The woman's daughter had a disagreement with another girl, so the woman posts a sexually suggestive ad to Craigslist with the girl's telephone number. And what's worst she's a social worker. She's had to have dealt with abused children while working for the state. How could she have set this girl up for abuse?
According to prosecutors, Margery Tannenbaum posted the ad to get revenge after an argument between her daughter and the girl, who attend the same school in Hauppauge, New York.And what does this tell her daughter about handling conflicts? That you enact revenge?[...]
According to Suffolk County authorities, the mother of the girl intercepted calls before her daughter answered. She said she received 22 calls in one day, in all around 40 calls from various men who saw the ad, including some seeking an escort service. After Craigslist was issued a subpoena, authorities said they were able to track the account to Tannenbaum.
(via)

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Put her away and strip her of her social worker license. There is a related post at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?p=2054
not only should her license be revoked permanently, but some jail time should be in order, like any other pimp
Wow! It doesn't matter if Ms.Tannenbaum has ever had any problems or been in trouble. Obviously her "problems" have never been seen until now. It takes a sick person to do something like this to a 9 year old girl. It doesn't matter whether her child and this 9 year argued or not. Tannenbaum should loose her Social Service Worker License and then whatever the Judge deems fit for additional punishment. Social Workers are to protect children! It is a part of life that children argue and sometimes have disagreements. Tannenbaum taught her child nothing in the handling of a disagreement.
this woman also subscribed to 8 magazines in the girls name and sent a book and a dvd in her name to her house.
this woman is vile. and she is a christian. she needs to be locked up for a very long time. if she isn't mentally ill she then she is evil.
jenny, i have read comments very much like yours on other websites also not relating to the story at hand. you are trying to bash gays by implication of pedophilia.
should we just take a walk down memory lane of all the hetrosexual republican preachers and elected officials that went after both the boys and the girls?
i don't think you want to go there.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.