Do You Believe in Miracles?
10 Exercises to Stay Spiritually Fit
20 Scriptures That Bring Hope to Any Situation
5 Ways to Revive Your Dream!
7 Ways to Plant Seeds of Greatness in Your Life
20 Powerful Declarations to Fight Discouragement
5 Ways to Stay Healthy This Summer
5 Tips for Better Sleep
7 Top Health Issues Facing Today’s Women
Celebrities Who Won't Back Down
A Conversation with Minnesota Wild Center Matt Cullen
Yes, Gratitude Works!
10 Ways to To Handle Life Changes With Courage
The Fruits of Desire
Nurturing a Healthy Marriage
10 Ways to Get Over a Hurtful Past
Ten Things Every Dad Should Tell His Son
Brody File
CAPITAL J
Christianity Today Politics Blog
CNN Belief Blog
Daniel Schultz
David Gibson
dotCommonweal
Faith and Reason
James Besser’s Political Insider
In All Things
NCR Today
Religious Connections
RD Blog: The Devil’s Advocate
Episcopal Café: The Lead
Talk to Action
Under God
Whispers in the Loggia
“Religion freedom rolled back by SCOTUS” proclaims yesterday’s post
by Rod Dreher on the Supreme Court’s decision
in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. Taking off from a post
by Wendy Kaminer over at the Atlantic, Dreher claims the court
“believes that it’s licit to protect other groups, while singling
traditional Christians out for special discrimination.”
That’s nonsense. What the court has done is decide that the Hastings Law
School’s “all comers” rule for providing support to student groups
applies to the “traditional Christians” who run the Christian Legal
Society. But what Dreher really needs to recognize is that the decision
has nothing whatsoever to do with religious freedom–because two decades
ago the court seriously truncated the ability of religious individuals
and groups to make Free Exercise claims.
I won’t repeat myself explaining this, except to say that the irony here is that it was
Justice Scalia and his conservative allies (plus John Paul Stevens) who
put in place the current standard that such claims cannot prevail
against “neutral laws of general applicability.” As the majority in Christian
Legal Society makes clear, an “all comers” policy is neutral and
generally applicable. Dreher’s beef should be with Scalia & Co., who
denied traditional Christians and everybody else the ability to make
special claims on behalf of their religious views, in line with the way
the First Amendment singles out Free Exercise for special protection.
posted July 8, 2010 at 5:35 pm
What’s really afoot here is that Christians have enjoyed centuries of unquestioned deference in all aspects of public life. Now that society and courts are treating them as “merely” equal citizens, they’re crying persecution.
posted July 13, 2010 at 11:51 am
Mr. Dreher, like yourself, ignores the issue of taxpayer money going to fund discriminatory groups like this so-called “Christian” “Legal” club.
If they take public moneys, they obey public rules. Take away public moneys and they’re free to discriminate all they want.
Why do conservatives miss (ignore) the actual meat of the issue so much?