|
Previous Posts
One Final Word
My dear friend Michele slipped into eternity on Wednesday, February 1. She was a remarkable woman who left a legacy of faith, determination, and love. For three years she courageously battled the ovarian cancer that eventually robbed her of her life. A few days before she died, one of her docto
posted 8:43:41pm Feb. 10, 2012 |
read full post
»
The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated
My husband told me that there are rumors that I've died. I'm happy to report that I'm still very much alive. My cancer has gone to stage four but we are controlling it with chemo, the cancer numbers are currently in the normal range. I've stopped blogging to concentrate on my daughters and writing a
posted 7:07:55pm Aug. 23, 2010 |
read full post
»
An update and a prayer request
Several people have asked about Michele's condition, and have promised to pray for her. On her behalf, I thank you for that. I spoke with her a little while ago, and she asked that I come here and tell you what's going on, and to ask you to pray for her. She isn't able to post here herself right
posted 4:55:36pm Apr. 06, 2010 |
read full post
»
Rest in peace, Internet Monk.
A man known in the cyber world as The Internet Monk, has died. Michael Spencer lost his battle with cancer tonight.
My prayers go out for his family and for all those who loved and will miss him. :(
posted 11:52:00pm Apr. 05, 2010 |
read full post
»
The peace that passes all understanding, pt. 1
I'm coming out of my normal hiding place to make a few comments.
The internet is a strange place. It is often a wonderful place, a helpful place, a unifying place. But it is also alienating, cold, and is the perfect medium in which to depersonalize others.
Through it, I have seen people reach out
posted 4:39:08pm Mar. 25, 2010 |
read full post
»
|
posted December 7, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Going by “Joseph” got me wondering, then I saw Fordham and Loyola in his schooling, and I knew.
Let’s hope he can stand up to the corruption that seems to run so rampant.
posted December 8, 2008 at 1:02 am
If his background is Jesuit, I’ll forgive him being Republican!
If he’s smart, he’ll do a great job for two years for New Orleans, retire (because he could be Jesus himself and lose as a GOPer against any other candidate but Bill Jefferson), and then work with Bobby Jindal to elevate his own profile statewide as Jindal elevates his nationwide.
It is possible, with the comprehensive redistricting Louisiana faces in 2011 as a result of the Katrina diaspora, there could be another congressional district where he could then be re-elected.
posted December 8, 2008 at 4:14 pm
How does one possibly get the nickname “Joseph” from Anh? And how does one get the nickame “Kate” from Hieu? That alone makes me question whether he really believes people “crossed racial lines” to vote for him. Nobody should have to Americanize their names that atrociously in this day and age.
posted December 8, 2008 at 4:50 pm
m.e.graves – Who cares where does he get the names from? Do you know how people got their names from Shoemakers, Cook, …etc. because they did not know what their names were so people named them as their occupation…As long as he can help LA to clean up these mess from Democrate… people are happy. Get a life.
posted December 8, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Who cares about the names? It could be something from their culture meaning and translating to English. As long as, he can clean up the mess from William Jefferson… the LAnian people will be happy. Get a life.
posted December 8, 2008 at 5:06 pm
I agreed with TPH. Just like we selected Obama to be our new president (Do you care if his name is Hussen or Sadam?), we want to change from the last 8 yrs of our gov’s corruption and move on with the future. I am looking forward to our new faces and regime.
posted December 8, 2008 at 5:56 pm
As long as he can help LA to clean up these mess from Democrate… people are happy. Get a life.
Wow. On this week’s episode of “Missing the Point Entirely with TPH.”
I’m just happy that there will (hopefully) be less corruption in government, but the focus of my comment had nothing to do with that. Anh Cao stated that Americans “crossed racial lines” to vote for someone they may not have ever seen named Joseph Cao. If the election ballot read his real name, then I will also be more than happy to believe that they did, in fact, “cross racial lines” to vote for him. Until then, that is all I need to say about it.
Don’t you dare tell me to get a life, that’s just intellectually lazy. Try to argue the point. Try to tell me that we can honestly believe people “crossed racial lines” to vote for this man when he somehow had the desire to give himself a nickname of “Joseph”.
Again, I’m not arguing that it’s good to get (hopefully) less corruption in government, I’m arguing what he said about “crossing racial lines”.
posted December 8, 2008 at 8:58 pm
I’m glad that Joesph Cao has won. Let’s hope he would bring back a culture of accountability to Congress and also serve his constituents well.
Good luck, Rep.-elect Joesph Cao.
posted December 8, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Well, good luck to him, I say. I hope he does restore a sense of accountability and cleanliness that was not present in former Rep. Jefferson’s days.
posted December 8, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Don’t you dare tell me to get a life, that’s just intellectually lazy. Try to argue the point.
Welcome to Michelle’s Blabbing Blog – where intellectual consistency and vigor is as un-American as Coos-Coos and East Asians using their birth names!
All kidding aside – don’t read too much into it. Almost every Korean and Vietnamese person I went to college with (in Seattle – lots of Int’l students) Americanized their names. Do I agree with their reasons for doing so? Would I do the same in their shoes? I can’t say I can answer either question, but in any case it’s really not my business.
I do doubt very seriosusly if Mr. Cao campaigned without ever being on TV. People who voted for him knew who he was. Can we say the same for everyone who voted *against* Jefferson? Perhaps not, but I see no reason to read nefarious intent where there probably was none.