his extensive prior involvement with Ayers - even CNN was forced to admit it, to the obvious chagrin of Cooper Anderson; he refuses to release a list of legal clients or the work he did for them; his Illinois Sentate records are missing; he won't release his bar application, senior thesis or his school records from Columbia or Harvard. This is stuff we ought to be entitled to see before a presidential election.
More recently, Nicholas Wolterstorff, a philosopher/theologian who is most certainly in the Reformed tradition laid out a number of ways in which Calvinism and Marxist accounts of history share much and might fruitfully engage in dialogue in his book
In despising socialism, it would be her Republican values outweighing her Calvinist convictions, except for the "freedom in Christ" bit. IOW, you can quote Reformed theologians all day - we've all tried it - but they have no authority over her.
A smattering of institutions in our world seem to be turning socialist these days. It is a desperate act, just enough to keep people alive.
I just came across this at the Society for Biblical Literature (SBL) website, on English Bible translations; it seems related to our discussion here:
The Revised Standard Version (RSV)
This 1952 American revision of the ASV took further steps to modernize the language of the translation and to embrace textual criticism. ... Some of the changes to the text led to controversy as the translators, mostly SBL members, and their translation were deemed communist by Sen. Joseph McCarthy and others!
Imagine!
http://www.sbl-site.org/educational/bibleandcommentary.aspx
Minnie: "McCain's campaign is dead in the water, and Palin's chances at the VP along with it. Stick a fork in the GOP ... They're done."
Only in your dreams, my dear. All the latest tracking polls (with the sole exception of Gallup Tracking) show the race has tightened considerably in the past 3 days. And for one good reason: B.O. has consistently lied about his past and folks are beginning to have justifiable doubts about this phony. He is, in the headline of a recent Charles Krauthammer column, "The Perfect Stranger."
Obama supporters: I know you're angry about a lot of things and many of you hate Bush. But for the sake of your children -- and for the love of your country -- don't hand the country over to this crypto-Marxist.
You're full of bull, Reaganite--and so was your hero, whose huge tax cuts for the wealthiest and resulting exploding deficits started us down the road to this disaster.
There is no way your Republicans are going to steal THIS election. You're toast.
But don't take my word for it. Go to www.fivethirtyeight.com or better yet, Intrade.
YellowDogNC: "You're full of bull, Reaganite-- ..."
My, my, we're getting a little touchy, aren't we now? The polls are tightening, indeed, which may explain YellowDogNC's nasty temper this morning. Sadly, however, there is a high probability that B.O. will still be able swindle enough people with his impossible promise of tax cuts for 95% of the voters.
"Tax cuts for the middle class" Hmmmmm, who was the last Presidential candidate to peddle that moonshine? Why, William Jefferson Clinton, of ocurse, who proceeded once in office to ram down the biggest tax increase in the 20th century.
Don't trust this "Perfect Stranger." He tells us that his long-time ally, unrepentant terrorist William Ayres, was just a "guy living in the neighborhood. That's all."
Liar, liar, liar! William Ayres and his terrorist bedmate, Bernadette Dorn, hosted B.O.'s first ever campaign event as a budding young Marxist candidate for state senate back in 1996.
Only in your dreams, my dear.
Keep telling yourself that if it gets you through the day. McCain's camp is desperate and flailing, and at the rate they're going, they will be trounced soundly. That's just a fact.
While you're at it, get used to the phrases "President Obama" and "Vice President Biden", since you'll be hearing them a lot after November 4th.
Reaganite is yet another Nero fiddling while Rome burns. In this case, Rome is our economic system, which has burned while under the watch of Reaganite's party.
But, hey, listen to Reaganite. Why worry about the economy, your savings, your retirement, or your job? It's important that we worry about William Ayers and his relationship to Obama!
Of course, Reaganite conveniently forgets to mention John McCain's relationship with "Joe Bananas" Bonanno, the New York crime boss. He also forgets, conveniently, to discuss McCain's affiliation with former Arizona governor, convicted felon Fife Symington.
Well, what's a GOP hack to do when his candidate is tanking so badly? Of course he will follow the party leadership and bring out the character assassination.
Of course, given how Palin is riling up the masses, maybe character isn't the only thing the GOP wants assassinated this campaign season?
"The polls are tightening, indeed, which may explain YellowDogNC's nasty temper this morning."
What bizarre masturbatory fantasy is hitting you today, Reaganite?
Research 2000 - Obama +10
Reuters/Zogby - Obama +4 (zogby.com/news/index.cfm)
Battleground - Obama +3 (www.tarrance.com/results.cfm)
Rasmussen - Obama +5 (www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll)
Diageo/Hotline - Obama +6 (www.diageohotlinepoll.com/)
Gallup - Obama +11
Ipsos - Obama +7
These numbers are as of today, the 9th. Now maybe you are on the same drugs that make John McCain think that the fundamentals of our economy are still sound, or that people really give a rip about the Ayers matter. I don't know. But I would strongly suggest that you stop this behavior before you go totally blind.
Gallup link: www.gallup.com/Home.aspx
Ispos link: www.ap-ipsosresults.com/
"Liar, liar, liar! William Ayres and his terrorist bedmate, Bernadette Dorn, hosted B.O.'s first ever campaign event as a budding young Marxist candidate for state senate back in 1996."
you're uninformed, or misinformed. perhaps you need to stop hanging out in those lunatic fringe right-wing groups.
"The polls are tightening, indeed..."
actually, that's your butt-pucker that is tightening. hold on, reaganite, the republican party that ronald raygun destroyed with his "trickle down" deception is in for a bumpy ride!
several key swing states show obama breaking away from mccain in the polls. not only does he lead national opinion polls, he leads especially where it matters: on the electoral map.
Hey, Reaganite...ya gotta love this news!
voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/10/rothenberg_warns_of_gop_bloodb.html
UPDATE, 4 pm: The Cook Political Report is also amping up their predictions of Democratic gains in the House and Senate next month. In the latest updates, Charlie Cook now says Democrats are positioned to win between six and eight Senate seats and 15 to 25 House seats. "At this stage, the most relevant question would seem to be: 'How big will the train wreck be for the Republican Party up and down the ballot in November,'" writes Charlie.
------
That would give the Democrats 59 Senate seats and 262 House seats.
Here's a new word you might want to start using to describe the Republicans, Reaganite.
Impotent
"actually, that's your butt-pucker that is tightening. hold on, reaganite, the republican party that ronald raygun destroyed with his "trickle down" deception is in for a bumpy ride!"
Ah, yes...the demented old fossil who started us on this ride to economic failure. You really have to wonder, with all the stories about Reagan falling asleep at meetings, if that Alzheimers was really more of a factor earlier on in his administration.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.