|
Previous Posts
One Final Word
My dear friend Michele slipped into eternity on Wednesday, February 1. She was a remarkable woman who left a legacy of faith, determination, and love. For three years she courageously battled the ovarian cancer that eventually robbed her of her life. A few days before she died, one of her docto
posted 8:43:41pm Feb. 10, 2012 |
read full post
»
The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated
My husband told me that there are rumors that I've died. I'm happy to report that I'm still very much alive. My cancer has gone to stage four but we are controlling it with chemo, the cancer numbers are currently in the normal range. I've stopped blogging to concentrate on my daughters and writing a
posted 7:07:55pm Aug. 23, 2010 |
read full post
»
An update and a prayer request
Several people have asked about Michele's condition, and have promised to pray for her. On her behalf, I thank you for that. I spoke with her a little while ago, and she asked that I come here and tell you what's going on, and to ask you to pray for her. She isn't able to post here herself right
posted 4:55:36pm Apr. 06, 2010 |
read full post
»
Rest in peace, Internet Monk.
A man known in the cyber world as The Internet Monk, has died. Michael Spencer lost his battle with cancer tonight.
My prayers go out for his family and for all those who loved and will miss him. :(
posted 11:52:00pm Apr. 05, 2010 |
read full post
»
The peace that passes all understanding, pt. 1
I'm coming out of my normal hiding place to make a few comments.
The internet is a strange place. It is often a wonderful place, a helpful place, a unifying place. But it is also alienating, cold, and is the perfect medium in which to depersonalize others.
Through it, I have seen people reach out
posted 4:39:08pm Mar. 25, 2010 |
read full post
»
|
posted January 5, 2009 at 8:30 am
Why wont people live and let live and stop harrassing those who are different We are all Gods children Stop hurting others because they dont follow the rules you want
posted January 5, 2009 at 9:50 am
How do we ‘know’ that these swastikas were posted by gays? Were the especially artistic? Was the spacing and size indicative of a firm command of style?
Bearing false witness is a sin both of commission and omission.
Why do so many Christians define their love of God through hatred of us?
posted January 5, 2009 at 9:54 am
Some of the most important commonalities between the Nazis and religious conservatives — especially Catholics — were anti-communism, anti-atheism, and anti-secularism. The Nazis were a “secular” party in the sense of not attempting to form a new church or religion and many Nazis tended to be anti-clerical, but support and promotion of “positive Christianity” was an important platform of the Nazi part from its earliest days.
posted January 5, 2009 at 10:25 am
There is a similarity in mindset – yes, I am old enough to have made the acquaintance of both Germans who resisted (those who survived) and those who actually were Nazis – between fundamentalist, literalistic, conservative, followers-of-ancient-traditions and members of the Nazi party.
The revisionism, the pretended ‘not hatred of the person, but of the sin’, the total ignorance of or denial of scientifically gathered evidence to the contrary of their ‘beliefs’…
This is why we must separate church and State.
posted January 5, 2009 at 11:01 am
There is no such thing as a “gay-friendly” Catholic church – it is the gay members of this church’s congregation that are confused, not the protesters
posted January 5, 2009 at 11:49 am
It’s regrettable that whoever did this resorted to vandalism, but it’s well past the time for religious people to get out of politics and to stop forcing their beliefs on everybody else.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:06 pm
I don’t automatically believe that it was anti-prop 8 supporters that wrote the graffiti on the Castro church. It wasn’t long ago that there was anti-gay graffiti on a memorial just blocks away and I believe it too had swastikas. Our enemies lurk the neighborhood with regularity. Think strategy.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Religious conservatives didn’t bankroll the defeat in Florida to the extent they bankrolled the defeat in California.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:10 pm
The difference between Florida and California should be obvious: California’s Prop 8 took away existing marital rights & responsibilities of a group of people and threatens to void currently existing marriages.
Regarding the vandals, not all gay people are the same. We are not all of one mind. And we don’t all control each other.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Given the outpourings of hatred spewed forth by the fundamentalist, conservative, literalistic, followers-of-ancient-creeds “Christians” we see on this website, I shouldn’t be the least surprised if one of them had done it just to have a fresh basis upon which to attack us.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:33 pm
You’d think that gays would know which people are for them
I’m sure they know.
There is no such thing as a “gay-friendly” Catholic church
Huh?
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:40 pm
“expressing different opinions” = “outpourings of hatred”. That really makes sense. Thanks for keeping the conversation adult.
The homosexual sex act is sin, plain and simple. That being said, anger and pride are also sins (among other things), and everybody is guilty of those on occasion. If our society declines to discriminate against people for anger or pride, it shouldn’t discriminate for homosexuality either. I would not deny anybody a job or housing or anything else because of their homosexuality.
But the radical homosexual agenda doesn’t want tolerance, they want celebration. They want to FORCE everybody to openly renounce their beliefs and pay to help them celebrate their sin with marriages and other absurd requests.
posted January 5, 2009 at 12:50 pm
>The homosexual sex act is sin, plain and simple.
That is your church’s doctrine, not mine, so it isn’t
“plain and simple” at all.
And the “tolerance” that “radicals” want is that your church’s doctrine not be forced down the throat of my church – if you want to call that “celebration”, so be it.
posted January 5, 2009 at 1:40 pm
‘Your Name’
Speaking of adult behavior, why not try a pen-name. It makes life easier for all of us.
Considering the number of gays and transgendered people who have been beaten, raped and murdered the last few months in the US, I don’t see why any of my statements are overdrawn.
The Bible (unless you are reading one of those perverted fundamentalist translations of the 20th century) does not even mention the word ‘homosexuality’.
Who are you to define my love for another man as sin? Why do you insist on focusing on sex? I don’t go around kicking divorced people who have remarried out of my church…oh, right, that was only something which that long-haired Jewish Rabi forbade, what was his name, nobody important compared to Paul…just the Son of God.
When ‘Christians’ like you start treating all those ‘sins’ you believe in equally, then I will believe that your motivation is other than hatred. Until then, get yourself a name and stop cherry-picking the Bible.
posted January 5, 2009 at 1:50 pm
As long as we are on the subject, just what exactly is this ‘homosexual act’?
You are going to have some serious problems with that, even assuming you are able to define it.
Please, do.
(Personally, I find our joint mortgage payment every month pretty sinful, maybe you mean that?) Or is it that my partner quit his job and moved to the US to help take care of my elderly parents when my, presumably ‘non-sinful’ heterosexual brother and his family could not be bothered, although they live in the same town?
Oh, and don’t you dare try the old ‘sodomy’ nonsense…the Church defines sodomy as all sexual acts which are not specifically intended to procreate. That covers everything from kissing to having heterosexual intercourse at a time of month when you ‘know’ pregnancy is not possible.
Do shower your wisdom upon us, please.
posted January 5, 2009 at 1:54 pm
“Your wife isn’t really your wife, just a legal stranger with whom you sin.”
“Your relationship is invalid.”
“If your ‘husband’ of 30 years were to be in the hospital, it is perfectly acceptable for his real family to keep you, his ‘wife’ (aka the woman of ill repute he’s living in sin with) from visiting or having any say in his medical care. If he died it would be perfectly OK for his family to back a UHaul up to your front door and take everything you owned together. You’re not his family, so you don’t have a right to any say in the matter.”
This is what you are really saying to gay couples when you tell them they don’t deserve marriage. It’s insightful, so stop being shocked when it makes people angry. No, it does not excuse vandalism or violence in retaliation. However, you don’t get to play the martyr card when you provoke someone into attacking you – you’re both guilty of wrong at that point.
Please stop using Jesus as an excuse to be hateful – Jesus’ message was ‘love one another’ and this crusade against gay marriage is the antithesis of loving your neighbor.
posted January 5, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Anybody who is more indignant about unwanted paint on a wall, than they are about millions of people not being able to choose for themselves whom they marry without the government’s veto, are despicable and need to look at themselves.
posted January 5, 2009 at 2:17 pm
“That is your church’s doctrine, not mine”
“perverted fundamentalist translations of the 20th century”
Oh, great, here comes the “my special translation is the right one” argument. Might as well be a Jehovah’s Witness. Pretty hard to translate “men inflamed with lust for one another” as anything other than homosexuality.
If you’re going to just throw out the whole Bible, call yourself an atheist, and jettison the notion of sin entirely, I can respect that to a certain degree. But this revisionist nonsense is beyond hypocritical.
posted January 5, 2009 at 2:20 pm
“not being able to choose for themselves whom they marry”
If society as a whole is so despicable and you hate it, why insist on participating in one of it’s institutions? Why not just go get a lawyer and sign a binding contract with your partner that has all the same protections as marriage?
I’ll tell you why, because you want to throw a cloak of legitimacy over your sinful activities and force everybody else to agree with you. It’s attention grabbing, pure and simple.
posted January 5, 2009 at 2:26 pm
“Why not just go get a lawyer and sign a binding contract with your partner that has all the same protections as marriage?”
Because you can’t just sign a binding legal contract with your partner that has all the same protections of marriage.
posted January 5, 2009 at 3:19 pm
I find it sad that both sides are grouping people together based on the views of the radical. Many GBLT people appreciate the people of faith that don’t let their faith interfere with others legal rights – we do. We thank you for your understanding and recognition that GBLT folks are people too. However, there are extremists on either side of the issue – and unfortunately, that’s who gets the news because violence and drama sell the papers, and that gives a distorted view of both sides – the GBLT community as a whole is hurting from this blow to their civil rights, however most of the protests have been very peaceful – and many of them do not endorse these bigoted attacks on persons of faith and places of worship.
Just my two cents.
posted January 5, 2009 at 3:38 pm
you don’t get to play the martyr card when you provoke someone into attacking you
But this particular parish isn’t provocative, that’s the point. Parishioners can be sad about such bad treatment without feigning martyrdom.
“perverted fundamentalist translations of the 20th century”
Yeah, I liked that one too, oh, you have no idea how much I liked it. Sweet.
posted January 5, 2009 at 4:26 pm
“If society as a whole is so despicable and you hate it” Not something I said, ZZ. Do you have to make stuff up in order to make yourself look clever?
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:09 pm
It is ironic how christians say that they have the right to disagree with gay people, but they don’t find anything wrong on imposing their views on others who don’t agree with them.
So, they are telling gays, your relationship is sinful and I don’t agree with you, yet you need to live under our rules. How democratic!
It is ok for the pope to say that homosexuality is destructing human kind and it needs to be protected, as we protect the rain forest from man’s destruction. If you ask me, that language spits hatre. I wish the pope would come out with the same harsh language for those priests sexually abusing children.
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Homosexuality is a sexual perversion. It’s debauchery is considered no less that bestiality in God’s Word.
Next Please!
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:18 pm
I wish the pope would come out with the same harsh language for those priests sexually abusing children.
Just how carefully are you listening for it, then?
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Yeah the same is adultery!
Next please
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:21 pm
All I heard is hush hush money to pay to the victims.
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Pick and choose whatever sins are good for my own convenience. That should be slogan for christianity.
Pope needs to come out of the closet.
posted January 5, 2009 at 5:38 pm
if it was a “gay”, it wasn’t a san francisco “gay” since they know that MHR is as gay as catholic churchs get…
i am not asking for the church to change at all, just the state. that is what you religious people just can’t understand. i want the right to get married at city hall, not in your church.
posted January 5, 2009 at 6:16 pm
I didn’t read any reason that would connect this vandalism to the gay marraige issue. With the info that I have, this sound like an assumption supported by homophobic paranoia. Is it possible that someone, like a angry teenager or even an organization that is known to use the swastica as a symbol did this?
Why don’t we hear about vandalism against supporters of gay marriage? Would it be right to demonize the whole conservative Christian community in Los Angeles becasue someone slashed a large No on Prop 8 banner that was in front of an Espicopal church in downtown LA. It makes about as much sense as demonizing all gays because a few have acted out against property.
posted January 5, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Why would an LGBT person paint a swastika on anything…and in an LGBT neighborhood, no less? I’m with Panthera on this one. I call foul.
ZZ: “Oh, great, here comes the ‘my special translation is the right one’ argument. Might as well be a Jehovah’s Witness.”
At least the Jehovah’s Witnesses have their freedom of religion protected by the Constitution. LGBT Christians…not so much.
posted January 5, 2009 at 7:59 pm
“Maybe it really doesn’t matter to gays that gays attend this church, they belong to a ‘bigoted’ organization that has to be punished for their views.”
Because clearly no over-zealous gay person ever does something without first consulting the entire LGBT community (assuming it was even a gay person who did this). I mean, you don’t seem to consider this possibility, so you must know this for a fact. You wouldn’t jump to conclusions, would you?
posted January 6, 2009 at 12:58 am
respect? how about respecting the poor folks whose lives where sent into a tailspin over prop 8. how sad that religious folks would attack gay people.
who cares about this- its a building! no one was harmed.
a few coats of paint and it will be fine.
posted January 6, 2009 at 4:00 am
Why a swastika? Well, how about this: Pope Benedict (the former Cardinal Ratzinger named in the graffiti) was a member of Hitler Youth and served in the Nazi Army. Hmmm…could that be the connection?
Without excusing spray-paint vandalism (hey, my building a half-mile away has been tagged several times, too, grr) I find it difficult to understand why the police are targeting this as a hate crime, when it’s clearly a political statement against the political actions of two particular men. Is it because it involved a church, a church whose anointed leader (whose authority is accepted by all parishoners, including the gay ones) has called GLBT people “intrinsically disordered,” gravely sinful, as big a threat as global warming, and an “obstacle on the road to peace?” Of course, that’s not hate speech, is it, since it was said IN a church and not written ON one.
Still, since Benedict has just opposed a UN measure supporting worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality (which can get you executed in a number of lovely countries), it’s hard to for me to get too upset over a political message spray-painted on one of his churches. Sorry.
posted January 6, 2009 at 12:54 pm
>>>You’d think that gays would know which people are for them and won’t target their supporters:
And you have REAL SOLID evidence that this was done by gays??? Jesus whisper in your ear or something like that?
posted January 8, 2009 at 2:12 am
Not surprised; unfortunately I have seen ALOT of hatred in the gay community and I have now changed my view towards the hole “injustice” cry; I don’t think Jesus Christ would be pleased that people are using him in churches to promote a lifestyle that is not biblical. If a person chooses to disobey the law of the land, they get punished by the law, they don’t cry “injustice” because they weren’t able to practice their lawbreaking habit, but the glbt found a way to do it and has fooled alot of folks in the process, but Jesus did warn folks to be aware of deceivers, one of whom i believe to be the glbt. I don’t believe in discrimination or hate towards ANYONE, we are all sinners and struggling to be better everyday, however, there is a big difference between people who love God and strive to be more like HIM and those who wish to change the way HE is to suit their own selfish desires. You will know them by their fruit! Love/hate .. good/evil
posted January 8, 2009 at 8:00 am
“If a person chooses to disobey the law of the land, they get punished by the law, they don’t cry “injustice” because they weren’t able to practice their lawbreaking habit, but the glbt found a way to do it and has fooled alot of folks in the process, but Jesus did warn folks to be aware of deceivers, one of whom i believe to be the glbt.”
Well, if you feel that strongly about it, there are places in the world where homosexuality (and probably the other stuff too) is illegal and can get you prison time. In fact, last I checked 7 countries allow the DEATH penalty for it. So feel free to move to a country where “justice” is served.
posted January 29, 2009 at 6:19 am
Very Sad from many angles.