Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Reformed Chicks Blabbing

Paglia on the Palin Effect

posted by Susan Johnson | 7:04am Wednesday October 8, 2008

I’ve been getting bored with and haven’t bothered to read the many articles on why feminists hate Palin. Why bother reading them when the answer is so obvious. They hate her because she doesn’t bow to their abortion altar. But Paglia is a different kind of feminist, a smart one, that’s why I read what she says and listen to here assertions (I don’t usually agree with her but at least she’s makes an interesting case for her position, she almost convinces me that Obama wouldn’t totally blow it with Iran — almost). She understands that in the Palin vs the MSM, that it’s the MSM who have suffered.

Although nothing will sway my vote for Obama, I continue to enjoy Sarah Palin’s performance on the national stage. During her vice-presidential debate last week with Joe Biden (whose conspiratorial smiles with moderator Gwen Ifill were outrageous and condescending toward his opponent), I laughed heartily at Palin’s digs and slams and marveled at the way she slowly took over the entire event. I was sorry when it ended! But Biden wasn’t — judging by his Gore-like sighs and his slow sinking like a punctured blimp. Of course Biden won on points, but TV (a visual medium) never cares about that.
The mountain of rubbish poured out about Palin over the past month would rival Everest. What a disgrace for our jabbering army of liberal journalists and commentators, too many of whom behaved like snippy jackasses. The bourgeois conventionalism and rank snobbery of these alleged humanitarians stank up the place. As for Palin’s brutally edited interviews with Charlie Gibson and that viper, Katie Couric, don’t we all know that the best bits ended up on the cutting-room floor? Something has gone seriously wrong with Democratic ideology, which seems to have become a candied set of holier-than-thou bromides attached like tutti-frutti to a quivering green Jell-O mold of adolescent sentimentality.

And then there’s this:

The next phase of feminism must circle back and reappropriate the ancient persona of the mother — without losing career ambition or power of assertion. Betty Friedan, who had first attacked the cult of postwar domesticity, had long warned second-wave feminists such as Gloria Steinem about the damaging exclusion of homemakers from their value system. The animus of liberal feminists toward religion must also end (I am speaking as an atheist). Feminism must reexamine all of its assumptions, including its death grip on abortion, if it wishes to survive.

Careful readers of this blog know that I’ve been making a similar point. I’m glad to see that there are feminists who agree that conservative women deserve a place at the table and that the survival of feminism depends on it.



Previous Posts

One Final Word
My dear friend Michele slipped into eternity on Wednesday, February 1.   She was a remarkable woman who left a legacy of faith, determination, and love. For three years she courageously battled the ovarian cancer that eventually robbed her of her life.  A few days before she died, one of her docto

posted 8:43:41pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated
My husband told me that there are rumors that I've died. I'm happy to report that I'm still very much alive. My cancer has gone to stage four but we are controlling it with chemo, the cancer numbers are currently in the normal range. I've stopped blogging to concentrate on my daughters and writing a

posted 7:07:55pm Aug. 23, 2010 | read full post »

An update and a prayer request
Several people have asked about Michele's condition, and have promised to pray for her. On her behalf, I thank you for that. I spoke with her a little while ago, and she asked that I come here and tell you what's going on, and to ask you to pray for her. She isn't able to post here herself right

posted 4:55:36pm Apr. 06, 2010 | read full post »

Rest in peace, Internet Monk.
A man known in the cyber world as The Internet Monk, has died. Michael Spencer lost his battle with cancer tonight. My prayers go out for his family and for all those who loved and will miss him. :(

posted 11:52:00pm Apr. 05, 2010 | read full post »

The peace that passes all understanding, pt. 1
I'm coming out of my normal hiding place to make a few comments. The internet is a strange place. It is often a wonderful place, a helpful place, a unifying place. But it is also alienating, cold, and is the perfect medium in which to depersonalize others. Through it, I have seen people reach out

posted 4:39:08pm Mar. 25, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(18)
post a comment
yelladawgNC

posted October 8, 2008 at 8:31 am


I wonder if Camille still feels this way after Palin whipped up a sicko in her crowd to shout “Kill him!” when she was excoriating Obama because he sat on the board of a charity with some guy who was never convicted of anything and has spent the last couple of decades as an education reformer.
And by the way, here are the words of a man Palin and her husband have far closer ties to:
“ . . . the fires of Hell are glaciers compared to my hate for the American Government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag; I’ll be buried in Dawson and when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones back to Alaska, back to my country.”
“At another point [in that interview] Volger advocated renouncing allegiance to the United States. In the course of denouncing Federal regulation over land, he said:
`And then you get mad. And you say, the hell with them. And you renounce allegiance, and you pledge your efforts, your effects, your honor, your life to Alaska.’
” . . . Palin has courted the group over the years.
“Three years after the controversial interview, in 1994, Palin attended the group’s annual convention, according to witnesses who spoke to ABC News’ Jake Tapper. The McCain campaign is disputing her presence there, but Tapper found two people to attest to it.
“The McCain campaign today produced Palin’s voting registration records, and said they proved she was never a member of the party.
“But she has repeatedly reached out to the group. The McCain campaign has confirmed she visited the group’s 2000 convention, and she addressed its convention THIS YEAR [telling them to keep up the good work], as an incumbent governor whose oath of office includes upholding the Constitution of the United States.
“Palin’s husband, Todd Palin, was a member of the party from 1995-2002 with a brief exception in 2000.”
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com



report abuse
 

yelladawgNC

posted October 8, 2008 at 8:39 am


Here’s a view from another feminist, Erica Jogn:
“Why are these debates so incredibly boring? Is it the questions framed by committee? Is it Tom Brokaw trying to exude gravitas? Is it John McCain telling us constantly he is our friend while he grimaces in a way that is friendly to no one? Or is it Barack Obama keeping his cool despite all the idiotic lies and provocations?
“My admiration for Obama has grown. Not only for his lucid intelligence, his excellent preparation, his understanding that eight years of deregulatin’ dudes (as Sarah Palin might put it) has accelerated this financial mess, but also his amazing ability not to grunt, sigh or punch his opponent. When McCain lies with a straight face and pretends he has never had anything to do with the GOP, I’d slug him. But Obama is a prince among debaters. He just smiles elegantly and awaits his chance for a reasonable response. His calm blows me away. I’d hate to debate him. I’d be raising my voice and tearing my hair (as we did at Jewish dinner tables on the Upper West Side when I was a kid) but he’d be cool as the proverbial cucumber. He will make a great president. His temperament is superb.
“McCain looks old and ill to me. He seems to have no circulation under his papery white skin. He always looks like he is suppressing a fart. He has no cool at all. Even though he tried to correct his curmudgeonly reputation tonight, he was unconvincing. It seemed as if he had taken a Valium and it was wearing off. I wouldn’t trust him to look into Vladimir Putin’s eyes anymore than I trusted George W. Bush. He’s the bomb-bomb King, no question. Erratic and rageful, condescending and insincere, he seemed to be auditioning to play Simon Legree in an antebellum bodice ripper.
“And why did he run from the stage while Michelle Obama and Barack greeted the folks? Was he afraid of retribution? Or possibly a hair transplant?”



report abuse
 

ds0490

posted October 8, 2008 at 9:08 am


Rather strange that Michele hasn’t posted about the debate yet. I guess she hasn’t received the daily GOP talking points yet, so she doesn’t know what she is supposed to think about the debate.



report abuse
 

Gene

posted October 8, 2008 at 11:15 am


She didn’t post about the Couric interview when it happened and probably won’t post about the debate, unless there’s a youtube of Palin looking “cute and perky” last night. She completely ignores what’s actually happening in politics and the election on a daily basis.



report abuse
 

yelladawgNC

posted October 8, 2008 at 11:19 am


Well, I might keep my lip zipped too if my candidate had announced to the world that he wants another $300 billion dollar bailout and said of Social Security that:
“My friends, we are not going to be able to provide the same benefit for present-day workers that we are going — that present-day retirees have today.”
And then went to have what appears to be–putting it kindly–a very bad senior moment in the middle of an answer to the question of “what will you work on first”:
I know how to do that. I have a clear record of reaching across the aisle, whether it be Joe Lieberman or Russ Feingold or Ted Kennedy or others. That’s my clear record.
“We can work on nuclear power plants. Build a whole bunch of them, create millions of new jobs. We have to have all of the above, alternative fuels, wind, tide, solar, natural gas, clean coal technology. All of these things we can do as Americans and we can take on this mission and we can overcome it.
“MY FRIENDS, SOME OF THIS $700 BILLION ENDS UP IN HANDS OF TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS. [Emphasis mine]
“As far as health care is concerned, obviously, everyone is struggling to make sure that they can afford their premiums and that they can have affordable and available health care. That’s the next issue.”
What on earth?!? Get that man to a nice assisted living facility.



report abuse
 

Anne

posted October 8, 2008 at 11:38 am


Lord have mercy on the hatemongers, and those who admire them.



report abuse
 

Charles Cosimano

posted October 8, 2008 at 12:03 pm


Less than four weeks to go!
Will any of us actually live that long? I don’t care who wins any more. I just want it to end!



report abuse
 

Moonshadow

posted October 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm


They hate her because she doesn’t bow to their abortion altar.
It isn’t that for me, obviously … and maybe I’m not much of a feminist, but I’m still leery of the tokenism of her candidacy. I don’t want to be played on that.
‘Though I admit that there’s similar tokenism in Biden’s Catholicism … I believe there’s less emotion involved in me picking a Catholic VP over a woman VP; the former option is, for me, less of a novelty.
Besides, nobody expects too much from a Catholic VP. :-) IOW, Palin puts alot on the line if she wins.
My two cents …



report abuse
 

Scruffy

posted October 8, 2008 at 1:37 pm


I am a retiree. John McCain has all but promised to cut my Medicare, lower my SS benefits and curtail or freeze any payout for further federal assistance. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD I VOTE TO CUT MY OWN THROAT?
Sarah Palin refused to answer questions, mocked tax cuts for the middle class and has not proven anything but that she is a pit bull. Of all the Women in Power, she is the least qualified to lead this Nation. WHY WOULD I VOTE FOR HER? We need a Shepard, not a mongrel, we need a leader, not a anger management dropout. Sarah Palin reminds me of a dog I had to put down who seemed to be friendly but when my back was turned, she killed my kittens and chickens.



report abuse
 

Gerald Ball

posted October 8, 2008 at 2:57 pm


Pardon me, but have you read some of Camille Paglia’s other views? Such as siding with the Andrew Dworkin viewpoint that marital relations between a husband and a wife is rape? (That is basically the default viewpoint of the avant garde homosexual feminism that she represents.) Or her endorsing NAMBLA? (Again, the cutting edge avant garde homosexual agenda.)
Listen, if you want to back McCain – Palin, that is fine. (As I have stated in my past visits, I support neither, because after having been grotesquely burned by George W. Bush I am not going to cast my lot in with yet another person that I will spend the next 4 – 8 years alternating between defending and being disappointed by their wickedness.) But in the course of doing so, please remember that this is a Christian site! How does endorsing the views of someone so revoltingly aggressively flamboyantly evil and wicked like Camille Paglia advance the cause of Jesus Christ? What part of the Body of Jesus Christ are you being by endorsing Paglia? His hands? His eyes? His feet? His ears?
Am I judging you? Why yes, of course I am, and with good reason to.



report abuse
 

anotherbob

posted October 8, 2008 at 3:31 pm


Michele, You’re so reliably outrageous that I can always be sure that I strongly disagree with you.
Perhaps you’re really an double agent who works for the left a strawman/women conservative who we can point to successfully as an example of a right wing religious nutcasae. Your posts often elicit well written responses from your many readers who have love and empathy for others (bleeding heart liberals in Limbaughese) and are appalled by your feigned lack of same. Come on Michele ‘fess up -You’re a double agent!
Katie Couric is hardly a “viper” for asking what sarah palin reads – after all our idiot in chief doesn’t read and the public elected him for a second term.



report abuse
 

Scott R.

posted October 8, 2008 at 4:25 pm


Gerald,
This is not a Xian site. This site is for all faiths.
Perhaps this blog purports to be Xian, but you won’t see much Xian behavior (or anything else) from Michele to demonstrate that she is one.



report abuse
 

Brian aka New Age Cowboy

posted October 8, 2008 at 4:34 pm


Sarah Palin is starting to remind me of Roseanne Barr. Her snarky performance while reading a speech penned by a George W. Bush script writer was like fingernails on a blackboard.
Her recent exchange with a war protester was even worse. For all those folks that would hang military service over my head at this point, post Iraq invasion/NO WMDs, I say you’re kids are tragically ignorant or willfully so for enlisting. Iraq posed no threats to any freedoms I enjoy. Iraq doesn’t border our country and Bush appointee, David McKay said they had no WMD programs, pre-invasion, whatsoever.
It gets even better, Sarah Palin was on the verge of inciting a race riot in northern Florida yesterday. At her rallies, Republicans hurled a racial epitaph at a black sound man, and screamed “kill him” and “treason!” at Barack Obama.
Sarah Palin may get the tragically retarded GOPers to the polls, but the data suggests she’s become a drag on the GOP brand.
As for conservative women, McCain had plenty of good ones to pick from for VP. He screwed up and will ultimately screw our country.



report abuse
 

Moonshadow

posted October 8, 2008 at 4:44 pm


Michele ‘fess up -You’re a double agent!
from Michele to demonstrate that she is one.
Such wishful thinking … she’s the real McCoy. (And that goes ditto for Scott R.)



report abuse
 

Scott R.

posted October 8, 2008 at 5:36 pm


Ditto for me what? I’m a Republican?
God forbid! I’d rather have a skin disease.



report abuse
 

Moonshadow

posted October 8, 2008 at 6:21 pm


Yeah, Scott R., my words weren’t clear, sorry. God forbid that you be a Republican or have a skin disease. Amen.



report abuse
 

anonymous reincarnate

posted October 9, 2008 at 2:07 am


“Palin puts alot on the line if she wins.”
care to elaborate your ideas, moonshadow?



report abuse
 

anonymous reincarnate

posted October 9, 2008 at 11:44 am


here’s “mavericky” for ya – mccain continues to ignore copyright laws and abuse intellectual property rights.
from the foo fighters:

This isn’t the first time the McCain campaign has used a song without making any attempt to get approval or permission from the artist. It’s frustrating and infuriating that someone who claims to speak for the American people would repeatedly show such little respect for creativity and intellectual property.

The saddest thing about this is that My Hero was written as a celebration of the common man and his extraordinary potential. To have it appropriated without our knowledge and used in a manner that perverts the original sentiment of the lyric just tarnishes the song. We hope that the McCain campaign will do the right thing and stop using our song — and start asking artists’ permission in general!

from van halen:

The band had no idea McCain was planning on using “Right Now” during his big entrance in Ohio telling us, “Permission was not sought or granted nor would it have been given.”

from counsel for jackson browne:

Not only have Senator McCain and his agents plainly infringed Mr. Browne’s copyright in Running On Empty, but the Federal Courts have long held that the unauthorized use of a famous singer’s voice in a commercial constitutes a false endorsement and a violation of the singer’s right of publicity.

john mellencamp:

At some recent John McCain campaign rallies, John Mellencamp’s “Our Country” and “Pink Houses” have been booming out over the speakers. Mellencamp hasn’t yet made a public response, but his reps are quietly reaching out to McCain and asking him to stop playing his tunes.

from actor mike meyers:

Mike Myers, insisted that the Arizona Republican take down a web ad that used a clip from his movie Wayne’s World.

heart (ann and nancy wilson):

Heart sent a cease-and-desist notice to the McCain-Palin campaign Thursday afternoon after their hit “Barracuda” was used – twice – without permission as the official rallying cry for the vice presidential candidate after her nomination acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention. McCain campaign officials failed to ask either the group, Universal Music Publishing or Sony BMG whether the song was fair game to use. It wasn’t.

from the band, orleans:

“This is yet another example of John McCain not learning anything from George Bush’s mistakes. First, McCain adopted Bush’s failed policy of an open-ended war in Iraq, then he wrapped his arms around the failed Bush economic policies that have put the squeeze on middle class families. Now, he’s making the same mistake George Bush made illegally using a copyrighted song without asking either the writers or the performers for permission.”

from warner music group:

Warner Music Group demanded that YouTube remove a video, set to Frankie Valli’s “Can’t Take My Eyes Off You” that had been posted on Sen. John McCain’s official YouTube channel. the video has been replaced with the message, “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Warner Music Group”

source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/05/heart-van-halen-orleans-j_n_124264.html



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.