Gibbs mocks the WH lapdogs' coverage of the "beer summit"

I have to agree with Karen the Luciferian on this one. Sometimes stereotypes are apt even though they are stereotypes. The self-identified Reformed Christians, Eugene for instance, do get pretty venomous in their comments here, not just for the rest of the world but also for others of their "faith."

Karen:

Yes, I know what you think of Jesus, but he is my "go to guy" so I choose to quote him. And, as you noted, we all have the right to say what we wish.

Bottom line is this. Adopting the rhetorical tactics of those whom you condemn is simply to continue the same objectionable process. As each side insults the other, they simply become more certain of their own rightness...and the result is a compounded self-righteousness.

I think Michele has said a number of indefensible things (that whole inane "Obama is a perv" thing is a prime example) and she has generally refused to recant, which is a prideful response that actually undermines her credibility.

But one of the practicies to which I have objected most streunously has been her rather glib stereotyping of people with whom she disagrees as "lefties." (She has her own little amen corner in Guy Arthur Thomas who actually seems to think he is being witty using goofball terms like "libtards" amd sprinkling his posts with HAHAHA which he seems utterly unaware makes him look doofy.)

If I find stereotypes pointless and generally unhelpful with one group, I don't see them as helpful or constructive when coming from others.