Uh Oh! It looks like Tim LaHaye is at it again. He's co-authoring a series of books which are kind of a prequel to his Left Behind series:
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich., Nov. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Zondervan, a world leader in Christian communications, has signed an agreement with attorney Craig Parshall and Tim LaHaye, creator and co-author of the world renowned Left Behind series. Three years after the success of the Left Behind final installment, LaHaye returns to publish Edge of Apocalypse, an apocalyptic epic infused with political intrigue ripped from today's headlines, the first book in a new series called The End.Just what we need a series of novels that popularize the blending of biblical prophecy (or at least LaHaye's version of it) and politics. Like we haven't had enough of that already."I'm thrilled to partner with Zondervan to produce a series hopefully even more innovative than Left Behind," said LaHaye. "While my past works have piqued interest in biblical prophecy on a global level, The End series includes many prophecies that were not covered in Left Behind."
Edge of Apocalypse jumpstarts the series as military-hero-turned-inventor Joshua Jordan attempts to save Manhattan from two nuclear missiles. Using his Return to Sender military defense system, Jordan finds himself facing an unbearable ransom to the nation he loves. As tensions escalate and global alliances topple, only Jordan and a secret group known only as The Patriots can save the United States from terrorists abroad and traitors within.
Set in the very near future, The End series chronicles the earth shattering events which eventually lead up to the Rapture and the beginning of the prophesied Last Days of mankind.
Unfortunately, the distinction between what the Bible says in context and how LaHaye interprets it will be lost on his readers. How many of them read his books and just took his interpretation at face value? How many actually open up their Bible and study for themselves the context of the prophecies? How many have actually made it through the book of Revelation and looked into other interpretations? Very doubtful that it was a majority.
I know at least one reader who blurred the distinction between the Bible and LaHaye. He asked me if I had read the series and I told him I had but found them so preposterous I laughed my way through each of the novels. He was shocked, "Michele, how can you laugh at God's word?" It was my turn to be shocked, "Those books are not God's word, they're an interpretation." Of course, he had to agree with me on that. I always wondered how many people believed what LaHaye wrote will actually take place. Given the popularity of dispensationalism, probably quite a few.
BTW, LaHaye's new co-author has written many books (some with his wife, Janet Parshall -- the talk show host). It looks like he writes mostly legal thrillers
.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Whether intentionally or not, LaHaye is influencing, shaping, even redirecting classic dispensational theology through his fiction.
Which classic dispensational theology? Ah.
LaHaye's contribution to the "tradition" is setting down a firm scenario because the innumerable alternatives undermine the entire eschatological system in the minds of many. As it should.
"Those books are not God's word, they're an interpretation." Of course, he had to agree with me on that.
I'm surprised so much was conceded. Perspicuity of Scripture and all.
The whole system hangs on Amos 3:7, you know that: Surely the Lord GOD does nothing unless He reveals His secret counsel to His servants the prophets. (NASB. cf. Gen. 6:13, 18:17; Jer. 23:22; Dan. 9:22; John 15:15).
To admit ignorance of the intricate details of the end-times is to show oneself faithless ( ἄπιστος) ... to God and Scripture.
The problem with making the characters of a religiously themed novel obvious caracitures of living people is that those who read it can be influenced to believe that someone like Barack Obama is not merely a political opponent whose philosophy is different and misguided into a personification of evil itself. The author changes the average reader's understanding of Barack Obama from merely a president who is taking a country in a direction you do not approve of into a demonic force that must be destroyed not only political, but bodily, as well.
"To admit ignorance of the intricate details of the end-times is to show oneself faithless ( ἄπιστος) ... to God and Scripture."
Are you saying that is your perspective or that is the dispensational perspective? Or are they one and the same?
The problem with making the characters of a religiously themed novel obvious caracitures of living people
I would hope that the book would contain an old-fashioned disclaimer that runs along the lines of "any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental" and MEAN IT.
Tom, I offer a specific example in the same vein as michele's above ("how can you laugh at God's word?"), of a general tendency: that in our own unique ways, we determine who's in and who's out.
Myself, I'm faithless according to a great many systems.
Peace.
Obviously I respond to comments made over one day ago, so I hope somebody reads my words. The Dispensational / Pre-mil interpretation is only one interpretation of the end times. What is sure is that God's saints will suffer oppression from God's enemies, and we should look at such trials as opportunities to shine with God's Holy Spirit. Someone should write a book about Christian doctors not being allowed to train or be hired in hospitals because the Christians will not perform abortions, and all the social upheaval such conflicts of conscience will bring. Unless God sends His Spirit, Europe and all the "developed" nations may become like the Roman empire before Constantine, and all this before the return of Christ!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.